Coal mining reduces abundance, richness of aquatic life

April 18, 2018, University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Coal mining, under current US regulations, has significantly reduced the abundance and variety of fish, invertebrates, salamanders, and other aquatic life in streams, according to a new study from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

That damage to stream biodiversity could extend to humans and impact everything from public health outcomes to recreational fishing and hunting, according to the study, which was published today in the journal Nature Sustainability.

"Our article will be interesting to policymakers as well as the broad public as trade-offs between fossil fuel development and environmental conservation are currently being actively debated in the political arena," said Xingli Giam, assistant professor in UT's Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and the study's lead author.

Giam co-authored the study with Daniel Simberloff, Gore Hunger Professor of Environmental Science in UT's Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Julian D. Olden of the University of Washington.

Scientists have long agreed that coal mining negatively affects water quality. But this study is the first to provide a quantitative analysis of its impact on different aquatic species affected by different mining methods.

Coal mining in the US is currently governed primarily by two federal statutes—the 1972 Clean Water Act, which regulates discharge of dredged or fill material and other pollutants, and the 1977 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act, which established operational standards to minimize the impacts of both surface and underground mines. In both types of mining, harmful solutes can leak into streams.

The researchers examined data and literature on the richness and abundance of species in streams affected by coal mining and unaffected streams. They found that streams affected by coal mining were, on average, 32 percent lower in taxonomic richness and 53 percent lower in total abundance than unmined streams. Even after mining companies' efforts to reclaim mined lands and return them to health, streams affected by mining still had lower richness and abundance of species than unmined streams.

"Our investigation demonstrates that current US regulations are insufficient to fully protect stream biodiversity," the study states.

Because coal mining is expected to continue until at least the year 2040 and will likely expand to previously unmined lands as current mines are depleted, the researchers have identified several watersheds—mainly in the central and southern Appalachians and on the Colorado Plateau—that will suffer the greatest and most irreversible biodiversity declines and whose aquatic species will be most affected. These watersheds deserve the greatest regulatory scrutiny, the authors say. They include the Elk in West Virginia, the Upper Clinch and Powell in Tennessee and Virginia, the Upper Cumberland in Tennessee and Kentucky, the Locust and Upper Black Warrior in Alabama, and the Upper Mississippi-Cape Girardeau in Illinois and Missouri.

In December 2016, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement issued the Stream Protection Rule, which revised regulations implemented under the 1977 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. The goal was to reduce coal mining's impact on water quality and biodiversity by requiring companies to collect pre-mining, mining, and post-mining/reclamation data on and biodiversity at regular intervals. This requirement would help ensure that they do the necessary remediation work.

In January 2017, Congress enacted a joint resolution to repeal the rule, claiming the requirement was too costly to businesses.

The authors note that mining's impact goes beyond and can affect the health of communities. It is linked to increased human mortality from lung cancer, chronic health problems, and kidney disease. It also can affect recreational opportunities, including fishing and game hunting, by killing off fish and animals and making the surviving fish too dangerous to eat.

The study makes several recommendations, including reinstating the Stream Protection Rule, tightening current regulations to reduce the impact of on stream biodiversity, implementing stringent monitoring requirements, prohibiting the dumping of waste to preserve habitats and minimize downstream pollution, and rejecting permit requests once a certain percentage of a watershed has been mined.

Explore further: One in five streams damaged by mine pollution in southern West Virginia: study

More information: Xingli Giam et al. Impact of coal mining on stream biodiversity in the US and its regulatory implications, Nature Sustainability (2018). DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0048-6

Related Stories

The impact of mining Alaska's coal

March 11, 2014

Alaska, the last great frontier, is being threatened by many proposals to mine an estimated 5.5 trillion tons of coal. Sam Weis, author of "The Local and Worldwide Impact of Mining Alaska's Coal" in the magazine Environment: ...

Recommended for you

Evidence of earliest life on Earth disputed

October 17, 2018

When Australian scientists presented evidence in 2016 of life on Earth 3.7 billon years ago—pushing the record back 220 million years—it was a big deal, influencing even the search for life on Mars.

Arctic greening thaws permafrost, boosts runoff

October 17, 2018

A new collaborative study has investigated Arctic shrub-snow interactions to obtain a better understanding of the far north's tundra and vast permafrost system. Incorporating extensive in situ observations, Los Alamos National ...

Arctic ice sets speed limit for major ocean current

October 17, 2018

The Beaufort Gyre is an enormous, 600-mile-wide pool of swirling cold, fresh water in the Arctic Ocean, just north of Alaska and Canada. In the winter, this current is covered by a thick cap of ice. Each summer, as the ice ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rrwillsj
3.7 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2018
I feel sorry for the people living in these deteriorating environments. Unwilling to adapt and learn new skills. Trapped with false-hopes from duplicitous politicians. That the coal-miners past lives will be protected on a reservation frozen in time.

gkam
1 / 5 (4) Apr 18, 2018
Hey, it's Capitalism.

It made 'Murica great!
rrwillsj
1 / 5 (2) Apr 19, 2018
I suspect 'grate' is more accurate than 'great'.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.