This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:



How good is the data for tracking countries' agricultural greenhouse gas emissions?

How good is the data for tracking countries' agricultural greenhouse gas emissions?
Landscape in Yangambi, DRC. Credit: Axel Fassio/CIFOR-ICRAF

Limited accuracy and transparency of national greenhouse gas emission inventories are curbing climate action, especially in the agriculture and land use sector.

Inconsistent and inadequate reporting by low-and- (LMICs), uncertainties in reported data, and a lack of robust activity data and locally specific emission factors have been found to curb effective policy action. GHG inventories are the foundation for accounting and tracking progress toward mitigation goals and must have access to reliable, legible, and consistent data to make informed decisions.

A review of UNFCCC country-reported agricultural greenhouse gas (GHG) data and three independent global databases provides an in-depth analysis and of reporting issues that affect national GHG inventories. Inventories were characterized by quality and consistency aiming to enable better use of data and tracking progress toward climate change mitigation goals.

Results show a gap in LMIC reporting in the UNFCCC data, highlighting a need for more uniform reporting methodologies, especially to manage and climate change adaptation and mitigation. Policy and decision-makers should therefore use independent, non-UNFCCC emissions databases to triangulate UNFCCC data for emissions-related decisions.

Lead author Kyle Dittmer explained that "other analyses show a general lack of quality in UNFCCC reporting. UNFCCC-reported data should be the most official, but it's often the most incomplete and is sometimes illegible. We identified specific areas to improve consistency." Some examples of what affected the quality of countries' reports included mistakes and a lack of reporting numbers, inconsistent global warming potentials, and legibility.

The authors give recommendations for how inventories can be enhanced to drive progress toward goals instead of limiting action. Dittmer also said that "developed nations must intensify their technical and to LMICs to create and maintain institutional capacity, tools, and training for preparing accurate and transparent national GHG inventories."

Developed nations cannot continue to fall short of their climate-finance pledges. Ambitious financial and technical support for LMICs is needed to fulfill the commitment wealthy nations made to the Paris Agreement so that decision-makers can accurately track progress, set mitigation priorities, and manage emissions.

The research is published in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.

More information: Kyle Dittmer et al, How good is the data for tracking countries' agricultural greenhouse gas emissions? Making use of multiple national greenhouse gas inventories, Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems (2023). DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2023.1156822

Provided by The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture

Citation: How good is the data for tracking countries' agricultural greenhouse gas emissions? (2023, May 19) retrieved 23 September 2023 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Satellites improve national reporting of greenhouse gases


Feedback to editors