When a generation loves a previous musical era: Millennials' recognition of 1960s-1990s songs is notable

February 6, 2019, New York University
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Millennials' recognition of songs from the 1960s through the 1990s is relatively stable over this 40-year period, a team of researchers has found. By contrast, their recognition of musical hits from 2000 to 2015, while higher overall than the previous era, diminishes rapidly over time.

"The 1960s to 1990s was a special time in music, reflected by a steady recognition of pieces of that era—even by today's millennials," observes Pascal Wallisch, a clinical assistant professor in New York University's Department of Psychology and the senior author of the study, which appears in the journal PLOS ONE.

While the researchers did not identify what explained the stable level of recognition for songs from the 1960s through the 1990s, they note that during this period there was a significantly greater diversity of songs reaching the top of the Billboard charts compared to 2000 to 2015 and 1940 to 1950. The large number of popular songs during the latter part of the 20th century may explain why so many are recognizable decades later.

However, the authors acknowledge that the findings could be the result of self-selection: there was a considerable correlation between the likelihood of recognizing a given song and its corresponding play count on Spotify, which they also measured. Yet, this result nonetheless underscores the popularity of certain songs from the 1960s through the end of the 20th century.

"Spotify was launched in 2008, well after nearly 90 percent of the songs we studied were released, which indicates are aware of the music that, in general, preceded their lives and are nonetheless choosing to listen to it," observes Wallisch.

But Wallisch and his colleagues emphasize that recognition of songs even from this period varies. Some were extremely well known, such as "When A Man Loves A Woman" by Percy Sledge (1966), "Baby Come Back" by Player (1977), and "The Tide is High" by Blondie (1980), whereas others, like "Knock Three Times" by Dawn (1970), "I'm Sorry" by John Denver (1975), and "Truly" by Lionel Richie (1982), are all but forgotten.

In selecting songs for their study, the researchers included those that reached the No. 1 spot on the Billboard "Top 100" between the years 1940 and 1957 and No. 1 on the Billboard "Hot 100" from 1958 to 2015.

The study's 643 participants included NYU students as well as others from the greater New York metropolitan area (the findings showed no statistical differences between the NYU and non-NYU groups). The sample was largely of young participants, with a mean age of 21.3 years and a median age of 20 years. The majority (88 percent) of this sample was between the ages of 18 and 25.

Each participant was presented with a random selection of seven out of the 152 songs in the sample, asked to listen to the selection, and report whether they recognized it. Participants were presented with 5-, 10- and 15-second excerpts deemed to be representative by a consensus panel of seven practicing musicians and professors of music theory and composition; these excerpts often contained a highly recognizable "lick"—a unique and often repeated pattern of notes played by a single instrument—of each song.

In response to hearing each song, participants were prompted to indicate whether they recognized it. The researchers then plotted the recognition proportion for each as a function of the year during which it reached peak popularity.

The results revealed three distinct phases in collective memory.

The first phase showed a steep linear drop-off in recognition for the music from this millennium, steadily declining, year by year, from 2015 to 2000; the second phase was marked by a stable plateau from the 1960s to the 1990s, with no notable decline during this 40-year period; and the third phase, similar to the first phase, was characterized by a more gradual drop-off during the 1940s and 1950s.

The paper's other authors included: Stephen Spivack, Sara Jordan Philibotte, Nathaniel Hugo Spilka, and Ian Joseph Passman—all undergraduates in NYU's College of Arts and Science at the time of the study.

Explore further: Computer analysis shows that popular music lyrics become angrier and sadder over time

Related Stories

A song's structure can be linked to its popularity

August 23, 2017

Think of your favourite pop song. Can you explain why you like it so much? It might remind you of a memorable event, or move you in a way that makes you feel happy or sad. A new study, published in the open-access journal ...

Young adults reminisce about music from before their time

September 9, 2013

Music has an uncanny way of bringing us back to a specific point in time, and each generation seems to have its own opinions about which tunes will live on as classics. New research suggests that young adults today are fond ...

Recommended for you

Where is the universe hiding its missing mass?

February 15, 2019

Astronomers have spent decades looking for something that sounds like it would be hard to miss: about a third of the "normal" matter in the Universe. New results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory may have helped them ...

What rising seas mean for local economies

February 15, 2019

Impacts from climate change are not always easy to see. But for many local businesses in coastal communities across the United States, the evidence is right outside their doors—or in their parking lots.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (3) Feb 07, 2019
Millennials' recognition of songs from the 1960s through the 1990s is relatively stable over this 40-year period, a team of researchers has found. By contrast, their recognition of musical hits from 2000 to 2015, while higher overall than the previous era, diminishes rapidly over time.

I stopped listening to music in the mid 90's. Stuff that made the charts had started to become vapid, productized, watered-down mish-mash of earlier decades.
When musicians, producers and labels started to make music for the largest possible target audience in order to make the most money (and when the look of the musicians became more important than the music itself) the "art" part of music died a sudden death.
not rated yet Feb 07, 2019
I agree with you about 95% on that (I take some exception with the metal genre)

And remember, in pop trash it's not stealing or plagiarizing... its "sampling"

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.