Surprising hidden order unites prime numbers and crystal-like materials

September 6, 2018 by Kevin Mcelwee, Princeton University
Princeton University researchers have uncovered patterns in prime numbers that are similar to those found in the positions of atoms inside certain crystal-like materials. Credit: Kyle McKernan, Office of Communications

The seemingly random digits known as prime numbers are not nearly as scattershot as previously thought. A new analysis by Princeton University researchers has uncovered patterns in primes that are similar to those found in the positions of atoms inside certain crystal-like materials.

The researchers found a surprising similarity between the sequence of primes over long stretches of the number line and the that results from shining X-rays on a material to reveal the inner arrangement of its atoms. The analysis could lead to predicting primes with high accuracy, said the researchers. The study was published Sept. 5 in the Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment.

"There is much more order in than ever previously discovered," said Salvatore Torquato, Princeton's Lewis Bernard Professor of Natural Sciences, professor of chemistry and the Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials. "We showed that the primes behave almost like a crystal or, more precisely, similar to a crystal-like material called a 'quasicrystal.'"

Primes are numbers that can only be divided by 1 and themselves. Very large primes are the building blocks of many cryptography systems. Primes appear to be sprinkled randomly along the number line, although mathematicians have discerned some order. The first few primes are 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11, becoming more sporadic higher in the number line.

Torquato and his colleagues have found that that, when considered over large swaths of the number line, prime numbers are more ordered than previously believed, falling within the class of patterns known as "hyperuniformity."

Hyperuniform materials have special order at large distances and include crystals, quasicrystals and special disordered systems. Hyperuniformity is found in the arrangement of cone cells in bird eyes, in certain rare meteorites, and in the large-scale structure of the universe.

The team showed that the order they found in the prime numbers maps to the pattern that results when X-rays interact with certain forms of matter. As a chemist, Torquato is familiar with X-ray crystallography, shining X-rays through a crystal's three-dimensional atomic lattice. With diamonds or other crystals, this will result in a predictable pattern of bright spots or peaks, known as Bragg peaks.

Compared to typical , quasicrystals yield a distinct and more complex arrangement of Bragg peaks. The peaks in a typical crystal form at regular intervals with empty gaps between them. In quasicrystals, between any two selected Bragg peaks is another Bragg peak.

esearchers at Princeton have discovered a similarity between the patterns of atoms in certain crystal-like materials and prime numbers. Here, red dots denote non-prime numbers and black dots denote prime numbers, which are treated as “atoms.”. Credit: Image courtesy of the researchers

The pattern that Torquato and his colleagues discovered in the primes is similar to that of quasicrystals and another system called limit-periodic order, but it differs enough that the researchers call it "effectively limit-periodic" order. The prime numbers appear in "self-similar" groupings, meaning that between peaks of certain heights, there are groupings of smaller peaks, and so on.

The team discovered strong indications of such a pattern using computer simulations to see what would happen if prime numbers were treated like a string of atoms subjected to X-rays. In work published in the Journal of Physics A in February, the researchers reported finding a surprising pattern of Bragg-like peaks, indicating that the prime patterns were highly ordered.

The current study uses number theory to provide a theoretical foundation for those previous numerical experiments. The researchers realized that although primes appear random over short intervals, Torquato said, at sufficiently long stretches of the number line, sense can be made out of otherwise seemingly chaotic numbers.

"When you go to that distinguished limit, 'Boom!'" he said, snapping his fingers. "The ordered structure pops out."

Torquato co-authored the paper with Ge Zhang, who earned his doctorate in chemistry in 2017, and mathematics graduate student Matthew de Courcy-Ireland.

De Courcy-Ireland said that similar numerical patterns were described by the "circle method" developed nearly a century ago to find patterns in primes. "For me, what is interesting is taking these results that go back to 1922 and reformulating them in some way that gives you a new example, a system with a bunch of properties that is very interesting, and one that maybe could point the way to where you could look for more physical examples," he said.

The discovery may aid research in both mathematics and materials science. "Prime numbers have beautiful structural properties, including unexpected order, hyperuniformity and effective limit-periodic behavior," said Torquato. "The primes teach us about a completely new state of matter."

