How emotions shape work life

June 18, 2018, University of Cambridge
How emotions shape work life
Credit: The District

Jochen Menges, an expert in organisational behaviour, thinks that emotions matter profoundly for employee performance and behaviour. His studies bring nuance to our understanding of how employees wish to feel at work.

It is important for people to feel happy rather than miserable in their – research shows that contented employees deliver better results after all.

But some businesses regard happiness initiatives as a 'salve' that can be applied across an organisation to increase wellbeing, as Dr. Jochen Menges from Cambridge Judge Business School explains.

"The very fact that many organisations now 'invest in happiness' means they understand that emotions matter. But what they typically do – offering benefits like chill-out zones, free food, yoga classes – is rather blunt and does not account for the complexity of people's emotional life."

Working with the Yale Center for Emotional Intelligence and the Faas Foundation, Menges is diving deeper into our understanding of emotions at work. The 'Emotion Revolution in the Workplace' project has asked over 10,000 employees from a mix of occupations, levels, ages, genders and ethnicities in the USA not just how they feel, but also how they wish to feel at work.

The results show that while some report feeling happy, many say they are stressed, tired and frustrated at work. When it comes to how people wish to feel, the study finds that most want to be appreciated, excited and happy. "There is a considerable gap between how people feel at work and how they would like to feel," Menges explains. "Now the challenge is to find ways to close that gap."

Although the analyses of this new dataset are still ongoing, Menges' previous work gives some hints. He suggests that happiness may not primarily be about perks. "The work itself, colleagues and supervisors, and the organisational structure and culture play major roles in whether or not employees are happy."

In one study, Menges found that people experience more in organisations that are in close touch with customers.

"These organisations tend to be more decentralised – decisions can be taken at lower levels – and they pay more attention to employees' emotional abilities in recruiting and promotion processes. Those two factors in turn are linked to how positive the employees across an organisation feel."

It's not all about being positive, however.

Although most research suggests that any pleasant emotion has beneficial effects on performance, creativity and commitment, Menges and his colleagues found in a recent study that some positive emotions – pride, for example – can be a problem.

"If employees do not identify with their organisation, then pride increases their intention to leave. They think 'I am better than this place,' and look for new opportunities." By contrast, if employees identified with their organisation and experienced events that made them feel angry, they were less likely to quit. "They want to stick it out and improve the situation."

So any emotions can be a good thing, Menges suggests, even if they are unpleasant. "If managers suppress employees' emotions, they over time create an environment of indifference. Employees just get on with work, but they are not as committed and invested anymore. A bit of emotion, a bit of up and down – that's what makes work meaningful."

Menges also challenges the idea that employees should pursue 'happiness'. "I think people differ in how they wish to feel at work. Although many of us simply say 'I want to be happy at work', what we actually mean by 'happy' can differ greatly."

Menges tries to understand how people differ in the feelings they look for at work, and whether those differences affect people's choice of employer and engagement at work.

For example, someone wanting to feel safe is likely to look for a stable, predictable job, whereas someone looking for excitement might not care much about job security as long as the job provides a stimulating environment.

The problem, according to Menges, is that most of us are not that specific when it comes to how we want to feel. "We lack the emotional vocabulary to pinpoint our desired emotions, so we just use 'happy'. If we had better search terms, perhaps the search for happiness would not be that fuzzy and difficult."

He suggests that organisations have a considerable influence on employees' emotions and that employees within an organisation tend to feel alike. "Emotions are a very intimate and personal experience, and yet how we feel often depends largely on how people around us feel.

"In some places, people are enthusiastic, excited and inspired for a better future; in others, they are satisfied, calm, relaxed, easy-going. Both are positive but have very different energy levels, and that is linked to different outcomes."

"In other places, there is aggression, stress and anxiety – or frustration, resignation and apathy. Again, both negative, but with different energy levels and outcomes."

Places with high positive energy are at risk of losing it. Menges saw this at first hand when he studied the impact of the economic crisis of 2008–2009. "Companies were working at a frenetic pace – they increased the number and speed of activities, raised performance goals, shortened innovation cycles. They were trying to get more done with fewer people at a faster pace."

