Scientist begins developing instrument for finding extraterrestrial bacteria

Scientist begins developing instrument for finding extraterrestrial bacteria
NASA scientist Melissa Floyd holds her 3D-printed FISHbot prototype, which she is advancing to search for bacterial life on Mars and other solar system targets. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center/Bill Hrybyk

A NASA scientist wants to create a planetary robot that would mimic what biologists do every day in terrestrial laboratories: look through microscopes to visually identify microbial life living in samples.

Although very early in its technology development, the concept would take NASA's hunt for to the next level by actually looking for bacteria and archaea in soil and rock samples. So far, NASA's rovers have carried tools and instruments designed to look for biosignatures or signs of life that indicate habitability, not life itself, regardless of how primitive.

"Life exists everywhere on Earth, even in places that are incompatible to humans," said Melissa Floyd, a scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, who is using Goddard Internal Research and Development program funding to automate subsystems for a laboratory breadboard called FISHBot. "I had this idea, actually a major assumption on my part: what if life evolved on Mars the same way it did here on Earth? Certainly, Mars was bombarded with the same soup of chemistry as Earth."

It's not a huge assumption to make, she added. Nucleotides—the molecules that form deoxyribonucleic acid and ribonucleic acid—have been found in comets. Better known as DNA and RNA, these molecules store and transfer genetic information at a cellular level in all living organisms on Earth.

Search for Bacteria and Archaea

To find life on another planet, Floyd's robotic instrument would concentrate on identifying bacteria and archaea, members of a large group of single-cell microorganisms that thrive in diverse environments and are thought to be the first organisms to appear on Earth about 4 billion years ago. On Earth, one gram of soil typically contains about 40 million bacterial cells and a milliliter of fresh water usually holds 1 million cells.

Her concept, which she believes could deploy as a stand-alone robot or one of several instruments on a rover, relies on a widely used technique called fluorescent in situ hybridization—or FISH—developed to detect and locate the presence or absence of RNA or single-stranded DNA sequences on chromosomes. These threadlike structures are found in the nuclei of most living cells and carry in the form of genes. Since its development, FISH has been used for genetic counseling, medicine and species identification.

When performed in a laboratory, FISH involves, among other things, applying a sample to a slide, fixing the cells to increase cell-wall permeability, adding a nucleotide "probe"—a short sequence of typically 15 to 20 nucleotides along with a fluorescent tag for faster identification—and heating the sample. The slide is then placed under a microscope. When the nucleotide probe attaches to a similar nucleotide in the sample, it literally fluoresces or glows under a fluorescence microscope, helping researchers to identify the organism.

"I'm trying to determine whether I can do the same thing with a robot," Floyd said, adding that she would want the system to carry as many as 10 probes to identify a broad range of single-cell organisms. "If there are even fragments of highly conserved genetic sequences that we see in every corner of Earth, FISH will be the tool capable of detecting it."

The Automation Challenge

The challenge, she said, is simplifying and automating the process so that samples can be prepared on individual slides, heated, and automatically rotated for viewing under a microscope, which likely would have to be focused many times to see deep within the . With her funding, Floyd is developing the automated subsystems, including a focuser.

"The idea here is to replace with a robotic system what a scientist does in the lab," she said. "I could be completely wrong" about taking root on Mars or another solar system body in the same way that it did on Earth. "But how do we know? We've never looked."

Explore further

Is Mars' soil too dry to sustain life?

Citation: Scientist begins developing instrument for finding extraterrestrial bacteria (2018, August 9) retrieved 24 August 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Aug 09, 2018
Welcome news for anyone who ever wished NASA would send a microscope to Mars. Just another reason why I love NASA.

Aug 09, 2018
Yeah...I can't remember how many rovers/probes and every time I'm like: if youre looking for life, why don't you ever pack a friggin microscope?

That's so much more versatile than just looking for trace elements or byproducts...because these byproducts are specific to Earth organsims and not necessarily to any alien ones.

It doesn't even need to be complicated. Single use is fine. If there are archaea or bacteria then they'll be everywhere, so careful sample selection is unecessary.

Aug 09, 2018
AAP, obviously I am with you on this, as are a lot of folks over many years.

Another one is a (working) microphone. I could make some arguments about correlating sound with rover activities, maybe diagnosing rover problems, and the possibility of unexpected discoveries, etc., but Carl Sagan advocated for it and considering how small an ask it is, we shouldn't really question it so much IMHO.

Aug 14, 2018
Another one is a (working) microphone.

Microphones don't really work well in an atmosphere only about 1% as dense as Earth's

Aug 15, 2018
Microphones don't really work well in an atmosphere only about 1% as dense as Earth's

Obviously. NASA put the cameras at roughly human eye level on Opportunity and Spirit to give us a sense what it would be like to be there. Adding a (muffled) sound track seems like a good idea too. For scientific purposes, the obvious solution is to amplify the signals.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more