Can strongly lensed type Ia supernovae resolve one of cosmology's biggest controversies?

March 1, 2018 by Linda Vu, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
This composite of two astrophysics simulations shows a Type Ia supernova (purple disc) expanding over different microlensing magnification patterns (colored fields). Because individual stars in the lensing galaxy can significantly change the brightness of a lensed event, regions of the supernova can experience varying amounts of brightening and dimming, which scientists believed would be a problem for cosmologists measuring time delays. Using detailed computer simulations at NERSC, astrophysicists showed that this would have a small effect on time-delay cosmology. Credit: Danny Goldstein/UC Berkeley

In 1929 Edwin Hubble surprised many people – including Albert Einstein – when he showed that the universe is expanding. Another bombshell came in 1998 when two teams of astronomers proved that cosmic expansion is actually speeding up due to a mysterious property of space called dark energy. This discovery provided the first evidence of what is now the reigning model of the universe: "Lambda-CDM," which says that the cosmos is approximately 70 percent dark energy, 25 percent dark matter and 5 percent "normal" matter (everything we've ever observed).

Until 2016, Lambda-CDM agreed beautifully with decades of cosmological data. Then a research team used the Hubble Space Telescope to make an extremely precise measurement of the local cosmic expansion rate. The result was another surprise: the researchers found that the universe was expanding a little faster than Lambda-CDM and the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), relic radiation from the Big Bang, predicted. So it seems something's amiss – could this discrepancy be a systematic error, or possibly new physics?

Astrophysicists at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) and the Institute of Cosmology and Gravitation at the University of Portsmouth in the UK believe that strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae are the key to answering this question. And in a new Astrophysical Journal paper, they describe how to control "microlensing," a physical effect that many scientists believed would be a major source of uncertainty facing these new cosmic probes. They also show how to identify and study these rare events in real time.

"Ever since the CMB result came out and confirmed the accelerating universe and the existence of dark matter, cosmologists have been trying to make better and better measurements of the cosmological parameters, shrink the error bars," says Peter Nugent, an astrophysicist in Berkeley Lab's Computational Cosmology Center (C3) and co-author on the paper. "The error bars are now so small that we should be able to say 'this and this agree,' so the results presented in 2016 introduced a big tension in cosmology. Our paper presents a path forward for determining whether the current disagreement is real or whether it's a mistake."

Better Distance Markers Shed Brighter Light on Cosmic History

The farther away an object is in space, the longer its light takes to reach Earth. So the farther out we look, the further back in time we see. For decades, Type Ia supernovae have been exceptional distance markers because they are extraordinarily bright and similar in brightness no matter where they sit in the cosmos. By looking at these objects, scientists discovered that dark energy is propelling cosmic expansion.

But last year an international team of researchers found an even more reliable distance marker – the first-ever strongly lensed Type Ia supernova. These events occur when the gravitational field of a massive object – like a galaxy – bends and refocuses passing light from a Type Ia event behind it. This "gravitational lensing" causes the supernova's light to appear brighter and sometimes in multiple locations, if the light rays travel different paths around the massive object.

Because different routes around the massive object are longer than others, light from different images of the same Type Ia event will arrive at different times. By tracking time-delay between the strongly lensed images, astrophysicists believe they can get a very precise measurement of the rate.

"Strongly lensed supernovae are much rarer than conventional supernovae – they're one in 50,000. Although this measurement was first proposed in the 1960's, it has never been made because only two strongly lensed supernovae have been discovered to date, neither of which were amenable to time delay measurements," says Danny Goldstein, a UC Berkeley graduate student and lead author on the new Astrophysical Journal paper.

After running a number of computationally intensive simulations of supernova light at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility located at Berkeley Lab, Goldstein and Nugent suspect that they'll be able to find about 1,000 of these strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae in data collected by the upcoming Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) – about 20 times more than previous expectations. These results are the basis of their new paper in the Astrophysical Journal.

"With three lensed quasars – cosmic beacons emanating from massive black holes in the centers of galaxies – collaborators and I measured the expansion rate to 3.8 percent precision. We got a value higher than the CMB measurement, but we need more systems to be really sure that something is amiss with the standard model of cosmology, " says Thomas Collett, an astrophysicist at the University of Portsmouth and a co-author on the new Astrophysical Journal paper. "It can take years to get a time delay measurement with quasars, but this work shows we can do it for supernovae in months. One thousand lensed supernovae will let us really nail down the cosmology."

In addition to identifying these events, the NERSC simulations also helped them prove that strongly lensed Type Ia supernovae can be very accurate cosmological probes.

