Turn off a light, save a life, says new study

Turn off a light, save a life, says new UW-Madison study
Air pollution caused by emissions from power plants is known to contribute to an increased incidence of asthma attacks and other respiratory diseases in susceptible populations. Credit: Publicdomainpictures.net

We all know that turning off lights and buying energy-efficient appliances affects our financial bottom line. Now, according to a new study by University of Wisconsin-Madison researchers, we know that saving energy also saves lives and even more money for consumers by alleviating the costs of adverse health effects attributed to air pollution.

Writing this week in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, a team led by UW-Madison postdoctoral researcher David Abel tabulates both lives saved and cost benefits to consumers of improved due to reduced .

"By saving electricity, we can also save lives," says Abel, of the Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment in UW-Madison's Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. "There is a range of health benefits. It's a bonus. We find there are extra health reasons to turn off a light."

Abel and his colleagues, including senior author Tracey Holloway, also of the Nelson Institute, deployed a suite of three widely used models to calculate power plant emissions, air quality and human mortality over a span of three summer months, when is high. Their findings show that a 12 percent increase in summertime energy efficiency would reduce exposure to air pollution, specifically ozone and fine particulate matter. In short, cleaner air would save 475 each year in the United States, worth an estimated $4 billion.

That savings translates to almost 5 cents per kilowatt hour of energy used. That is a huge incentive, the Wisconsin team notes, given that electricity costs about 10 cents per kilowatt hour on average.

"We're trying to clarify how changes in energy systems have benefits for public health," explains Holloway, who is also a UW-Madison professor of atmospheric and oceanic sciences. "For the most part, the energy community is not focused on the human health effects of air pollution."

By showing the savings and how to accurately gauge the value of lives saved and associated reduced health care costs, the UW team hopes to provide policymakers and the energy industry with a road map for assessing the human health benefits of reducing energy use. Ideally, putting a price tag on positive health outcomes related to reduced energy adds a new impetus to the existing strategies used by government and the to help consumers save energy.

Air pollution such as ozone and fine particles caused by emissions from power plants adversely affect human health. They are known to contribute to an increased incidence of asthma attacks and other respiratory diseases in susceptible populations.

The project to quantify the human health benefits of saving energy, says Holloway, emerged from an undergraduate class project that found that only one state, Texas, had used energy efficiency to meet air pollution targets. Many counties across the United States fail to meet ozone and particulate standards, as required by the Environmental Protection Agency.

"This seems like a missed opportunity," says Holloway. "Energy efficiency is free, yet it is not being included in the basket of solutions."

An implicit goal of the new research, say Abel and Holloway, is to help build bridges between distinct sets of researchers and policymakers. In practice, people who focus on air pollution and those who focus on work in different worlds, the Wisconsin researchers say. Finding common threads and providing tools to integrate those different worlds will save money, improve human health, and equip government and industry to meet stated goals.

Explore further

In a warming world, could air conditioning make things worse?

More information: David W. Abel et al. Air Quality-Related Health Benefits of Energy Efficiency in the United States, Environmental Science & Technology (2019). DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.8b06417
Citation: Turn off a light, save a life, says new study (2019, March 20) retrieved 16 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-03-life.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Mar 21, 2019
And less use of energy means fewer energy jobs and fewer related jobs. Since energy jobs are high-paying, this means more poverty, which means more lower life expectancy for people. It all balances out.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more