Scientists discover a process that stabilizes fusion plasmas

January 9, 2019 by John Greenwald, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
Physicists Allan Reiman, left, and Nat Fisch. Credit: Elle Starkman/PPPL Office of Communications

Scientists seeking to bring the fusion reaction that powers the sun and stars to Earth must keep the superhot plasma free from disruptions. Now researchers at the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) have discovered a process that can help to control the disruptions thought to be most dangerous.

Replicating fusion, which releases boundless energy by fusing atomic nuclei in the state of matter known as plasma, could produce clean and virtually limitless power for generating electricity for cities and industries everywhere. Capturing and controlling fusion energy is therefore a key scientific and engineering challenge for researchers across the globe.

Creating magnetic islands

The PPPL finding, reported in Physical Review Letters, focuses on so-called tearing modes—instabilities in the plasma that create magnetic islands, a key source of plasma disruptions. These islands, bubble-like structures that form in the plasma, can grow and trigger disruptive events that halt fusion reactions and damage doughnut-shaped facilities called "tokamaks" that house the reactions.

Researchers found in the 1980s that using radio-frequency (RF) waves to drive current in the plasma could stabilize tearing modes and reduce the risk of disruptions. However, the researchers failed to notice that small changes—or perturbations—in the temperature of the plasma could improve the stabilization process, once a key threshold in power is exceeded. The physical mechanism that PPPL has identified works like this:

  • The temperature perturbations affect the strength of the current drive and the amount of RF power deposited in the islands.
  • The perturbations and their impact on the deposition of power feedback against each other in a complex—or nonlinear—manner.
  • When the feedback combines with the sensitivity of the current drive to temperature perturbations, the efficiency of the stabilization process increases.
  • Furthermore, the improved stabilization is less to likely to be affected by misaligned current drives that fail to hit the center of the island.

The overall impact of this process creates what is technically called "RF current condensation," or concentration of RF power inside the island that keeps it from growing. "The power deposition is greatly increased," said Allan Reiman, a theoretical physicist at PPPL and lead author of the paper. "When the power deposition in the island exceeds a threshold level, there is a jump in the temperature that greatly strengthens the stabilizing effect. This allows the stabilization of larger islands than previously thought possible."

Beneficial to ITER

This process can be particularly beneficial to ITER, the international tokamak under construction in France to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion . "There is worry about islands getting large and causing disruptions in ITER," Reiman said. "Taken together, these new effects should make it easier to stabilize ITER plasmas."

Reiman worked with Professor Nat Fisch, associate director for academic affairs at PPPL and coauthor of the report. Fisch had demonstrated in a landmark 1970s paper that RF waves could be used to drive currents to confine tokamak plasmas through a process now called "RF current drive."

Fisch points out how "it was Reiman's groundbreaking paper in 1983 that predicted that these RF currents could also stabilize tearing modes. The use of RF current drive for stabilization of tearing modes was perhaps even more crucial to the tokamak program than using these currents to confine the ," Fisch said.

"Hence," he said, "Reiman's 1983 paper essentially launched experimental campaigns on tokamaks worldwide to stabilize tearing modes." Moreover, he added, "Significantly, in addition to predicting the stabilization of tearing modes by RF, the 1983 paper also pointed out the importance of the temperature perturbation in ."

Underappreciated feature

The new paper takes a fresh look at the impact of these temperature perturbations on the islands, a feature which has been underappreciated since the 1983 paper pointed to it. "We basically went back 35 years to carry that thought just a bit further by exploring the fascinating physics and larger implications of positive feedback," Fisch said. "It turned out that these implications might now be very important to the tokamak program today."

The theoreticians began their recent work with a simple model and advanced to more complex ones to address the key issues. They now plan to produce a more detailed picture with still-more sophisticated models. They are also working to suggest experimental campaigns that will expose these new effects. Support for this research comes from the DOE Office of Science.

