Researchers develop a gel-like fluid to prevent wildfires

Stanford researchers have developed a gel-like fluid to prevent wildfires
Under the supervision of CalFire, the researchers performed test burns on a grassy roadside area near San Luis Obispo, California, to gauge the effect of a fire-retarding hydrogel. The images above show untreated (left) and treated (right) plots shortly after fire ignition. Credit: Eric Appel

A preventive treatment developed by Stanford researchers could greatly reduce the incidence and severity of wildfires. The approach, outlined Sept. 30 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, involves an environmentally benign gel-like fluid that helps common wildland fire retardants last longer on vegetation.

Applied to ignition-prone areas, these materials retain their ability to prevent fires throughout the peak fire season, even after weathering that would sweep away conventional fire retardants. By stopping fires from starting, such treatments can be more effective and less expensive than current firefighting methods.

"This has the potential to make wildland firefighting much more proactive, rather than reactive," said Eric Appel, the study's senior author and an assistant professor of materials science and engineering. "What we do now is monitor wildfire-prone areas and wait with bated breath for fires to start, then rush to put them out."

A century of fire suppression plus hotter, drier weather has intensified the destructive power of and lengthened the season of threat. While the 2019 season has been relatively calm in the West so far, the past two years have brought four of the 20 largest and eight of the 20 most destructive wildfires in California's history. Across the country, federal firefighting costs in 2018 came to more than $3 billion—the highest total ever.

Long-lasting, environmentally benign

Wildfires are a critical part of some ecosystems, but the vast majority in the U.S. are human-caused. Many of them originate in the same hotspots, such as roadsides, campgrounds and remote electrical lines, time after time. Treating these areas prophylactically could provide a highly targeted approach to wildfire prevention, but, until now, long-lasting and environmentally benign materials have not been available.

Aside from clearing and burning potential fuels, wildfire management generally revolves around fire suppressants and retardants, with many suppressants used as short-term retardants. To fight active fires, crews use suppressants, such as gels that carry water and superabsorbent polymers found in diapers. These gels are frequently used as short-term retardants on buildings in the path of encroaching fires, but they lose effectiveness once the water entrapped in them evaporates—something that often occurs in less than an hour during normal wildland fire conditions.

The most widely deployed commercial wildland fire retardant formulations use ammonium phosphate or its derivatives as the active fire-retarding component. However, these formulations only hold retardants on vegetation for short periods of time, so they can't be used preventively. By contrast, the Stanford-developed technology—a cellulose-based gel-like fluid—stays on target vegetation through wind, rain and other environmental exposure.

"You can put 20,000 gallons of this on an area for prevention, or 1 million gallons of the traditional formulation after a fire starts," said study lead author Anthony Yu, a Ph.D. student in materials science and engineering at Stanford.

Complete fire prevention

The researchers have worked with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CalFire) to test the retardant materials on grass and chamise—two vegetation types where fire frequently starts. They found the treatment provides complete fire protection even after half an inch of rainfall. Under the same conditions, a typical commercial retardant formulation provides little or no fire protection. The researchers are now working with the California Department of Transportation and CalFire to test the material on high-risk roadside areas that are the origin of dozens of wildfires every year.

"We don't have a tool that's comparable to this," said Alan Peters, a CalFire division chief in San Luis Obispo who monitored some of the test burns. "It has the potential to definitely reduce the number of fires."

The Stanford-developed treatment contains only nontoxic starting materials widely used in food, drug, cosmetic and agricultural products. The unique properties of these gel-like retardant fluids allow them to be applied using standard agricultural spraying equipment or from aircraft. While it washes away slowly, providing the ability to protect treated areas against for months, the materials eventually degrade.

"We hope these new materials can open the door to identifying and treating high-risk areas to protect people's lives and livelihoods," said Appel.


Explore further

Most California wildfire is in wildland-urban interface area with less fuel, more people

More information: Anthony C. Yu el al., "Wildfire prevention through prophylactic treatment of high-risk landscapes using viscoelastic retardant fluids," PNAS (2019). www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1907855116
Citation: Researchers develop a gel-like fluid to prevent wildfires (2019, September 30) retrieved 15 October 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-09-gel-like-fluid-wildfires.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
910 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Sep 30, 2019
Please pass on to Australian States immediately.

Sep 30, 2019
I am not sure how practical this is. How can you spray this on the hundreds of thousands of miles of roads in fire prone areas? How can you anticipate where a fire will occur? What are the chances, of the percentage of fires that do start near a road, you will spray the correct spot? Not very high.

Sep 30, 2019
My only concern is unintended consequences; if this works, it will be great, but if it causes problems, it would be good to have tested it and found out on a limited area.

Sep 30, 2019
Really Da Schitebo??
You thunks?

Oct 01, 2019
In the Middle Ages, people knew not to build houses in close proximity to trees. Because trees burn. When did IQ's drop so that dunces not only build in fire-prone areas, after they burn the first time, they rebuild!! Same with spending $350 billion rebuilding New Orleans when they KNOW it'll flood out again.

Oct 01, 2019
Really Da Schitebo??
You thunks?


Antisciencegoony frustratingly battling to think of the right words and uttering out something completely stupid while at the same time trying to understand why he said something so dumb.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more