"What's fascinating about this paper is that it gives us a different perspective on the primes: instead of viewing them as numbers, we can view them as particles and try to map out their structure via X-ray diffraction," said Henry Cohn, a principal researcher at Microsoft Research who was not involved with the study. "It turns out to give us the same sort of information as traditional number-theoretic methods, and to tie in beautifully with previous work. It's a beautiful new perspective on this information, and it opens up new connections with materials science and scattering theory."

The study, "Uncovering multiscale order in the prime numbers via scattering," was published in the Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment on Sept. 5.

Explore further: Mathematician pair find prime numbers aren't as random as thought

More information: S Torquato et al. Uncovering multiscale order in the prime numbers via scattering, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment (2018). DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/aad6be

Related Stories

GIMPS project discovers largest known prime number

January 4, 2018

The Great Internet Mersenne Prime Search (GIMPS) has discovered the largest known prime number, 277,232,917-1, having 23,249,425 digits. A computer volunteered by Jonathan Pace made the find on December 26, 2017.

Recommended for you

Fiber optic sensor measures tiny magnetic fields

September 19, 2018

Researchers have developed a light-based technique for measuring very weak magnetic fields, such as those produced when neurons fire in the brain. The inexpensive and compact sensors could offer an alternative to the magnetic ...

The hunt for leptoquarks is on

September 19, 2018

Matter is made of elementary particles, and the Standard Model of particle physics states that these particles occur in two families: leptons (such as electrons and neutrinos) and quarks (which make up protons and neutrons). ...

Searching for errors in the quantum world

September 19, 2018

The theory of quantum mechanics is well supported by experiments. Now, however, a thought experiment by ETH physicists yields unexpected contradictions. These findings raise some fundamental questions—and they're polarising ...

Researchers push the boundaries of optical microscopy

September 19, 2018

The field of optical microscopy research has developed rapidly in recent years. Thanks to the invention of a technique called super-resolution fluorescence microscopy, it has recently become possible to view even the smaller ...

Extremely small and fast: Laser ignites hot plasma

September 19, 2018

When light pulses from an extremely powerful laser system are fired onto material samples, the electric field of the light rips the electrons off the atomic nuclei. For fractions of a second, a plasma is created. The electrons ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (4) Sep 06, 2018
1 / 5 (3) Sep 06, 2018
There is a point I have been trying to get some attention to for some time.
If p(i) is the i'th prime number, pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, and [] is the greatest integer function, then the scattershot graph of (p(i)/pi) – [p(i)/pi] forms a pattern of repeating pencils of ten straight lines with a single empty space between pencils. This doesn't happen with any other value. Some examination seems to indicate that a sum of terms of the form f(sin(j)), where f is some function and j goes from 1 to i, multiplied by ln(i)^a/((i^(1/pi))^b) is close to some constant multiplied by p(i).
3 / 5 (1) Sep 07, 2018
But still no proof of patterns in large primes.
3.7 / 5 (3) Sep 07, 2018
scattershot graph...

maybe you should first try to use words that have meaning. If you are trying to use a scatter plot then that is not what you think it is.

The rest of your post is...meaningless BS (as per usual).
1 / 5 (1) Sep 08, 2018
julianpenrod, you're right. That's an interesting effect. It's true for Pi and 2*Pi, and maybe slightly for 3*Pi. But it isn't true for Pi/2, E, sqrt(pi), sqrt(2), sqrt(3), sqrt(5), sqrt(7), sqrt(9), sqrt(10), E+0.4,or other numbers I tried.

There has been substantial work done on that function through the centuries, so there's a good chance this is already known. But I don't know that literature well enough to say. If anyone is interested in replicating the result, you can notice the white diagonal lines in the first image in the results of this Mathematica code:

Prime[i]/# - Floor[Prime[i]/#], {i, 100000000, 100001000}],
ImageSize -> 300] & /@ {Pi, E, Sqrt[2], Sqrt[3], Sqrt[5], Sqrt[7],
Sqrt[10], Sqrt[Pi], E + .4, Pi/2, 2 Pi, 3*Pi, 3.134567}

I don't think I'll pursue it further. But if I did, I'd check: is it ALWAYS every 10th line missing? Or maybe sometimes the 11th? or 9th?
not rated yet Sep 08, 2018
Looking more closely, the effect does occur for Pi/2 and 3Pi/2, though the slope of the lines is different. More interesting: the effect is clearly visible for the rational number 3.1415926 but completely absent for 3.1515926, even though they only differ by one in the second decimal place. And the rational number 3.1425926 has a similar effect that is even stronger, even though it differs only by one in the third place. Very interesting.

