Can we address climate change without sacrificing water quality?

Can we address climate change without sacrificing water quality?
Phytoplankton bloom off the Atlantic coast. Credit: NASA Earth Observatory, by Joshua Stevens

Strategies for limiting climate change must take into account their potential impact on water quality through nutrient overload, according to a new study from Carnegie's Eva Sinha and Anna Michalak published by Nature Communications. Some efforts at reducing carbon emissions could actually increase the risk of water quality impairments, they found.

Rainfall and other precipitation wash nutrients from human activities like agriculture into waterways. When waterways get overloaded with nutrients, a dangerous phenomenon called eutrophication can occur, which can sometime lead to toxin-producing or low-oxygen dead zones called hypoxia.

For several years, Sinha and Michalak have been studying the effects of nitrogen runoff and the ways that expected changes in rainfall patterns due to could lead to severe impairments.

In this latest work, they analyzed how an array of different societal decisions about , development, agriculture, and climate mitigation could affect the already complex equation of projecting future risks to quality throughout the continental U.S. They then factored in how climate change-related differences in precipitation patterns would additionally contribute to this overall water quality risk.

They found that climate change mitigation efforts that rely heavily on biofuels could have the unintended consequence of increasing the amount of nitrogen entering U.S. waterways, causing water quality problems. Scenarios that required a large expansion of domestic food production would fare even worse, by increasing both fossil fuel emissions and water quality problems.

But win-win solutions are also possible.

"It is entirely possible to fight climate change in ways that don't have unintended consequences for water quality," Michalak emphasized. "We need an approach that takes multiple benefits into account in the planning process."

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the most successful scenarios considered in the study relied on sustainable growth and conservation.

Looking at regional differences within the U.S., Sinha and Michalak found that the impact of excess nitrogen due to both land management decisions and climate-change-related precipitation changes would be the strongest in the Northeast.

Globally, Asia would be at the greatest risk of eutrophication due to projected increases in fertilizer use and anticipated precipitation increases.

"Our findings show that it is crucial to consider the potential for water quality impairments when making societal choices about how land is used and developed, as well as about how we work to fight change," Sinha said. "Access to clean water is essential for human survival, food and energy production, and a healthy ecosystem. Preserving our ability to access clean water must be a top priority."


Explore further

Projected precipitation increases are bad news for water quality

More information: E. Sinha et al, Societal decisions about climate mitigation will have dramatic impacts on eutrophication in the 21st century, Nature Communications (2019). DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-08884-w
Journal information: Nature Communications

Citation: Can we address climate change without sacrificing water quality? (2019, February 26) retrieved 21 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-02-climate-sacrificing-quality.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
409 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Feb 26, 2019
studying the effects of nitrogen runoff and the ways that expected changes in rainfall patterns due to climate change could lead to severe water quality impairments

To sum up:

a.) we have no idea what the "expected changes in rainfall patterns" will be because
b.) the climate models are inaccurate because
c.) they don't (and probably never can) include all the inputs and variables or have enough spatial precision to accurately represent global climate, besides
d.) the global climate system is non-linear and chaotic, therefore highly unpredictable.

In other words, we're studying the effects of nitrogen runoff based on the imagined changes in rainfall patterns (that no one can predict) that may or may not lead to severe water quality impairments.

There, fixed it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more