Study shows how icy outer solar system satellites may have formed

Tokyo Tech-led study shows how icy outer solar system satellites may have formed
The masses of the satellite(s) range from 1/10 to 1/1000 of the corresponding TNOs. For comparison, Earth and Moon are also shown. Credit: NASA/APL/SwRI/ESA/STScI

Using sophisticated computer simulations and observations, a team led by researchers from the Earth-Life Science Institute (ELSI) at Tokyo Institute of Technology has shown how the so-called trans-Neptunian objects (or TNOs) may have formed. TNOs, which include the dwarf planet Pluto, are a group of icy and rocky small bodies—smaller than planets, but larger than comets—that orbit the solar system beyond the planet Neptune. TNOs likely formed at the same time as the solar system, and understanding their origin could provide important clues as to how the entire solar system originated.

Like many solar system bodies, including the Earth, TNOs often have their own satellites, which likely formed early on from collisions among the building blocks of the solar system. Understanding the origin of TNOs along with their satellites may help understand the origin and early evolution of the entire solar system. The properties of TNOs and their satellites—for example, their orbital properties, composition and rotation rates—provide a number of clues for understanding their formation. These properties may reflect their formation and collisional history, which in turn may be related to how the orbits of the giant planets Jupiter, Saturn, Neptune, and Uranus changed over time since the solar system formed.

The New Horizons spacecraft flew by Pluto, the most famous TNO, in 2015. Since then, Pluto and its Charon have attracted a lot of attention from planetary scientists, and many new small satellites around other large TNOs have been found. In fact, all known TNOs larger than 1000 km in diameter are now known to have . Interestingly, the range of estimated mass ratio of these satellites to their host systems ranges from 1/10 to 1/1000, encompassing the moon-to-Earth mass ratio (~1/80). This may be significant because Earth's moon and Charon are both thought to have formed from a giant impactor.

Tokyo Tech-led study shows how icy outer solar system satellites may have formed
Top panels show snapshots for the satellite-forming giant impact with about 1 km/s of the impact velocity and 75 degree of the impact angle. Bottom panel shows the schematic view for the circularization of the satellite's orbit due to tidal interaction after satellite formation. Credit: Arakawa et al. (2019) Nature Astronomy

To study the formation and evolution of TNO satellite systems, the research team performed more than 400 giant impact simulations and tidal evolution calculations. "This is really hard work," says the study's senior author, Professor Hidenori Genda from the Earth-Life Science Institute (ELSI) at Tokyo Institute of Technology. Other Tokyo Tech team members included Sota Arakawa and Ryuki Hyodo.

The Tokyo Tech study found that the size and orbit of the satellite systems of large TNOs are best explained if they formed from impacts of molten progenitors. They also found that TNOs which are big enough can retain internal heat and remain molten for a span of only a few million years; especially if their internal heat source is short-lived radioactive isotopes such as Aluminum-26, which has also been implicated in the internal heating of the parent bodies of meteorites. Since these progenitors would need to have a high short-lived radionuclide content in order to be molten, these results suggest that TNO-satellite systems formed before the outward migration of the outer , including Neptune, or in the first ~ 700 million years of solar system history.

Tokyo Tech-led study shows how icy outer solar system satellites may have formed
The relationship between the initial eccentricity of the formed satellites and the final eccentricity after 4.5-billion-year tidal evolution are shown for three cases. When planetary bodies are rigid for the whole time (right figure) or they behave as a fluid for the first 1000 years (middle figure), most of the eccentricities were not damped, which is not inconsistent with the observation. When they behave as a fluid for the first > 1 million years, the resultant eccentricities are consistent with the observation. Credit: Arakawa et al. (2019) Nature Astronomy

Previous planet formation theories had suggested the growth of TNOs took much longer than the lifetime of short-lived radionuclides, and thus TNOs must not have been molten when they formed. These scientists found, however, that rapid TNO formation is consistent with recent planet formation studies which suggest TNOs formed via accretion of small solids to preexisting bodies. The rapid formation of large TNOs is consistent with recent planet formation studies; however, other analyses suggest comets formed well after most short-lived radionuclides had decayed. Thus the authors note that there is still much work to be done to produce a unified model for the origin of the 's planetary bodies.


Explore further

Mystery orbits in outermost reaches of solar system not caused by 'Planet Nine'

More information: Sota Arakawa et al, Early formation of moons around large trans-Neptunian objects via giant impacts, Nature Astronomy (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41550-019-0797-9
Journal information: Nature Astronomy

Citation: Study shows how icy outer solar system satellites may have formed (2019, June 25) retrieved 18 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-06-icy-outer-solar-satellites.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jun 25, 2019
Your graphic makes it look like Eris is larger, or might be larger, than Pluto.

Pluto is without question the largest KBO/TNO, 19 miles at least more in diameter than Eris. Team New Horizons and NASA data can verify this.

Please stop using outdated graphics.

Jun 25, 2019
"TNOs, which include the dwarf planet Pluto, are a group of icy and rocky small bodies—smaller than planets, but larger than comets—that orbit the solar system beyond the planet Neptune."

The sentence above is problematic, as it essentially lumps all TNOs together and describes them as being "smaller than planets." The article really needs to distinguish between the majority of TNOs, which are smaller than planets, and dwarf planets, which are a subclass of planets, as they are large enough to be rounded by their own gravity.


Jun 27, 2019
The figure text to the last graphic is confusing left with right, and inconsistent with consistent.

The article really needs to distinguish between the majority of TNOs, which are smaller than planets, and dwarf planets, which are a subclass of planets, as they are large enough to be rounded by their own gravity.


I realize that you want to troll science sites to the day you die with the failed attempt to make Pluto (and now Ceres) astronomical planets again. But it is irrelevant for the rest of us since dwarf planets are a subclass of debris objects such as TNOs (Pluto) and asteroids (Ceres).

The astrophysical definition of planets makes any interesting natural solid object a planet, whether a rounded planet, dwarf planet or moon, or irregular debris down to uninteresting sizes for the system you study. Which is why it makes no sense to break the astronomical definition and the astrophysical definition at the same time by your definition (if it had any relevance at all).

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more