Why mosquitoes should not be eliminated

July 11, 2017 by Grace Winn
Anopheles gambiae mosquito, feeding on blood. Credit: James Gathany, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

A Purdue researcher and a team of scientists working on a new insecticide argue that mosquitoes should not simply be made extinct due to their role in various ecosystems.

Catherine Hill, a professor of entomology, and her team are developing an that will suppress ' ability to transmit diseases without killing the insect or interfering with other life forms. The team is based in Discovery Park, a research park dedicated to using interdisciplinary teams to solve global problems. Hill's research was one of the winners of Discovery Park's Big Idea Challenge, a program that provides resources to interdisciplinary teams with innovative research.

"For the last 20 years I've been trying to figure out how to kill mosquitoes, and then I had this epiphany where, morally, I'm just not OK with it anymore," she said.

There has been a lack of research in preserving mosquitoes because researchers have looked mostly at ways to eradicate them. Therefore, Hill thinks it is essential to consider all the possible effects of wiping out an organism that has existed for thousands of years. She points out that mosquitoes have co-evolved with many species, so there are likely other organisms that depend on them as a food source.

Along with her non-lethal pesticide research, Hill also participates in research to create insecticides that overpower a crucial chemical for locomotion behavior, development learning and memory known as dopamine. This eventually results in the death of the insect. Although this method is often effective in killing mosquitoes, Hill decided to produce an insecticide that would affect the biology of the mosquito so that it would be unable to transmit to another host, thus sparing the insect's life.

During her years of research, Hill says she began to find mosquitoes to be amazing and beautiful organisms, and began to better understand that their removal could have an effect on the environment. She points out that mosquitoes are "a large part of the biomass in many ecosystems."

While mosquitoes are in their aquatic stage, they serve as a for fish and predatory insects. During this stage, mosquitoes also serve as filter feeders, which results in organic matter being turned over, making them excellent converters in an ecosystem.

In their terrestrial stage, mosquitoes serve as food for birds, bats, salamanders, lizards, frogs and other animals. According to Hill, there are particularly massive numbers of mosquitoes in Alaska and near the Arctic Circle, and it could potentially be dangerous to take away mosquitoes from that food chain.

"To yank [mosquitoes] out abruptly, I don't know what that does," Hill says.

According to Hill, there are several thousand species of mosquitoes worldwide, with only a small percentage of those species carrying diseases. Researchers know very little about the species that do not transmit disease, so this leaves a lot of unanswered questions concerning what would happen if mosquitoes were wiped out.

"You pull one little piece and start to unravel it, and things happen," says Hill.

An interesting fact about mosquitoes that Hill discovered is that "they sing to each other." The wings of mosquitoes beat at varying frequencies, and it is thought that use the frequency of the male's wings to choose a mate. Once the male and female locate one another, their frequencies harmonize.

Although Hill wants to find an insecticide that can spare the life of the insect, she says that research is still being done to improve the effectiveness of insect-lethal insecticides. Due to the increasing threat of vector-borne diseases, a conventional pesticide would need to be administered if the for a non-lethal pesticide proves unsuccessful.

Explore further: Researchers revolutionizing control of vector-borne diseases

Related Stories

New insecticide created for mosquitoes

July 18, 2007

French scientists have developed an effective insecticide-repellent compound that can be used against mosquitoes resistant to current chemicals.

Recommended for you

New hermit crab uses live coral as its home

September 20, 2017

A new hermit crab species can live in a walking coral's cavity in a reciprocal relationship, replacing the usual marine worm partner, according to a study published September 20, 2017 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by ...

Barn owls found to suffer no hearing loss as they age

September 20, 2017

(Phys.org)—A small team of researchers with the University of Oldenburg has found that barn owls do not suffer hearing loss as they get older. In their paper published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, the group describes ...

The right way to repair DNA

September 20, 2017

Is it better to do a task quickly and make mistakes, or to do it slowly but perfectly? When it comes to deciding how to fix breaks in DNA, cells face the same choice between two major repair pathways. The decision matters, ...

Bats anticipate optimal weather conditions

September 20, 2017

Millions of animals fly, swim or walk around the Earth every year. To ensure that they reach their destination, they need to perceive precise changes in environmental conditions and choose the right moment to set off on their ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rderkis
1 / 5 (1) Jul 11, 2017
"For the last 20 years I've been trying to figure out how to kill mosquitoes, and then I had this epiphany where, morally, I'm just not OK with it anymore," she said.


What's the matter with this woman? It's morally wrong to kill a species of mosquito that kills millions of children, men and women every year plus our livestock and pets? Where is the morality, in letting the mosquitoes kill that many children, if we could stop/eliminate them?

If we use gene drive therapy to kill all the wild tiger mosquitoes, we would not need to make them extinct. We could save some in reserve incase some unforeseen consequences occur. Then we could re release them if and when she ever manages to control their ability to spread disease.
sunjinjo
not rated yet Jul 15, 2017
It's not the mosquito's fault it transmits disease. We should indeed be looking at how to stop the disease from being transmitted, or to eradicate the disease altogether. Granted, the insect will still be annoying, but I'm willing to put up with that in order to feed fish, birds, bats and other insects beyond counting.
rderkis
not rated yet Jul 15, 2017
It's not the mosquito's fault it transmits disease.


What does fault have to do with it? It spreads diseases that kill millions of people every year.
You notice I did not advocate extinction only elimination of wild ones till they come up with a way of eliminating the mosquitoes ability to carry diseases. (As you advocate)
BTW The studies show that by using gene drive we could eliminate all the wild tiger mosquitoes in 2 years thus in essence eliminating those diseases. If we release our reserve of tiger mosquitoes into the wild, they would be back in 2 years.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.