This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Splitting hairs: Research team applies science of biomechanics to understand our bad hair days

Splitting hairs – Trinity team applies science of biomechanics to understand our bad hair days
An electron microscope image of a hair, split along its length. Credit: Prof. David Taylor, Trinity College Dublin

Academics are often accused of "splitting hairs," but a team at Trinity College Dublin has now devised a machine to do just that. We all have a bad hair day from time to time, and split ends are a common problem. However, the science behind this kind of hair damage is poorly understood, which is why the Trinity team, led by Professor David Taylor, is investigating this knotty problem.

Prof. Taylor's research in the Trinity Centre for Biomedical Engineering covers all kinds of natural materials, from human bone to seashells but he had never worked on hair. So, when cosmetics company L'Oreal approached him, he was happy to accept the challenge.

Working with colleagues, he developed the "Moving Loop Fatigue machine," which has been expertly designed to recreate what happens when tangled hair is combed out. The results have just been published in the journal Interface Focus.

Two types of hair were tested: some from a person who suffered from split ends and some from a person who didn't. Using the machine, the team was able to generate splits in both types of hair, but the splitting-prone hair split more quickly and generated splits that were much longer. Additionally, when bleached, the hair from the person who didn't suffer with split ends started to split similarly to the splitting-prone sample.

Isobel Duffy, one of the researchers on the team, added, "We were amazed at how well the machine worked—often, a single strand of hair split into two along its whole length, in the same way that hair does when some people dry and comb it before starting their days. Now that we can create splits in a reproducible way, we can go on to study why some people's hair splits and some don't, and better investigate the effects that some cosmetic treatments have on hair quality."

Prof. David Taylor said, "This work constitutes a first step in developing a scientific approach to better understanding the biomechanics of hair splitting. It paves the way for future studies, including a more comprehensive experimental program involving a larger number of donors with different hair types—including —and more that could incorporate the effects of humidity, temperature and different treatments.

"Hair is a complex material and it is surprising how little we know about it. In time our work may change that, with implications for the cosmetics industry and the millions of people across the globe that want to take first-rate care of their hair."

Another team member, Robert Teeling, added, "When I started as an Engineering student in Trinity I didn't think I would spend my Masters' year testing hair. But it turned out to be a great project: I designed and built a new type of machine from scratch and made a real contribution to science. I learnt that hair is a material like any other: it can break through mechanical forces, in this case when you comb or brush it, and it's sensitive to how you treat it."

More information: David Taylor et al, The biomechanics of splitting hairs, Interface Focus (2024). DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2023.0063

Citation: Splitting hairs: Research team applies science of biomechanics to understand our bad hair days (2024, June 10) retrieved 19 June 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2024-06-hairs-team-science-biomechanics-bad.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Expert advice for women with thinning hair

66 shares

Feedback to editors