This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

trusted source

proofread

Spider's distribution differs by urban habitat

Spider's distribution differs by urban habitat
Study System—Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (a). The web consists of a retreat where the spider waits for prey to land, fall, or walk on the web sheet (b). Credit: Urban Ecosystems (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s11252-023-01379-z

The concept of urbanization rests on the population distribution of human beings, more than 50% of whom now live near large, often densely packed groups of other people. But the consequences of that urbanization—shifts in vegetation, localized fluctuations in temperature and wind, light and sound—can alter the distribution of other animals, too.

Given their limited lifespans, and other arthropods must adapt more quickly than most, making them a valuable proxy for the ecological effects of urbanization. While hard data is hard to come by, arachnologists suspect that the global population of spiders—which eat up to 800 million metric tons of pests in a year—is now falling. Whether urbanization is contributing, and to what extent, remains a subject of some debate.

In search of factors that might sway the distribution and abundance of city-dwelling spiders, Nebraska's Brandi Pessman and her colleagues turned to the wide-ranging species Agelenopsis pennsylvanica. The team sought out A. pennsylvanica in two areas of Lincoln: Nebraska U's City Campus, considered an urban center, and Wilderness Park, an urban forest.

As expected, the team found that those habitats differed in ways potentially relevant to the spiders. City Campus featured more artificial light, traffic and engineered surfaces—the latter contributing to higher temperatures—whereas Wilderness Park included more tree cover and plant diversity.

A sampling expedition identified 131 funnel webs constructed by A. pennsylvanica, 64 of which brought forth spiders when the team stimulated the webs with a toothpick affixed to an electric toothbrush. City Campus boasted substantially more of those webs, and more spiders, than did Wilderness Park. Less distance separated the webs of the urban center than in the urban forest. And webs built on campus generally resided closer to the ground.

These findings, now published in Urban Ecosystems, suggest that differences between the could be motivating the chosen by A. pennsylvanica, whose may help it adapt to human-disturbed areas that are less hospitable to pickier predators.

Yet the team also found that, even within City Campus, A. pennsylvanica webs were fewer and farther apart in spaces adjacent to roads or highways. The vibrations that propagate when rubber meets road might be to blame: Like many , A. pennsylvanica relies on vibratory signals both to hunt and woo mates.

Pessman is already conducting follow-up research on A. pennsylvanica in rural versus , hoping to determine whether environmental vibrations in the latter can limit the 's ability to detect prey. She's also looking into whether the spider could be using webs to dampen disruptive frequencies.

More information: Brandi J. Pessman et al, Urbanization affects web abundance and aggregation of a funnel-weaving spider, Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (Agelenidae), Urban Ecosystems (2023). DOI: 10.1007/s11252-023-01379-z

Citation: Spider's distribution differs by urban habitat (2023, December 7) retrieved 27 February 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-12-spider-differs-urban-habitat.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Brown widow spider study shows how invasive species prosper in favorable habitats

1 shares

Feedback to editors