Explore further: Team wins major supercomputer time to study the edge of fusion plasmas

More information: A. H. Reiman et al, Suppression of Tearing Modes by Radio Frequency Current Condensation, Physical Review Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.225001

Related Stories

Higher plasma densities, more efficient tokamaks

August 21, 2018

When the density of the hot, ionized gas (known as a plasma) in a tokamak exceeds a certain limit, it usually leads to a rapid loss of heat and plasma currents. The currents are required to confine the plasma. Such events ...

Recommended for you

Sculpting stable structures in pure liquids

February 21, 2019

Oscillating flow and light pulses can be used to create reconfigurable architecture in liquid crystals. Materials scientists can carefully engineer concerted microfluidic flows and localized optothermal fields to achieve ...

How to freeze heat conduction

February 21, 2019

Physicists have discovered a new effect, which makes it possible to create excellent thermal insulators which conduct electricity. Such materials can be used to convert waste heat into electrical energy.

Water is more homogeneous than expected

February 21, 2019

In order to explain the known anomalies in water, some researchers assume that water consists of a mixture of two phases, even under ambient conditions. However, new X-ray spectroscopic analyses at BESSY II, ESRF and Swiss ...

Correlated nucleons may solve 35-year-old mystery

February 20, 2019

A careful re-analysis of data taken at the Department of Energy's Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility has revealed a possible link between correlated protons and neutrons in the nucleus and a 35-year-old mystery. ...

11 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Parsec
4.4 / 5 (7) Jan 09, 2019
Absolutely cool! Maybe in 20 years or so we could have a working fusion reactor!
pntaylor
3.7 / 5 (3) Jan 09, 2019
Absolutely cool! Maybe in 20 years or so we could have a working fusion reactor!


Maybe, in 100 years or so we can have power like the Krell had.
Just have to watch out for those "monsters from the id".
katesisco
not rated yet Jan 09, 2019
Thinking maybe this is because we don't have enough power to create a pressure that would itself be stabilizing. This is why our stars are round, after all. All that plasma focus into a point.
rrwillsj
3 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2019
Good quote kate.

& what pills it all together into that point?

Yep, Gravity Rules!
Mark Thomas
5 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2019
When the power deposition in the island exceeds a threshold level, there is a jump in the temperature that greatly strengthens the stabilizing effect. This allows the stabilization of larger islands than previously thought possible.


Sounds good, and I have tremendous respect for the folks at PPPL, so let's hope this advance makes a real difference.

If only we didn't have to wait until 2035 to test this out on a real D-T plasma at ITER.

https://www.iter....e/-/3121

joel in oakland
5 / 5 (1) Jan 09, 2019
"Absolutely cool! Maybe in 20 years or so we could have a working fusion reactor!"

Then maybe in 30 years people will stop calling them tomahawks.
EyeNStein
5 / 5 (1) Jan 10, 2019
Sounds like PPPL have saved ITER's bacon again.
The article sounds like the larger size of the ITER would have lead to larger 'islands' in the plasma otherwise.
Bert_Halls
not rated yet Jan 11, 2019
I never understood the aggressive disregard for Polywells.
EyeNStein
not rated yet Jan 12, 2019
There are a bunch of institutions, many funded by the US Navy, experimenting and advancing polywell type devices.
If their hype is to be believed we should see demonstrations of viability in 2019 or 2020.
https://en.wikipe...ell#2016

(Though these institutions have a track record of producing intriguing but inconclusive results about one week before their funding runs out.)
DRoseDARs
5 / 5 (1) Jan 13, 2019
"Absolutely cool! Maybe in 20 years or so we could have a working fusion reactor!"


Then maybe in 30 years people will stop calling them tomahawks.


That'll happen about 5 years after Uranus is renamed Urectum to end that stupid joke once and for all...
alwaysagentleman
not rated yet Jan 14, 2019
Only 20 years away and always will be.

Thorium.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.