Methane from tundra, ocean floor didn't spike during previous natural warming period

August 23, 2017
Credit: CC0 Public Domain

Scientists concerned that global warming may release huge stores of methane from reservoirs beneath Arctic tundra and deposits of marine hydrates - a theory known as the "clathrate gun" hypothesis - have turned to geologic history to search for evidence of significant methane release during past warming events.

A new study published this week in the journal Nature suggests, however, that the last ice age transition to a warmer climate some 11,500 years ago did not include massive flux from marine sediments or the tundra. Instead, the likely source of rising levels of atmospheric methane was from tropical wetlands, authors of the new study say.

While this certainly is good news, the study also points at a larger role of humans in the recent methane rise, noted Edward Brook, an Oregon State University paleoclimatologist and co-author on the study

"Our findings show that natural geologic emissions of methane - for example, leakage from oil seeps or gas deposits in the ground - are much smaller than previously thought," Brook said. "That means that a greater percentage of the methane in the atmosphere today is due to human activities, including oil drilling, and the extraction and transport of natural gas."

The study suggests that human emissions of geologic methane may be as much as 25 percent higher than previous estimates. Although not as abundant as carbon dioxide, methane is a much more powerful greenhouse gas and therefore the rising levels are an important contributor to global warming.

"This means we have even more potential to fight global warming by curbing from our fossil fuel use," said Vasilii Petrenko, an associate professor of earth and environmental sciences at the University of Rochester, and lead author on the study.

Anthropogenic methane emissions are the second largest contributor to after carbon dioxide, but there has been uncertainty as to the source of that methane and whether it has changed over time, Brook noted. The new study sheds light on the issue by analyzing levels of atmospheric methane from the last deglaciation in air bubbles that have been trapped in pristine ice cores from Antarctica's Taylor Glacier.

The researchers were able to estimate the magnitude of methane emissions from roughly 11,500 years ago by measuring radioactive carbon isotopes in methane, (carbon-14, also known as 14C or radiocarbon), which decay fairly rapidly. Methane released from those marine hydrates and permafrost is old enough that any 14C originally present has now decayed away.

They found that amount of methane from ancient "14C-free sources" was very low - less than 10 percent of the total methane - during the entire range of sampling, from 11,800 to 11,300 years ago.

"A lot of people have painted the Arctic as a methane time bomb," Brook said, "but this shows that it may be more stable than we thought. Past performance isn't always a predictor of the future, but it is a good analog. We should be more concerned about anthropogenic sources of methane into the atmosphere, which continue to increase."

The levels of 14C in the ice cores suggest that the increase in methane during the last deglaciation had another source - likely from tropical wetlands, said Christo Buizert, an Oregon State University researcher and co-author on the paper.

"Methane is not stored in the tropics for long periods of time, but produced every day by microbial activity in wetlands," Buizert said. "We know from other studies that rainfall increased in the tropics during the last warming period, and that likely created wetlands that produced the increase in methane during the last warming period."

Atmospheric methane has increased from 750 parts per billion in the year 1750 to more than 1,800 parts per billion today - mostly from anthropogenic sources, especially leakage from fossil fuel production, the creation of rice paddies, and cattle ranching, the researchers say.

"All of the natural gas that we mine is very old and leaking inevitably occurs during that process," Brook said. "Natural gas is considered a cleaner energy source than coal, but it can be a significant problem depending on how much of the methane is leaking out."

The key to documenting the source of is the pristine ice cores of Taylor Glacier in Antarctica, where dry, windy conditions have allowed this ancient ice to be slowly brought to the surface. One reason scientists had yet to pin down the sources of methane during the last ice age is that the amount of 14C is so small, it takes enormous amounts of ice to get enough air to measure the isotope.

In fact, it takes some 2,000 pounds of ice, running a melting instrument over three days, to get enough air to produce one sample of measurable 14C. Drilling down in the center of the ice sheet to find that much ice from the end of the last ice age would be prohibitively costly and labor-intensive, but the unique conditions at Taylor Glacier - pushing that old ice toward the surface - made it possible.

Explore further: Methane-eating microbes may reduce release of gases as Antarctic ice sheets melt

More information: Vasilii V. Petrenko et al. Minimal geological methane emissions during the Younger Dryas–Preboreal abrupt warming event, Nature (2017). DOI: 10.1038/nature23316

Related Stories

Wetlands the primary source of Amazon Basin methane

August 31, 2012

The Amazon basin is an important sink of carbon dioxide, but it is also a substantial source of atmospheric methane. Tropical wetlands, including those in the Amazon, are one of the largest sources of biogenic methane and ...

Recommended for you

New research could predict La Nina drought years in advance

November 16, 2017

Two new studies from The University of Texas at Austin have significantly improved scientists' ability to predict the strength and duration of droughts caused by La Niña - a recurrent cooling pattern in the tropical Pacific ...

7 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nik_2213
5 / 5 (4) Aug 23, 2017
I hope they're correct about the clathrates, as there's a lot of it lurking.
Da Schneib
4.8 / 5 (4) Aug 23, 2017
Well, that's at least some good news. Assuming they're correct, of course, which remains to be seen.
Shootist
1.7 / 5 (6) Aug 23, 2017
all warming is natural.
Caliban
5 / 5 (6) Aug 23, 2017
As written, the article clearly fails to support the conclusion of the research.

Throughout the time period which may or may not have been studied --hard to say which, since this article is so horribly written-- and right up until just before the beginning of the Industrial Era, global temperatures have warmed sufficient to melt the ice sheets while remaining cool enough that permafrost has not thawed.

However, it is thawing now, and certainly this is releasing methane and contributing further to AGW.

It still remains to be seen if AGW will trigger the clathrate gun, but one thing that we can clearly see is that this study has exactly ZERO predictive power, since the past conditions studied aren't even vaguely similar to those at present, much less future.

I've seen some poorly written articles here in the past, but this one deserves a medal for such utter shoddiness.

We can only hope that the actual research wasn't of the same quality.
richk
5 / 5 (1) Aug 23, 2017
yea.I/don't/get/it/either.this/is/the/warmest/it/has/been/since/the/last/age/so/how/do/they/draw/their
good/news/conclusion?
rrrander
1.8 / 5 (5) Aug 23, 2017
Natural warming? I thought the "People's Directorate on Propaganda" banned mention of it?
Caliban
5 / 5 (3) Aug 24, 2017
Natural warming? I thought the "People's Directorate on Propaganda" banned mention of it?


It appears that you thought wrong.

No worries, though -one thing we can be certain of is that you'll do it again, probably in a matter of minutes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.