But when performance went up, too often companies tried to make this pace the new normal. The result was that employees' energy began to drain.

These companies were in the 'Acceleration Trap' – a term he and a colleague coined in an article published in The Harvard Business Review. A sobering 60% of surveyed employees in companies that were in this trap said that they lacked sufficient resources to get their work done, compared with 2% in companies that were not trapped.

"Managers in accelerated companies realised that something was amiss, but they took the wrong cure. Rather than giving employees some relief, they increased pressure. Ironically, their calls for high performance led to lower performance," Menges says.

"The Acceleration Trap is still a common problem. Any uncertainty, such as Brexit, can generate the conditions where companies overload and under-resource employees, and where organisational fatigue and burnout can result."

The good news is that it is possible to escape the trap. Menges looked at how leaders recognised the trap and moved their company in different directions – such as halting less-important work, being clear about strategy and changing the culture.

"When it comes to how people feel in a business, many point to the leader. And it is right that leaders play a key role in setting the mood of a place," Menges explains. In particular, leaders with intelligence – the ability to recognise emotions in oneself and others, and to regulate emotions in ways that help reach rather than hinder goals – are in a good position to steer their team's and organisation's collective emotions in the right direction.

"But I think we need to also look at how the organisation as a system is set up," he says. Menges believes that some places are organised in a more emotionally effective way than others. "If companies figure out how they can institutionalise emotionally intelligent systems, they would be much better off than investing in 'happiness initiatives'."

Explore further: Many highly-engaged employees suffer from burnout

Related Stories

Many highly-engaged employees suffer from burnout

February 21, 2018

Underlining the danger of job burnout, a new study of more than 1,000 US workers finds that many employees who are highly engaged in their work are also exhausted and ready to leave their organisations.

The myth of quitting in anger

June 1, 2016

Anger often decreases – rather than boosts – a person's intention to quit a job when they identify strongly with their company, says a new study. 

Beware the 'awestruck effect'

December 23, 2015

Charismatic business leaders can cause their followers to suppress emotions, which can harm companies over the long term, according to new research. 

Recommended for you

How coral bleaching threatens Caribbean communities

February 21, 2019

Climate change has fueled coral reef bleaching throughout the tropics, with negative consequences for reef ecosystems and the people who depend on them. A new study finds that in the Caribbean, independent island nations ...

'Flying bulldog': world's largest bee refound

February 21, 2019

The world's largest bee—a giant insect roughly the size of a human thumb—has been rediscovered in a remote part of Indonesia in its first sighting in nearly 40 years, researchers said Thursday.

Israeli spacecraft aims to make history by landing on Moon

February 21, 2019

A rocket will take off from Cape Canaveral in Florida on Thursday night carrying Israel's Beresheet spacecraft, which aims to make history twice: as the first private-sector landing on the Moon, and the first from the Jewish ...

Sculpting stable structures in pure liquids

February 21, 2019

Oscillating flow and light pulses can be used to create reconfigurable architecture in liquid crystals. Materials scientists can carefully engineer concerted microfluidic flows and localized optothermal fields to achieve ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Jun 18, 2018
And yet someone just published a 'research' paper saying that USA companies should not promote meditation because it reduces motivation....

Sure, if someone is selling weapons, meditation might affect his motivation to 'work'.... And since selling weapons and doing other immoral acts is typical of the USA economy, she thinks that they should not practice meditation to keep 'motivated' (to harm society).

My observation has been that humans like to suffer, and therefore many would prefer a shooting at their work place, than daily meditation, exercise and yoga.
1 / 5 (1) Jun 18, 2018
It is important for people to feel happy rather than miserable in their work

No. Really? Do tell.

And yet someone just published a 'research' paper saying that USA companies should not promote meditation because it reduces motivation....

Which is pretty much in line with what they say in the article:
But what they typically do – offering benefits like chill-out zones, free food, yoga classes – is rather blunt and does not account for the complexity of people's emotional life."

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.