Predicting earthquake hazards from wastewater injection

Predicting earthquake hazards from wastewater injection
Wells drilled into Oklahoma's Arbuckle formation inject wastewater (1) which then disperses through the rock. As it spreads, the wastewater can trigger earthquakes in fault zones (2), but their size depends on the amount injected and the rock's properties. The new model can predict quake probabilities by the quantity of wastewater injected. Credit: Guang Zhai, Manoochehr Shirzaei/ASU

A byproduct of oil and gas production is a large quantity of toxic wastewater called brine. Well-drillers dispose of brine by injecting it into deep rock formations, where its injection can cause earthquakes. Most quakes are relatively small, but some of them have been large and damaging.

Yet predicting the amount of seismic activity from is difficult because it involves numerous variables. These include the quantity of brine injected, how easily brine can move through the rock, the presence of existing geological faults, and the regional stresses on those faults.

Now a team of Arizona State University-led geoscientists, working under a Department of Energy grant, has developed a method to predict seismic activity from wastewater disposal. The team's study area is in Oklahoma, a state where much fracking activity has been carried out with a lot of wastewater injection, and where there have been several induced earthquakes producing damage.

The team's paper reporting their findings appeared in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on July 29, 2019.

"Overall, hazards increase with background , and that results from changes in the crustal stress," says Guang Zhai, a postdoctoral research scientist in ASU's School of Earth and Space Exploration and a visiting assistant researcher at the University of California, Berkeley. "Our focus has been to model the physics of such changes that result from wastewater injection."

Zhai is lead author for the paper, and the other scientists are Manoochehr Shirzaei, associate professor in the School, plus Michael Manga, of UC Berkeley, and Xiaowei Chen, of the University of Oklahoma.

"Seismic activity soared in one area for several years after wastewater injection was greatly reduced," says Shirzaei. "That told us that existing prediction methods were inadequate."

Predicting earthquake hazards from wastewater injection
The model shows earthquake probability curves for central Oklahoma increasing to 2015 due to brine injection. After injection is reduced and assumed to end in 2017, brine continues to diffuse in the rock, and the curves retreat to background levels. The new model allows operators to compute quake probability for various injection scenarios, maximizing injection while minimizing hazards. Credit: Guang Zhai/ASU

Back to basics

To address the problem, his team went back to basics, looking at how varying amounts of injected brine perturbed the crustal stresses and how these lead to earthquakes on a given fault.

"Fluids such as brine (and natural groundwater) can both be stored and move through rocks that are porous," says Zhai.

The key was building a physics-based model that combined the rock's ability to transport injected brine, and the rock's elastic response to fluid pressure. Explains Shirzaei, "Our model includes the records collected for the past 23 years of brine injected at more than 700 Oklahoma wells into the Arbuckle formation."

He adds that to make the scenario realistic, the model also includes the mechanical properties of the rocks in Oklahoma. The result was that the model successfully predicted changes in the crustal stress that come from brine injection.

For the final step, Shirzaei says, "We used a well-established physical model of how earthquakes begin so we could relate stress perturbations to the number and size of earthquakes."

The team found that the physics-based framework does a good job of reproducing the distribution of actual earthquakes by frequency, magnitude, and time.

"An interesting finding," says Zhai, "was that a tiny change in the rocks' elastic response to changes in fluid pressure can amplify the number of earthquakes by several times. It's a very sensitive factor."

Predicting earthquake hazards from wastewater injection
Oil and gas production requires the disposal of wastewater, which is injected into rock formations far underground through wells such as this. To minimize earthquake hazards from this process, an ASU-led team has created a new model for forecasting induced seismicity from wastewater injection. Credit: KFOR-TV, Oklahoma City

Making production safer

While wastewater injection can cause earthquakes, all major oil and creates a large amount of wastewater that needs to be disposed of, and injection is the method the industry uses.

"So to make this safer in the future," says Shirzaei, "our approach offers a way to forecast injection-caused earthquakes. This provides the industry with a tool for managing the injection of brine after fracking operations."

Knowing the volume of brine to be injected and the location of the disposal well, authorities can estimate the probability that an earthquake of given size will result. Such probabilities can be used for short-term earthquake hazard assessment.

Alternatively, the team says, given the probability that an earthquake of certain size will happen, oil and gas operators can manage the injected volume to keep the probability of large earthquakes below a chosen value.

The end result, says Zhai, "is that this process will allow a safer practice, benefiting both the general public and the energy industry."


Explore further

Oilfield wastewater may trigger earthquakes for 'decades'

More information: DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819225116 Guang Zhai el al., "Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma," PNAS (2019). https://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1819225116
Citation: Predicting earthquake hazards from wastewater injection (2019, July 29) retrieved 23 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-07-earthquake-hazards-wastewater.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
210 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 29, 2019
So the real problem is the lack of legislation on water recycling. Fracking uses a scarce resource - water - and disposes of it irresponsibly. It should be a simple legislative task at state &/or national level to insist that the water be either recycled within the fracking cycle, or purified to an extent that it can be disposed of in creeks and rivers. The same legislation should ban methane flaring. This type of law is in the long term interest of the fracking industry. As necessary redirect government research funds to a Manhattan-style urgent project to make these possible at a reasonable cost to the industry.

Jul 30, 2019
Why should my taxes pay for digging more shit out of the ground that's already causing problems on its own when it's burned? If the oil companies want to dig the shit out of the ground, let them pay. And let the people whose houses and lives are destroyed sue.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more