Steady as she goes: Scientists tame damaging plasma instabilities in fusion facilities

August 22, 2018 by John Greewald, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
PPPL physicist Raffi Nazikian, left, and General Atomics physicist Craig Petty in front of a model cross-section of the DIII-D tokamak. Credit: Greg Cunningham/General Atomics Energy Group

Before scientists can capture and recreate the fusion process that powers the sun and stars to produce virtually limitless energy on Earth, they must first learn to control the hot plasma gas that fuels fusion reactions. In a set of recent experiments, scientists have tamed a plasma instability in a way that could lead to the efficient and steady state operation of ITER, the international experiment under construction in France to demonstrate the feasibility of fusion power. Such continuous operation will be essential for future fusion devices.

Fusion powers the sun and stars by fusing light elements in the form of —the hot, charged state of matter composed of free electrons and atomic nuclei—to produce massive amounts of energy. Scientists are seeking to replicate on Earth for a virtually inexhaustible supply of electricity-generating power.

The most recent findings, developed by a team of researchers led by physicist Raffi Nazikian of the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) and Craig Petty of General Atomics, stem from experiments conducted on the DIII-D National Fusion Facility operated by General Atomics for the DOE in San Diego. The results build on earlier work led by DIII-D scientists that demonstrated the conditions needed for steady-state operation of the core of ITER plasmas and established techniques to control these plasma instabilities.

The new research targets instabilities called Edge Localized Modes (ELMs) that develop at the periphery of fusion plasmas. Such instabilities can cause periodic heat bursts that can damage plasma-facing components in a tokamak. "In these results we observe the suppression of large ELMs, leaving small benign ELMs in plasmas that overlap with the conditions required for steady-state ITER operation," said Nazikian, lead author of a scientific paper in IAEA's Nuclear Fusion journal that lays out the findings. "These new experiments are a great example of successfully combining two separate advances, in this case 100 percent current drive in the plasma core and large ELM suppression in the edge, in an efficient and effective manner" said Petty, lead author of a prior Nuclear Fusion paper on the DIII-D findings relevant to the steady state core of the ITER plasma.

To keep large ELMs from occurring, researchers produce small magnetic ripples known as resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) that distort the smooth doughnut shape of tokamak plasmas. In the recent experiments, the scientists found that increasing the overall pressure of the plasma makes the plasma far more responsive to the ripples to better control ELMs and produce the conditions needed for steady-state ITER operation.

The higher pressure also increases a self-generated current that forms inside tokamak plasmas. This can be combined with particle beams and microwaves to drive and sustain the plasma current indefinitely in a so-called steady state. These higher self-generated currents make this process more efficient, and thus a plant more attractive.

When researchers projected the recent DIII-D results to ITER, they found that the higher plasma pressure and bootstrap current, together with additional sources of current from particle beams and microwaves, could create a fully sustainable steady-state regime that generates four-to-five times more power than it will take to heat the plasma and drive the current. Support for this work comes from the DOE Office of Science (FES) and the General Atomics Postdoctoral Research Participation Program administered by Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU).

Going forward, physicists seek to create a greater percentage of bootstrap current to increase the fusion power gain and reduce the additional needed to drive current. These DIII-D experiments produced about 30 percent self-driven current, although the bootstrap current fraction are projected to increase in ITER as its higher field means its ions collide less often, enabling current to be driven more easily.

"What we are currently working on in DIII-D is to develop the basis for fully steady-state high pressure plasma for ITER and beyond," Nazikian said. "A central goal of the DIII-D program now is to identify ways in which high-pressure plasmas can drive most of the current required for steady-state reactors. We are undertaking major upgrades to the facility to meet this goal while exploring regimes that are free of dangerous ELMs."

Explore further: No more zigzags: Scientists uncover mechanism that stabilizes fusion plasmas

More information: R. Nazikian et al, Grassy-ELM regime with edge resonant magnetic perturbations in fully noninductive plasmas in the DIII-D tokamak, Nuclear Fusion (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/aad20d

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Mechanism helps explain the ear's exquisite sensitivity

January 16, 2019

The human ear, like those of other mammals, is so extraordinarily sensitive that it can detect sound-wave-induced vibrations of the eardrum that move by less than the width of an atom. Now, researchers at MIT have discovered ...

Understanding insulators with conducting edges

January 16, 2019

Insulators that are conducting at their edges hold promise for interesting technological applications. However, until now their characteristics have not been fully understood. Physicists at Goethe University have now modelled ...

1 comment

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 23, 2018
I'm still confused why we try so hard to achieve nuclear fusion by maintaining hot plasma. It is a process similar to the one in critical nuclear fission reactors, only that one is easier to achieve (essentially nothing has to be done if the right fuel is placed inside). But with nuclear fusion it would seem easier to produce energy by heating the plasma shortly, fusing it and then letting it cool (or discarding it). Why isn't this considered the most promising way to breakeven?

I don't mean the current tokamak/stellarator work is futile; it is not, as it allows us to understand plasma physics. But to me it is not clear why it is better than inertial confinement/focus fusion or other "fire and forget" approaches.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.