This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies. Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:


peer-reviewed publication

trusted source


Antarctic icebergs still exist today where 1700-era sailors spotted and tracked them

Antarctic icebergs still exist today where 1700-era sailors spotted and tracked them
Comparison of the datasets: BYU/NIC in red, AWI in orange, Halley, Bouvet and Riou observations in black and Cook's cruise tracks and data points in blue. His first traverse of the Weddell Sea is a solid line; his second is dotted. For Cook, open circles mean no icebergs; small closed circles, one to three icebergs; larger closed circles, many icebergs. The circled point on 8 January 1773 marks where Cook collected fresh water from an iceberg and of Hodges's watercolor. Also marked are Cook's three crossings of the Antarctic circle, his farthest south and the sea-ice and iceberg tongue in the Weddell Sea. The dashed lines between 45°S and 60°S show the boundaries of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC). The dotted circle is the Antarctic Circle. The latitude–longitude box (62°S–68°S, 3°W–12°E) in the Weddell Sea shows the location of the Maud Rise Polynya. Credit: Journal of Glaciology (2022). DOI: 10.1017/jog.2022.111

A new study comparing observations of large Antarctic icebergs from the 1700s with modern satellite datasets shows the massive icebergs are found in the same areas where they were pinpointed three centuries ago. The study shows that despite their rudimentary tools, the old explorers truly knew their craft, and it confirms that the icebergs have behaved consistently for more than 300 years.

Using primarily the journal records of Captain James Cook's 1772–1775 Antarctic circumnavigation on the HMS Resolution (where he noted the positions of hundreds of icebergs), a trio of researchers from Brigham Young University, NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the University of Washington's School of Oceanography made comparisons with the two largest modern datasets available today: the BYU/National Ice Center and Alfred Wegener Institute datasets.

They found that Cook's description of the plume east of Antarctica's Amery Ice Shelf, along with iceberg distributions in the Weddell, Ross and Amundsen Seas, agree with modern data. They also found additional iceberg tracking by Edmond Halley in 1700, Lozier Bouvet in 1739 and Edward Riou in 1789 are consistent with modern observations.

"Where they saw icebergs, we see icebergs now; where they didn't seem them, we don't see them," said study coauthor David G. Long, BYU professor of electrical and computer engineering. "The old data from these explorers may not been very good, but it's all that we've got from that time—and it's good enough."

Cook's observations make up 95% of the used for comparison in the study. His crew used the Larcum Kendall K1 watch in combination with a sextant to track longitude on their journey. The K1 watch carried a heavy price tag (£450—the ship Cook sailed for the trip, the HMS Resolution, cost £1,800) so Cook took great care of the device, requiring the commander, first lieutenant and astronomer all present when it was used.

Lead study author Seelye Martin extracted Cook's iceberg observations from a line-by-line search of Cook's journal-turned-book about his journey: "A Voyage Towards the South Pole, and Round the World." It turns out that when possible, Cook recorded his position alongside his iceberg observations, which he referred to as "ice islands," "ice isles," and "hills of ice."

"Cook kept pretty good records, but they're not perfect," Long said. "They're basically journal entries. He took some days off. Sometimes he would just say 'saw a lot of ice in the ocean.' Wish it was a little better, but on the other hand it was pretty unique."

Fortunately, Cook's onboard astronomer, William Wales, also recorded iceberg observations, which helped fill in a few gaps in Cook's records.

After creating a spreadsheet of Cook's data (along with data from Halley, Bouvet and Riou), Martin, Long and coauthor Michael Schodlok plotted the voyagers' trips and observations on a map of Antarctica that includes the modern iceberg data. BYU's part of the dataset uses low-resolution satellite scatterometer radars to track icebergs while the National Ice Center data consists of iceberg positions derived from visible, infrared and radar satellite observations. The Alfred Wegener Institute uses satellite transponders to track icebergs from the Weddell Sea.

The diagram provides a visual confirmation of how consistent the early explorers observations are with modern iceberg observations.

Long said since the databases they use track rather large icebergs which are not as sensitive to climate change. Because of that, the study doesn't necessarily make a connection to global warming issues, but the result of no significant iceberg change from 1700 to 2000s is fascinating to consider.

"It's the first comparison that I'm aware of, of a satellite iceberg database with pre-modern era data," Long said. "I have always been proud that my database goes back multiple decades, but here we're going back multiple centuries…

"I guess it's a good reminder to keep a journal; you never know how it will be used in the future," he said.

The research appears in the Journal of Glaciology.

More information: Seelye Martin et al, Comparison of Antarctic iceberg observations by Cook in 1772–75, Halley in 1700, Bouvet in 1739 and Riou in 1789 with modern data, Journal of Glaciology (2022). DOI: 10.1017/jog.2022.111

Journal information: Journal of Glaciology

Citation: Antarctic icebergs still exist today where 1700-era sailors spotted and tracked them (2023, January 11) retrieved 12 April 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Image: Meet the world's largest iceberg


Feedback to editors