Introduced daisy changes its appearance on Australian beaches, defying evolutionary expectations

February 20, 2019, University of New South Wales
Introduced daisy changes its appearance on Australian beaches, defying evolutionary expectations
The beach daisy (Arctotheca populifolia) was introduced to Australian beaches in the 1930s. Credit: Claire Brandenburger

In less than a century since it was introduced to Australia, the South African beach daisy has drastically changed its appearance – a clear and unusual example of rapid evolution in plants, a new study led by UNSW scientists has shown.

A species of beach daisy from South Africa has undergone substantial and unexpected changes since arriving in Australia in the 1930s, a new study led by UNSW researchers has uncovered.

The findings published today in Proceedings of the Royal Society B present a significant example of in plants, showing how an can rapidly change in a new environment, away from its native habitat and herbivores.

Using genetics to go back to the beginning

The beach daisy (Arctotheca populifolia) was introduced to Australia from its native South Africa in a bid to prevent coastal sand dunes from eroding. It is now a common sight along sand dunes in Australia, with distinctive silvery woolly leaves and yellow flowers.

In an earlier study, the research team had already harvested beach daisy seeds along coastal regions in South Africa and Australia, and then generated genetic maps of each population.

They did this by locating shared microsatellites – short sequences of DNA that are repeated in multiple locations in the genome of an organism.

For the study released today, the researchers used genetics to figure out exactly which beach in South Africa the current Australian plants came from, drawing a direct genetic link between the original and introduced populations.

"It's a key step that we got the parent population, because that is extremely rare and enables us to make the most precise evolutionary comparisons," says Claire Brandenburger, lead author and Ph.D. student at UNSW Sydney.

Keeping its baby face

After establishing the genetic link, they then grew the plants over two generations to observe how the South African plants would grow in comparison to the Australian plants, all in controlled conditions in the glasshouse UNSW's Sydney campus.

Introduced daisy changes its appearance on Australian beaches, defying evolutionary expectations
After less a century, the appearance of the introduced population of beach daisies in Australia (right) was drastically different compared to the original South African population (left). Credit: Claire Brandenburger

The results of the glasshouse experiments reveal that less than a hundred years since its arrival, the morphology of the beach daisy population in Australia is strikingly different compared with the parent population in South Africa.

Young plants from both South African and Australian beach daisy populations have leaves with a simple broad, rounded shape like a spade. When the plants reach adulthood, they start to look very different in South African beach daisy populations, with adult leaves developing distinctive lobes around the perimeter. But to the research team's surprise, in the introduced population of Australian beach daisies, the plants didn't develop their lobed adult leaf form and instead kept the young spade-like form.

This is a phenomenon known as 'paedomorphosis' – meaning 'keeping its child-like form' – where an organism keeps juvenile traits when it reaches adulthood.

"This study is a powerful approach of looking for changes and testing for theories – and so this is one of the reasons why we had such distinctive results," Ms Brandenburger says.

"If a naturalist had seen these two plants 200 years ago, they would have probably described them as different species because they look so distinctive.

"We're not sure whether this is an adaptive change – that is, whether the shape changed to adapt to the landscape – or genetic drift, where by chance the gene that says 'become a lobed adult plant,' might have been switched off in Australian plants."

Against all evolutionary predictions

Somewhat surprisingly, the team also showed how the plant developed smaller, thicker leaves in Australia and a low, sprawling growth form.

Usually, introduced plants would be predicted to follow the EICA (Evolution of Increased Competitive Ability) hypothesis.

"The EICA hypothesis offers an explanation for how introduced species can suddenly seem to be doing so well. When plants leave their original home, they leave a lot of enemies behind," says Ms Brandenburger.

"When they arrive in a new environment, instead of wasting energy defending themselves, they now have extra resources which they can put into growth, reproduction and competition – usually resulting in bigger leaves and taller plants."

Introduced daisy changes its appearance on Australian beaches, defying evolutionary expectations
PhD student Claire Brandenburger tends to the beach daisies in the UNSW Sydney Campus glasshouse. Credit: Claire Brandenburger

However, against the prediction of the research team and the EICA theory, the Australian daisy population was revealed to be more conservative with a low and spreading growth form and smaller, thicker leaves similar to succulents – consistent with adaptation to a drier climate. This was despite rainfall being 2-3 times higher in the Australian study sites, compared to the South African one.

