This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

proofread

Being a social broker at work leads to burnout and abuse, research finds

coworkers
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Employees who act as brokers (i.e., they sustain communications between coworkers who do not communicate directly) are more likely to burn out and become abusive towards their co-workers, according to new research from ESMT Berlin.

This research, led by Eric Quintane, associate professor of organizational behavior at ESMT Berlin, examines the psychological costs of having to sustain communications with who do not communicate directly with each other. They could be coworkers who are in different units, regions, or , which makes it hard for them to communicate. They could also be coworkers who have different expertise or focus or are in conflict with each other, and they require someone else as an intermediary to coordinate their activities.

Although there are significant benefits to being a broker, such as increased performance, creativity, or faster promotions, brokers who keep intermediating third parties increase their risk of and abuse.

The research project spans three studies using different methodologies, measurements, and cultural contexts. In the first study, the researchers studied employees' email exchange records as well as burnout and abusive behavior data for over 1,500 employees of a large South American university over a five-month period.

Study 2 used an online longitudinal survey with employees based in the US, while Study 3 used an that assigned employees randomly to sustain communications with disconnected coworkers. All three studies point in the same direction: When employees communicate with coworkers who cannot or do not want to communicate directly, they experience increased burnout, which then leads to a higher chance of engaging in abusive behavior.

"Though the benefits of brokering relationships can be consequential, it's a high-risk, high-reward activity," says Prof. Quintane. "The increased chances of burnout are detrimental for the broker or the organization, with the likelihood of that needing to take time off after a period of high-stress levels. These high-stress levels are likely to cause brokers to take this out on their co-workers, becoming abusive in their role—this is harmful for the wider organization, especially because brokers typically play an important coordination role between groups or departments."

One way to buffer brokers from burnout, Prof. Quintane suggests, is by providing them with opportunities to periodically disengage from their role so that they can replenish their psychological resources. Organizations should encourage to take a break after engaging in brokering and encourage brokers to utilize resources that help them deal with the stress involved in brokering.

The research is forthcoming in Organization Science.

More information: The Strain of Spanning Structural Holes: How Brokering Leads to Burnout and Abusive Behavior: www.dropbox.com/s/jk75bt3fpk8k … /Manuscript.pdf?dl=0

Journal information: Organization Science

Provided by European School of Management and Technology

Citation: Being a social broker at work leads to burnout and abuse, research finds (2023, February 7) retrieved 16 April 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2023-02-social-broker-burnout-abuse.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Employees with a history of burnout have lowest chances of selection for promotion

2 shares

Feedback to editors