"When cosmologists try to measure time delays, the problem they often encounter is that individual stars in the lensing galaxy can distort the light curves of the different images of the event, making it harder to match them up," says Goldstein. "This effect, known as 'microlensing,' makes it harder to measure accurate time delays, which are essential for cosmology."

But after running their simulations, Goldstein and Nugent found microlensing did not change the colors of strongly lensed Type Ia supernova in their early phases. So researchers can subtract the unwanted effects of microlensing by working with colors instead of light curves. Once these undesirable effects are subtracted, scientists will be able to easily match the light curves and make accurate cosmological measurements.

They came to this conclusion by modeling the supernovae using the SEDONA code, which was developed with funding from two DOE Scientific Discovery through Advanced Computing (SciDAC) Institutes to calculate light curves, spectra and polarization of aspherical supernova models.

"In the early 2000s DOE funded two SciDAC projects to study supernova explosions, we basically took the output of those models and passed them through a lensing system to prove that the effects are achromatic," says Nugent.

"The simulations give us a dazzling picture of the inner workings of a supernova, with a level of detail that we could never know otherwise," says Daniel Kasen, an astrophysicist in Berkeley Lab's Nuclear Science Division, and a co-author on the paper. "Advances in high performance computing are finally allowing us to understand the explosive death of stars, and this study shows that such models are needed to figure out new ways to measure ."

Taking Supernova Hunting to the Extreme

When LSST begins full survey operations in 2023, it will be able to scan the entire sky in only three nights from its perch on the Cerro Pachón ridge in north-central Chile. Over its 10-year mission, LSST is expected to deliver over 200 petabytes of data. As part of the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, Nugent and Goldstein hope that they can run some of this data through a novel supernova-detection pipeline, based at NERSC.

For more than a decade, Nugent's Real-Time Transient Detection pipeline running at NERSC has been using machine learning algorithms to scour observations collected by the Palomar Transient Factor (PTF) and then the Intermediate Palomar Transient Factory (iPTF) – searching every night for "transient" objects that change in brightness or position by comparing the new observations with all of the data collected from previous nights. Within minutes after an interesting event is discovered, machines at NERSC then trigger telescopes around the globe to collect follow-up observations. In fact, it was this pipeline that revealed the first-ever strongly lensed Type Ia supernova earlier this year.

"What we hope to do for the LSST is similar to what we did for Palomar, but times 100," says Nugent. "There's going to be a flood of information every night from LSST. We want to take that data and ask what do we know about this part of the sky, what's happened there before and is this something we're interested in for cosmology?"

He adds that once researchers identify the first light of a strongly lensed supernova event, computational modeling could also be used to precisely predict when the next of the light will appear. Astronomers can use this information to trigger ground- and space-based telescopes to follow up and catch this light, essentially allowing them to observe a supernova seconds after it goes off.

"I came to Berkeley Lab 21 years ago to work on supernova radiative-transfer modeling and now for the first time we've used these theoretical models to prove that we can do cosmology better," says Nugent. "It's exciting to see DOE reap the benefits of investments in computational cosmology that they started making decades ago."

Explore further: Rare supernova discovery ushers in new era for cosmology

More information: Daniel A. Goldstein et al, Precise Time Delays from Strongly Gravitationally Lensed Type Ia Supernovae with Chromatically Microlensed Images, The Astrophysical Journal (2018). DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa975

Related Stories

Rare supernova discovery ushers in new era for cosmology

April 20, 2017

With the help of an automated supernova-hunting pipeline and a galaxy sitting 2 bil-lion light years away from Earth that's acting as a "magnifying glass,'' astronomers have captured multiple images of a Type Ia supernova—the ...

New Type Ia supernova discovered using gravitational lensing

July 24, 2017

(—Using gravitational lensing, an international team of astronomers has detected a new Type Ia supernova. The newly discovered lensed supernova was found behind the galaxy cluster known as MOO J1014+0038. The findings ...

Hubble astronomers check the prescription of a cosmic lens

May 1, 2014

( —Two teams of astronomers using the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope have discovered three distant exploding stars that have been magnified by the immense gravity of foreground galaxy clusters, which act like ...

New supernova analysis reframes dark energy debate

September 13, 2017

The accelerating expansion of the Universe may not be real, but could just be an apparent effect, according to new research published in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. The new study—by a ...

Recommended for you

Fish-inspired material changes color using nanocolumns

March 20, 2019

Inspired by the flashing colors of the neon tetra fish, researchers have developed a technique for changing the color of a material by manipulating the orientation of nanostructured columns in the material.

