Oil industry under pressure to respond to climate change

The oil industry says it is committed to reducing its environmental impact, but critics charge it is moving too slow
The oil industry says it is committed to reducing its environmental impact, but critics charge it is moving too slow

The oil industry, under mounting pressure from environmental activists to react more quickly to counter climate change, has begun to adapt its strategy but is struggling to convince critics it is doing enough.

Last week activists, responding to a call from the Extinction Rebellion group, laid siege to Shell's London headquarters whose windows were smashed.

Several days later hundreds of activists blocked several symbolic sites in France, including the headquarters of oil giant Total.

"They are mastodons whose business model is based on fossil fuels and which don't want to shift one iota because up until now they've made money that way," said Cecile Marchand, who heads up activities of the French branch of the Friends of the Earth network of environmental protection groups.

"The activities of these multinationals are not at all regulated today, and they should be if we are to be serious about the idea of limiting to 1.5 degrees" Celsius, she added, referring to the goal laid out in the 2015 Paris climate deal.

The pressure isn't only coming from .

"Investment funds are now requiring oil and to explain how might affect a company's value," said David Elmes, a professor at Warwick Business School.

"This is driving some companies to be much more transparent about the emissions they cause and their plans to reduce them," he added.

It can be difficult to see a way to meet the Paris climate deal goals through the smog
It can be difficult to see a way to meet the Paris climate deal goals through the smog

Oil to gas

The big actors in the sector—BP, Chevron, ExxonMobil, Saudi Aramco, Shell, Total and others—have banded together in the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative (OGCI), which has a billion-dollar war chest to fund initiatives to reduce climate change emissions.

The companies are trying to limit their , which escape when fossil fuels are taken out of the ground and transported.

Along with agriculture, the remains a key source of methane, which causes more warming than carbon dioxide.

Other energy giants are trying to counterbalance their carbon footprint, like the Italian group ENI, which has promised to plant vast forests.

CEO Claudio Descalzi has said "our objective is to achieve net zero emissions in our upstream business by 2030" via emission reductions and offsets.

The industry has also taken on board a strategic shift towards using more natural gas—which has a lighter carbon footprint than oil—as well as producing electricity via renewables like wind and solar.

Shell recently surprised observers by declaring its ambition to become the world's top electricity producer by 2030.

One of Total's latest facilities, the Kaombo Norte Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel located off the coast of An
One of Total's latest facilities, the Kaombo Norte Floating Production Storage and Offloading vessel located off the coast of Angola

'Evidence' lacking

But some environmental groups point to the fact that energy companies are still pouring most of their investments into pumping out more fossil fuels.

"These companies want to continue exploiting fossil fuels as long as possible," said Marchand. "For them, climate change doesn't matter."

While the spectacular plunge in oil prices in 2014 led to a drastic cut in investment in exploration and development by energy firms, such spending is on the rise again.

Plans by oil and gas majors to spend $4.9 trillion on exploration are incompatible with the goal of the Paris climate deal to limit the rise in global temperature rises, according to an analysis released earlier this week by the pressure group Global Witness.

"The evidence that people are looking for is whether companies are shifting the billions they invest each year away from ," said Elmes at Warwick Business School.

"While some companies are making commitments to do so ... the percentage being invested in non-fossil fuel businesses are still small."

To achieve the Paris targets, oil consumption needs to begin declining dramatically in the next couple of years, according to estimates by the International Energy Agency, which would only be possible by a major shift by the transportation sector towards electric vehicles.


Explore further

$5-tn fuel exploration plans 'incompatible' with climate goals

© 2019 AFP

Citation: Oil industry under pressure to respond to climate change (2019, April 28) retrieved 18 June 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-04-oil-industry-pressure-climate.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
135 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 28, 2019
"To achieve the Paris targets, oil consumption needs to begin declining dramatically in the next couple of years, according to estimates by the International Energy Agency"

If this is true then we are screwed. Trump plus Russia plus China plus India plus the Oil industry are all working against it. (Though surprisingly China are making the right noises as they want to control the future world renewables market.)

Apr 28, 2019
Unfortunately one of the realities here, is that Oil Companies are playing with Trillions of Dollars every year and for them to invest 1 Billion dollars each, (even if each one did) it would be a mere pittance. Also remember the direct & indirect taxes, levies, fees that all the governments collect from Oil, Gas & "ALL" of their byproducts as well as all the employees & companies involved. It is a tremendous amount of money, in fact could be considered "obscene".

The fact that so many politico's refuse to accept the 95% agreed science, risking everyone's future, including their own it's entirely mind boggling and the reasons (especially in the USA) are bordering insanity. Granted, they did elect Foghorn Leghorn which is all too telling on it's own.

Apr 28, 2019
"To achieve the Paris targets, oil consumption needs to begin declining dramatically in the next couple of years, according to estimates by the International Energy Agency"

If this is true then we are screwed. Trump plus Russia plus China plus India plus the Oil industry are all working against it. (Though surprisingly China are making the right noises as they want to control the future world renewables market.)


Exactly, but if any of these countries make a real effort, it would encourage others to follow. This is the main reason Trump is so bad. All the political crap (immigration etc etc) makes no difference in the long run. Trump's efforts on climate on the other hand are gleefully contributing to a mass extinction event that will take millions of years to recover from, probably without us.

Apr 28, 2019
Until I see major reduction in coal, cutting oil emissions is like trying to bail out the Titanic with a bucket. Why not go at the problem by cutting the largest (and it is the largest, by many times) source of emissions? Eliminate coal. Replace it with renewables. Then we can tackle the oilies.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more