Age bias exists even in outer space—in samples collected by Apollo astronauts

September 11, 2018 by Kayla Zacharias, Purdue University
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Because much of the evidence from Earth's early history has been destroyed by plate tectonics and weathering, astronomers often look to the moon and Mars for clues about our beginnings. But what if some of our information from those planets is biased?

When meteors crash into the , the impact creates so much heat that it melts the surface and spits up ejecta. Some of that melt product cools and eventually becomes shiny little orbs known as lunar glass spherules.

Ya-Huei Huang, a graduate student in earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences at Purdue University, looked to these spherules for clues about the rate of crashing into the moon.

The samples she studied were collected by Apollo astronauts in the 1960s. Most of the spherules were relatively young, which might indicate that the rate of impacts on the moon has increased in the recent past – but Huang was skeptical of this interpretation, based on deliberations with co-author Nicolle Zellner, a researcher at Albion College.

She created a model for the formation and distribution of lunar glass spherules and found that the impact rate on the moon has likely been constant, but that the small sample of spherules collected was biased toward younger impacts. The findings were published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters.

"The astronauts used a rake to collect samples from the surface of the moon, but if they were able to take samples from a few meters deeper, we might see a more accurate age distribution," said David Minton, a professor of earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences at Purdue who oversaw the research. "If we ever go back to the moon, we could collect samples differently and actually see if the rate of impacts has changed."

Understanding the impact rate is an important part of understanding the history of life on Earth, said Minton. As you may know, impacts have caused mass extinctions (including that of the dinosaurs). Because Earth has destroyed most of the evidence of its ancient history, the moon is an important piece of this puzzle.

Explore further: Image: Two lunar flashes light up darkened moon

More information: Ya-Huei Huang et al. No Change in the Recent Lunar Impact Flux Required Based on Modeling of Impact Glass Spherule Age Distributions, Geophysical Research Letters (2018). DOI: 10.1029/2018GL077254

Related Stories

Image: Two lunar flashes light up darkened moon

July 30, 2018

On 17 July 2018, an ancient lump from space thwacked into the moon with enough energy to produce a brilliant flash of light. With another space rock seemingly in pursuit, a second flash lit up a different region of the Moon ...

A dash of water on the lunar rocks

July 7, 2016

Ever since Apollo astronauts walked the lunar surface in 1969 and brought rocks back for laboratory analysis, it has been clear that lunar rocks are missing chemical components that boil off at relatively low temperature, ...

Recommended for you

Coffee-based colloids for direct solar absorption

March 22, 2019

Solar energy is one of the most promising resources to help reduce fossil fuel consumption and mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to power a sustainable future. Devices presently in use to convert solar energy into thermal ...

EPA adviser is promoting harmful ideas, scientists say

March 22, 2019

The Trump administration's reliance on industry-funded environmental specialists is again coming under fire, this time by researchers who say that Louis Anthony "Tony" Cox Jr., who leads a key Environmental Protection Agency ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4 / 5 (1) Sep 11, 2018
To the writers/editors of these articles--
I'm sorry but I don't find titles such as this one to be cute, clever, or enticing. In fact it leads me to suspect the article itself to be frivolous. Why not just tell us what the article is about? Like "Age bias found in samples collected by Apollo astronauts". Saves words too--like the brevity expected of commenters.
not rated yet Sep 11, 2018
ds, the answer to your questions is simple. "Eyeballs"!

The writers/editors/moderators who produce these clickbait headlines are not being paid by you or me or any other commentator.

The advertisers are the ones paying the site operators for dragging "eyeballs" onto the page where hopefuly, the viewers will click over to check out the ads. This is probably an reasonably accurate description of every online site that carries advertising.

"It's just business!"

The only choice I know of, for avoiding the headlines you find so annoying? Is for you to access only paid-subscription sites.


Since it worked? Their clever wording enticed gullible you and credulous me. What incentive would convince the site administrators to modify a working system?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.