Undercover evolution: Our individuality is encrypted in our DNA, but it is deeper than expected

dna
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Providing a glimpse the hidden workings of evolution, a group of researchers at UC Santa Barbara have discovered that embryos that appear the same can start out with surprisingly different instructions.

"We found that a lot of undercover evolution occurs in ," said Joel Rothman, a professor in the Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, who led the team.

Indeed, although members of the same species are identical across the vast majority of their genomes, including all the genetic instructions used in development, Rothman and his colleagues found that key parts of the assembly instructions used when embryos first start developing can differ dramatically between individuals of the same species.

This finding may shed light on two important areas: how can evolve quickly, and why patients can show very different responses to particular drugs.

The scientists' research is published in the journal eLife.

"Many of the distinctive features that make us unique, including our color, height and susceptibility to diseases, are determined by our genomes," Rothman said. "But since everyone looks pretty similar as embryos, the genetic assembly instructions that get us started at conception were thought to be nearly identical between us."

Enter the C. elegans nematode worm, a celebrated laboratory animal model used for decades to investigate how animals develop. Rothman's team, which included researchers at the University of Auckland, targeted the gene switches that turn on the development of the animal's intestine with a tool called RNAi—a technique that shuts down individual gene functions. What they learned was that the widely accepted "standard one-size-fits-all" concept of genetic assembly instructions did not apply.

"This remarkable difference is well-hidden in the genome, but was uncovered when one of the switches was removed," noted Yamila Torres Cleuren, formerly of University of Auckland and now a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Bergen and lead author of the study. "We were startled to find that while some members of the species absolutely require one of the critical switches to start making an intestine, others can almost dispose of it." While some animals generally failed to develop intestines, relatives from the same species made them regardless.

"It's stunning that such an important event at the earliest stages of embryo formation can occur by such different means within one species and yet produce essentially the same outcome," said Rothman. "Prior to these findings, we were unaware that the blueprints for an early embryo change so rapidly within a species."

This discovery would be equivalent to finding that the manufacturing of two iPhones, which look and function identically, started out with different assembly instructions, the researchers said.

While humans are a far cry from C. elegans, once the initial events in embryo development begin, the later that create the endoderm appear to be similar to those likely used in all animals with a digestive tract, including humans.

This result is particularly striking given that the endoderm is both the first layer formed in embryos and was probably the first to evolve over half a billion years ago. "It reveals an extreme version of the first part of the 'hourglass' view of embryo development, in which very similar instructions across widely different animals during the middle stages of development are preceded and followed by very different starting and ending points," Rothman said.

These findings also shine light on why patients can respond so differently to drug therapies. "We found that these animals with relatively subtle genetic differences respond wildly differently to a genetic 'drug' that we used to turn off a gene," Torres Cleuren said.

Thus, just as two people who might look very similar can respond very differently to a drug therapy, so these little worms of the same respond dramatically differently to an administered substance as a result of their subtle but all-important genetic individuality, the researchers said.

The discovery of such hidden genetic mechanisms could help guide how pharmaceuticals are developed in this era of precision medicine, in which drugs are ideally tailored to an individual's genome.

This discovery also underscores the importance of natural variation in allowing evolution to occur. "Genetic variation fuels the machine of evolution," Rothman said. "Without it, life would be stuck in a dead end. There is much more of this variation than we had realized when evolution sculpts the remarkable entities known as ."


Explore further

Symphony of genes

More information: Yamila N Torres Cleuren et al, Extensive intraspecies cryptic variation in an ancient embryonic gene regulatory network, eLife (2019). DOI: 10.7554/eLife.48220
Journal information: eLife

Citation: Undercover evolution: Our individuality is encrypted in our DNA, but it is deeper than expected (2019, September 3) retrieved 18 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-09-undercover-evolution-individuality-encrypted-dna.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
1343 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 03, 2019
Akin to epigenetics ??

Sep 03, 2019
It's in the positioning of DNA chains as they wrap around histones, which is constantly changing, generationally...

Sep 03, 2019
i opinionate, that claims of an "absolutist" genetic code such as pre-programmed personality ignore the life-experience of environment

as well as the unpredictable, randomness of sexual reproduction

Sep 04, 2019
Fascinating, since C. elegans has a controlled cell fate, which most animals have not. These nematodes have the least innate plasticity, yet this shows plasticity is large.

Akin to epigenetics ??


Not really. Sure, epigenetics is under evolutionary control, but it's effects on development would be more like the RNAi regulation of expression. It would add to the variation, but it is one of the previously hidden mechanisms. This study shows there are more of them.

Layers upon layers of evolved mechanisms is found everywhere in animals. Transcription regulation is one major difference between non-body plan animals and those that have one.

This also evolved a larger difference between rodents and primates than the plain genomes indicates, which is part of why mouse/rat experiments say less on humans. Even between sister lineages, chimps have been more populous most of the time and their chromosomes and transcript regulation have seen more evolution than in sloven humans.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more