Research makes physics of glass formation clearer

Research makes physics of glass formation clearer
Tg and Tx in Mg–Cu–Y. a, c Composition maps determined through FIM: Values vary smoothly and correlate with the pure element melting temperatures. b, d Validation by comparison with literature values Tg,Lit and Tx,Lit: Our FIM values correlate strongly with DSC-based literature values, confirming that FIM yields qualitatively and quantitatively reliable data. Tx values are systematically lower by ~10 °C, indicating a reduced crystallization resistance in the film. Note: In Figs. 3 and 4, black stars represent bulk-glass forming compositions. Triangle markers (near middle star) represent curves in Fig. 2.c.4. Sets of available composition map points can differ. For example, some points available at high Y concentrations in (a) are not available in (c). Here, the expanding films burst before reaching Tx. Credit: Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31314-3

The fragility of liquid—that is, how the fluidity of a liquid changes with temperature—has long been believed to be a key factor in understanding liquids and also how they form into glasses. However, a reliable way to measure fragility in liquids has been elusive. Now, a team of researchers have developed a better way to determine this critical property.

The results are published in Nature Communications.

In the lab of Jan Schroers, professor of mechanical engineering & , the researchers developed a method they call the film inflation method (FIM) that measures the fragility of a wide range of metallic glass-forming liquids. By doing so, not only did the researchers get a clearer sense of the liquids' properties, but it also contradicted a long-held assumption in the field that a low fragility is better for the formation of metallic glasses, a material that's stronger than even the best metals, but with the pliability of plastic. These materials owe their properties to their unique atomic structures: when metallic glasses cool from a liquid to a solid, their settle into a random arrangement and do not crystallize the way traditional metals do.

Schroers said the method is a "big step toward" figuring out the tricky physics of metallic glass. The part of the formation process is especially confounding.

"The is the most difficult state for us to understand, to measure," he said. "Essentially everything is known about solids, how the atoms arrange, and we can calculate it all on a computer—you almost don't need to do experiments anymore. Gas is also very easy, because the atoms are so far apart from each other, they don't really interact. Liquid, as a state, we almost know nothing about it."

That could change with the new method, which Schroers developed with Sebastian Kube, a former Ph.D. student in his lab and lead author of the study.

"This allows us to extend theories on formation, which is one of the biggest mysterious in physics," he said.

More information: Sebastian A. Kube et al, Compositional dependence of the fragility in metallic glass forming liquids, Nature Communications (2022). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31314-3

Journal information: Nature Communications

Provided by Yale University

Citation: Research makes physics of glass formation clearer (2022, August 25) retrieved 6 May 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2022-08-physics-glass-formation-clearer.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

Quicker, more precise way to find metallic glasses

125 shares

Feedback to editors