Risks of manipulating the global thermostat

December 12, 2017 by Allie Nicodemo, Northeastern University
Credit: Allie Nicodemo

If someone offered you a magic pill that claimed to cure all health ailments, would you take it? Let's say you did. Perhaps you'd start eating pizza and ice cream for every meal, since proper nutrition would no longer be a concern. Maybe that exercise regimen would fall by the wayside as well. You could forgo all prescribed medications. The risk, of course, is that the pill would fail, or come with unintended consequences.

The concept of climate engineering—large-scale efforts to manipulate the "global thermostat"—is like a for . Rather than transitioning society and the economy from reliance on fossil fuels to renewable energy, or focusing on social change to reduce , some seek to solve climate change with a sweeping technological fix by using climate engineering.

There are several problems with this approach, explained Northeastern's Jennie Stephens, Dean's Professor of Sustainability Science and Policy and associate director for strategic research collaborations at the Global Resilience Institute. Stephens recently co-wrote a paper on the topic with Peter Frumhoff, chief climate scientist and director of science and policy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.

The proposed climate engineering project that has received the most attention involves injecting aerosols—or small particles—into the atmosphere to mimic the effects of a large volcano erupting. Some scientists are eager to begin experiments to try it. But as Stephens points out, there are multiple risks in doing this research. "Advancing research builds momentum toward deployment, and there is no international governance system to manage this," she said.

Rain, rain, go away

There's a reason the weather is our trusty universal conversation-starter—it impacts everyone. But only a small number of scientists are exploring ways to control it.

Risks of manipulating the global thermostat
If climate engineering technology is advanced, it could also be weaponized. “One powerful person, entity, or country could decide to do this on its own, almost unilaterally, and that would have an impact on the whole world,” said Jennie Stephens. Credit: Adam Glanzman/Northeastern University
"There is a potential for a huge power differential with regard to who's making decisions for who," Stephens said. And it's "almost inevitable" that optimizing the climate in one region of the world will have unforeseen consequences in another. For example, "It's easy to imagine that the United States might want to seek outcomes that maintain favorable precipitation patterns for Midwest farmers," Stephens said, "but in doing so, it might actually exacerbate conditions in the Sahel." This could widen the global inequality gap even further.

If competition to control the climate snowballs into a full-fledged geopolitical power struggle, the results could be messy, Stephens said. And if climate engineering technology is advanced, it could also be weaponized.

"One powerful person, entity, or country could decide to do this on its own, almost unilaterally, and that would have an impact on the whole world," Stephens said.

Research risks

As the risks of climate change increase, interest in climate engineering is growing. Last month, the U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology held a joint subcommittee to discuss the future of research, technology, and innovation in geoengineering. At the meeting, some politicians expressed their interest and support for exploring climate engineering options.

"Scientists need to engage in broader international conversations about both the risks of change and the risks of ," Stephens said.

Explore further: Public—and researchers—skeptical to climate engineering

Related Stories

Public—and researchers—skeptical to climate engineering

November 15, 2017

What does the general public know about climate engineering, and what do they think about what they know? These were questions asked by researchers from Linköping University, together with researchers from Japan, the US ...

EU body: Climate change poses increasingly severe risks

January 25, 2017

The European Environment Agency says the continent is facing rising sea levels and more extreme weather, such as more frequent and more intense heat waves, flooding, droughts and storms because of climate change.

Recommended for you

Galactic center visualization delivers star power

March 21, 2019

Want to take a trip to the center of the Milky Way? Check out a new immersive, ultra-high-definition visualization. This 360-movie offers an unparalleled opportunity to look around the center of the galaxy, from the vantage ...

Physicists reveal why matter dominates universe

March 21, 2019

Physicists in the College of Arts and Sciences at Syracuse University have confirmed that matter and antimatter decay differently for elementary particles containing charmed quarks.


Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.