Palm oil not the only driver of forest loss in Indonesia

Palm oil not the only driver of forest loss in Indonesia
A new Duke study finds the causes of deforestation in Indonesia are far more varied than previously believed. Aerial images show forest loss caused by (1) large-scale oil palm plantations; (2) timber plantations; and (3) mining operations. Credit: 1) CNES/Airbus; 2) DigitalGlobe; 3) CNES/Airbus

Large-scale agriculture, primarily for growing oil palms, remains a major cause of deforestation in Indonesia, but its impact has diminished proportionately in recent years as other natural and human causes emerge, a new Duke University study finds.

"In the late 2000s, large-scale plantations were responsible for more than half of Indonesia's loss of primary natural forests," said Kemen G. Austin, a 2018 doctoral graduate of Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment, who led the study. "This trend peaked from 2008 to 2010, when an average of 600,000 hectares of forest was lost annually—57 percent of it driven by the expansion of these massive farms."

"From 2014 to 2016, an average of more than 800,000 hectares of primary forest was lost annually, but large-scale plantations accounted for only 25 percent of it," Austin said. "So although the overall rate of deforestation grew, other causes were responsible for most of it."

The conversion of forests to grasslands rose sharply in 2015 and 2016 when El Niño caused severe drought and higher-than-normal fire activity on many of the nation's islands, she noted.

Small-scale farming, which has largely been overshadowed by plantation-scale agriculture as a driver of deforestation, was also found to play a bigger role, accounting for about one-quarter of all forest loss. This suggests the importance of designing forest management interventions that take the values and requirements of small-holder farmers into account too, said Austin, who is now a senior policy analyst at RTI International.

Mining and logging roads were also found to be important drivers of deforestation at different times during the study, particularly on the local level.

"The takeaway message for policymakers and conservationists is that the causes of forest loss in Indonesia are much more varied than we previously thought. They change from place to place and over time," Austin said. "Even though oil palm is the first thing that pops into most people's head when they think about deforestation in Indonesia, it's not the only cause, and we need to adjust our policies and practices to account for that."

Austin and her colleagues published their peer-reviewed findings Feb. 1 in Environmental Research Letters.

Their study is the first to document the changing causes of deforestation occurring in Indonesia at the national scale and at the local level on each of the country's major developed islands. Some global studies previously have included nationwide data from Indonesia, Austin noted, but not at such a fine scale.

"Using 15 years of high-spatial-resolution Google Earth imagery and newly available global datasets on forest loss let us zero in on the causes of deforestation at each location and see how they vary from place to place and over time," Austin said. "For instance, logging is still driving on the island of Papua, but on Sumatra and Kalimantan, it's the oil palm industry and El Niño-driven fires that are the primary drivers."

Indonesia has experienced one of the highest rates of primary natural forest loss in the tropics in recent years. The loss of these forests—which absorb and store vast amounts of climate-warming , provide habitat for thousands of species, and help control erosion and flooding—has become a cause of global environmental concern.

The declining role of large-scale agriculture in causing loss of late may stem from the success of conservation policies the Indonesian government has put into place since 2011 and by voluntary commitments to sustainability by corporations that own or manage oil palm or timber plantations, Austin said. It could also be driven by economic factors, such as falling commodity prices or increased international competition.


Explore further

New study shows Indonesia's disastrous deforestation

More information: Kemen G Austin et al, What causes deforestation in Indonesia?, Environmental Research Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/aaf6db
Journal information: Environmental Research Letters

Provided by Duke University
Citation: Palm oil not the only driver of forest loss in Indonesia (2019, February 1) retrieved 20 April 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-02-palm-oil-driver-forest-loss.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
249 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 02, 2019
The explanations of the (cropped) photos from the article are incorrect. Should be: Large oil palm plantation, mining operations, and timber plantation. The image in the paper has many more images: https://iopscienc...aaf6dbf1 and labels for each.

Does the article misrepresent the paper? Good question. I read the paper as saying that the degree of forest/carbon loss is slowing, not so much due to enlightened policies but constant use in the new economic modes. However, there is a significant degree of carbon sinking that is ignored here. Palm oil, timber, and other crops grown for export also export significant amounts of carbon. Is this retained or converted to CO2 in its end use? Palm oil probably is most consumed/converted, hardwood lumber may last over a century if converted into fine furniture.

Feb 02, 2019
the causes of forest loss in Indonesia are much more varied
No, its not. Its just too uncomfortable for the common academie to discuss.

"2016, the fertility rate... 2.36 children per woman."

"...also the world's most populous Muslim-majority country, as just over 87% of Indonesians declared Muslim on the 2010 census"

"Birth rate was healthy compared to the death rate too and based on a 2012 estimate, it's believed that there are 17.76 births per 1,000 people compared to just 6.28 deaths. Add in a loss of 1.08 people to net migration and you have a total annual growth rate of 1.04%... That final figure of 1.04% may not seem like a lot but on a population of over 250 million, it leads to some significant increases. As the Jakarta Post reported in 2013, Indonesia's population has doubled within just 40 years... the high Muslim population in Indonesia is leading to a very high birth rate, which cannot be sustained."

-Same with Brazil, india etc. RELIGION is the cause.

Feb 04, 2019
That final figure of 1.04% may not seem like a lot but on a population of over 250 million, it leads to some significant increases

To ease your troubled mind, U.S. population growth has averaged about 1% since the 1960's but forest cover has grown during that same period. The reason? eachus mentions it. Changing economics.

U.S. forest area declined roughly 25% from 1630 to 1910. By 2012, it had increased about 1.5% while the population tripled.

https://www.fia.f...lish.pdf

In 1910, farmers made up over 30% of the labor force. Now they make up about 2.5%. Agriculture has become more efficient. Timber companies replant trees, renewing their resource.

This demographic shift is true in every country that transitions from a poor, subsistence-level economy to a wealthy post-industrial economy. It's happening in Indonesia too.

Feb 04, 2019
To ease your troubled mind, U.S. population growth has averaged about 1% since the 1960's but forest cover has grown during that same period. The reason? eachus mentions it. Changing economics
What makes you think that comparing Indonesia to the US makes any sense at all?

BTW those troubled minds belong to the experts I quoted. Google it.

Feb 04, 2019
They, of course, omit the AGW Cult's responsibility in this.
https://www.dw.co...42268325

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more