The authors say the study is a starting point and they need to go further to see if the change in appearances is associated with any evolutionary advantages.

"We need more research to find out why this is happening. More evidence is coming out showing that when there is a selective pressure in place, plants and animals can change really, really fast," says co-author Professor Angela Moles.

Rapid evolution – bad news or good news?

The plant's level of change in under a century shows how species can become invasive.

"This plant has massively changed in less than a century. This means they are evolving to get better at growing in Australia, which means they may get more invasive as time goes on," says Professor Moles.

The study also shows that we shouldn't underestimate the adaptability of plants to rapidly changing conditions, such as climate change.

With climate change, plants aren't usually able to migrate like animals that move in search of more favourable conditions.

"We're worried about native plant species changing in response to climate change, but this study might actually offer a little line of hope that maybe if there is a big selective pressure that some plant species will be better able to respond to it than we thought," says Professor Moles.

"People often assume that with climate change plants are doomed. But we're showing that hopefully in general will be able to adapt very quickly," adds Ms Brandenburger.

"So maybe there is hope."

Explore further: Introduced plants 'becoming Australian'

More information: Claire R. Brandenburger et al. Rapid reshaping: the evolution of morphological changes in an introduced beach daisy, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (2019). DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.1713

Related Stories

Introduced plants 'becoming Australian'

January 31, 2011

( -- A number of introduced plant species have become more like natives, suggesting rapid evolution could happen far more frequently than previously thought, according to new research from UNSW.

Aussie plants facing extinction

January 31, 2019

The top 100 Australian plant species at risk of extinction have been identified by Threatened Species Recovery Hub research.

Study shows how plants evolve for faster growth

December 20, 2018

Scientists at the University of Sheffield have taken a step forward in understanding how evolution has changed the photosynthesis process in wild plants to help them grow more rapidly.

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

Paleontologists report world's biggest Tyrannosaurus rex

March 22, 2019

University of Alberta paleontologists have just reported the world's biggest Tyrannosaurus rex and the largest dinosaur skeleton ever found in Canada. The 13-metre-long T. rex, nicknamed "Scotty," lived in prehistoric Saskatchewan ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.9 / 5 (9) Feb 20, 2019
Adaptation. Not evolution. There is a huge difference. The former is always happening. The latter (which implies new genes being formed) has never been observed.
5 / 5 (2) Feb 21, 2019
The origin of new species by evolution has also been observed, both in the laboratory and in the wild. See, for example, (Weinberg, J.R., V.R. Starczak, and D. Jorg, 1992, "Evidence for rapid speciation following a founder event in the laboratory." Evolution 46: 1214-1220). The "Observed Instances of Speciation" FAQ in the archives gives several additional examples.
5 / 5 (1) Feb 21, 2019
The origin of new species by evolution has also been observed, both in the laboratory and in the wild. See, for example, (Weinberg, J.R., V.R. Starczak, and D. Jorg, 1992, "Evidence for rapid speciation following a founder event in the laboratory." Evolution 46: 1214-1220). The "Observed Instances of Speciation" FAQ in the archives gives several additional examples
Bart knows this but refuses to accept it.

Thats what faith is - belief despite evidence.

"Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has; it never comes to the aid of spiritual things, but more frequently than not struggles against the divine Word, treating with contempt all that emanates from God."

-Martin Luther
5 / 5 (1) Feb 21, 2019
Evolution. With adaptation. Not that there is a huge difference. Simply read the article!

@dnorth: In fact nowadays *anyone* can learn to observe it in a few hours from their laptop! For example the NCBI database has free software, free databases and free tutorials enabling making a [simplest: protein] tree testing evolution. And of course in the process observe "new genes" if they want to look at paralogs (as we did on a lab in school).

This is why the trolls looks so ridiculous, since they obviously will not look at the evidence - including here not reading the article - and today that forces them to obviously give up. (And in the process show that they have not studied biology at all as the troll here must have missed out on.)

But the simplest way is to ignore them. Science and education is making progress (women now as studied as men), superstition like religion is waning (whole Europa now secular).
5 / 5 (1) Feb 21, 2019
(I now note the irony that I did not ignore, then suggest ignoring simplest. I plead lack of coffee for my grumps, it is also a matter of keeping sane in the face of the insane, sometimes you have to react. Even if not simplest.

Aaanyway, boring trolls are insane but boring.)

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.