Some interesting questions: what is the slope of each line? Where on the x axis does each line start? For a given point on the x axis, is there any way to predict which of the roughly 10 lines above it will have a dot? And is it always 10 lines between missing lines, or is it sometimes 9 or 11 between them?

This is clearly a real relationship between Pi and the distribution of the primes. It would be helpful if someone with some knowledge of number theory could give some references to the literature with this or something related.
not rated yet Sep 10, 2018
There is a point I have been trying to get some attention to for some time.
If p(i) is the i'th prime number, pi is the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, and [] is the greatest integer function, then the scattershot graph of (p(i)/pi) – [p(i)/pi] forms a pattern of repeating pencils of ten straight lines with a single empty space between pencils. This doesn't happen with any other value.

That indeed happens, and other multiples of pi work too. 7*pi gives an extremely clear picture of the phenomenon.

Here's a Scilab code for it:
Ntot=1e5; Nin=1; a=0.0; b=7; P=primes(Ntot);x=P/(b*(%pi-a));y=x-floor(x); clf; plot(y(1,Nin:$),'d');

To me, this reminds of the Ulam spiral. That may be the connection.
not rated yet Sep 10, 2018
Also, rational multiples like 7/5*pi work.
1 / 5 (1) Sep 15, 2018
prime numbers to predict new materials seems to be promising. I'll have research this since i have generated time altered materials thru my own research
not rated yet Sep 17, 2018
Is the occurrence of the prime-like distribution patterns in the results perhaps something to do with orchard (or lattice) problems - Riemann Zeta function stuff - in mathematics, and so inevitable as opposed to insightful?
not rated yet Sep 17, 2018
It looks like the missing lines have nothing to do with primes. Though the results are still puzzling.

Define mod(x,y) to be x-floor(x/y)*y, for x,y real and positive, but not necessarily integers. If you make a list of the first 10,000 primes, and plot f(x)=mod(p(x),Pi), then you get the graph with every 11th line missing. Where p(n) is the nth number on the list.

But instead of a list of all the primes, try it with a list of each number that is divisible by none of {2,3,5,7,11,13}. You also get a picture with every 11th line missing. Though the slope and spacing of the lines is different.

You also get every 11th line missing for {11,13}. Or even just for {11}. But you don't get any missing lines at all for {2,3,5,7,13} or for {7,13}, or for {13}. So missing lines happen when none of your numbers are divisible by 11. Apparently, only 11 has this effect. Not 7 or 13 or any of the other numbers. And it is every 11th line that is missing. Why 11?
not rated yet Sep 18, 2018
@ anonym. this is interesting. can u site me a link where this code in python 3 is available. am learning programming currently
not rated yet Sep 18, 2018
@savvys84, I don't know Python, but it looks like it has a function fmod that does the real-valued mod, and it has a math.pi that is the constant 3.1415926... So if you make a list "nums" that has all the numbers from 1 to 10000 for which (n % 11)>0, then you can plot fmod(nums[i],math.pi) versus i, and that will give you the plot with every 11th line missing.

But if instead, you make a list where each number n is such that (n % 7)>0, then creating a similar plot does NOT show every 7th line missing. Nor does it have every 11th line missing. It has no missing lines at all.

That is very surprising.

For comparison, in Mathematica that is:

ListPlot[Mod[#, Pi] & /@ Select[Table[i, {i, 1, 10000}], Mod[#, 11] > 0 &]]
ListPlot[Mod[#, Pi] & /@ Select[Table[i, {i, 1, 10000}], Mod[#, 7] > 0 &]]
not rated yet 22 hours ago
And if pi (3.14...) has a special relationship to 11, then e (2.71828...) has a special relationship to 3 and 29 and 53. And sqrt(2) has a different set of special numbers. Why is that?
not rated yet 15 hours ago
Thanks anonym. will chk it out

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.