Researchers shed new light on the origins of modern humans

March 20, 2019

Researchers from the University of Huddersfield, with colleagues from the University of Cambridge and the University of Minho in Braga, have been using a genetic approach to tackle one of the most intractable questions of ...

One transistor for all purposes

March 20, 2019

In mobiles, fridges, planes – transistors are everywhere. But they often operate only within a restricted current range. LMU physicists have now developed an organic transistor that functions perfectly under both low and ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (4) Mar 01, 2018
Perhaps many of these discrepancies are from the gravitational pull of other Hubble sphere universes packed in cuboctahedron structure..
1.4 / 5 (9) Mar 01, 2018
The edifice of the expanding Universe has been falsified by the great astronomer Halton Arp when he showed beyond a shadow of the doubt redshift is an intrinsic property of the matter involved. As such, this is a complete waste of resources.
1 / 5 (2) Mar 01, 2018
When you look at the early estimates of the Hubble constant and their associated errors the current values lie well outside the error bars. This is because the error bars reflect the measurement error with respect to a particular model which may be overly simplistic or miss key features. In truth the errors in the cosmic expansion rate are probably much bigger than quoted and this discrepancy may not be significant.
5 / 5 (3) Mar 01, 2018
The error bars in estimations of the current cosmic expansion rate are well known. On what basis do you claim the opposite?
3 / 5 (2) Mar 01, 2018
Hubble himself did not believe that Redshift indicated expansion and thought that there must be some other explanation but used the 'radial velocity' argument in his 1929 paper. In his later published works he argued ever more stridently against it, partially because redshift data interpretation in his day indicated the universe could only be a few billion years old, younger than the estimated age of the sun.

Also of note is that around half of the galaxies imaged by Hubble are in the local group, our local galaxy cluster that includes the Milky Way. Although he measured redshift with distance, neither the local group nor our local supercluster, the Laniakea Supercluster, are expanding. Hence nearly all the Galaxies that Hubble measured were in structures that are not expanding...
3.3 / 5 (7) Mar 01, 2018
The edifice of the expanding Universe has been falsified by the great astronomer Halton Arp when he showed beyond a shadow of the doubt redshift is an intrinsic property of the matter involved. As such, this is a complete waste of resources.

No he didn't. He just made an ass of himself. Expansion has been measured. End of story.
2 / 5 (4) Mar 02, 2018
No he didn't. He just made an ass of himself. Expansion has been measured. End of story.

Well jonesdumb waved his hands about and exclaimed "nu huh". Must be another case of "settled science"...Not!
2.6 / 5 (5) Mar 02, 2018
Well jonesdumb waved his hands about and exclaimed "nu huh". Must be another case of "settled science"...Not!

Well, I've only looked at the first link so far. However, in a paper cited over 500 times, this is said:

Repeating the analysis of Richards et al. (2006) for the DR5 sample reveals no structure in the redshift distribution after selection effects have been included (see lower histogram in
Figure 3); ***this is in contrast to the reported redshift structure found in the SDSS quasar survey by Bell & McDiarmid (2006)***.

The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Catalog IV. Fifth Data Release
Svhneider, D. P. et al.

So, that's the first one dealt with.
1 / 5 (3) Mar 02, 2018
I agree it is a waste but why in the face of all common sense does science fund this instead of other?

2 / 5 (4) Mar 02, 2018
I agree it is a waste but why in the face of all common sense does science fund this instead of other?

Instead of other what?
3 / 5 (6) Mar 02, 2018
As for the third of cd's links, that is in a seriously crank journal, the Journal of Cosmology:


That's as bad, if not worse, than the place that Don Scott publishes his dreadful "science."

The second link is Bell again, and nobody (other than fellow redshift cranks) has cited it, barring a couple of mainstream papers who merely reference Bell as per the distribution of certain types of galaxy, but not his DIR stuff.
So, not particularly impressed by that stuff.
1.8 / 5 (5) Mar 02, 2018
It wouldn't be a morning if we didn't hear a jonesdumb ad hominem attack, it's what he does... Oh, and link to confirmation bias and circular reasoning.
2.6 / 5 (5) Mar 02, 2018
It wouldn't be a morning if we didn't hear a jonesdumb ad hominem attack, it's what he does... Oh, and link to confirmation bias and circular reasoning.

What confirmation bias? They were wrong, as shown. As has been shown previously with other of these claims. There is just a small cabal who were rambling on about this stuff, and it is getting ever smaller.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.