New material may help cut battery costs for electric cars, cellphones

July 6, 2017
Researchers at the University of Texas at Dallas and Seoul National University have designed a novel battery cathode material that offers a potentially lower-cost, more eco-friendly option to lithium-ion batteries. Their sodium-ion design, which retains the high energy density of a lithium-ion cathode, replaces the most of the lithium atoms (green) with sodium (yellow). The layered structure of the new material also incorporates manganese (purple) and oxygen (red). The research is published in the journal Advanced Materials. Credit: University of Texas at Dallas

In the battle of the batteries, lithium-ion technology is the reigning champion, powering that cellphone in your pocket as well as an increasing number of electric vehicles on the road.

But a novel manganese and sodium-ion-based material developed at The University of Texas at Dallas, in collaboration with Seoul National University, might become a contender, offering a potentially lower-cost, more ecofriendly option to fuel next-generation devices and electric cars.

Battery cost is a substantial issue, said Dr. Kyeongjae Cho, professor of science and engineering in the Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and Computer Science and senior author of a paper describing the new material in the journal Advanced Materials.

As manufacturers—and consumers—push for more (EVs), lithium production may have a hard time keeping up with increasing demand, Cho said. According to a recent report by the International Energy Agency, the global electric car stock surpassed 2 million vehicles in 2016 after crossing the 1 million mark in 2015. The report notes that, depending on the policy environment, there is a good chance that it will range between 9 million and 20 million by 2020 and between 40 million and 70 million by 2025.

In terms of cost savings in the EV , using sodium would be less expensive because sodium is more abundant, but it has some drawbacks.

"Lithium is a more expensive, limited resource that must be mined from just a few areas on the globe," Cho said. "There are no mining issues with sodium—it can be extracted from seawater. Unfortunately, although sodium-ion batteries might be less expensive than those using lithium, sodium tends to provide 20 percent lower energy density than lithium."

The energy density, or energy storage capacity, of a battery determines the run time of a device.

"We used our previous experience and thought about these issues—how can we combine these ideas to come up with something new to solve the problem?" Cho said.

A battery consists of a positive electrode, or anode; a negative electrode, or cathode; and an electrolyte in between. In a standard lithium-ion battery, the cathode is made of lithium, cobalt, nickel and oxygen, while the anode is made of graphite, a type of carbon. When the battery charges, lithium ions move through the electrolyte to the anode and attach to the carbon. During discharge, the lithium ions move back to the cathode and provide electric energy to run devices.

"There was great hope several years ago in using manganese oxide in battery cathodes to increase capacity, but unfortunately, that combination becomes unstable," Cho said.

In the design developed by Cho and his colleagues, sodium replaces most of the lithium in the cathode, and manganese is used instead of the more expensive and rarer elements cobalt and nickel.

"Our sodium-ion material is more stable, but it still maintains the high energy capacity of ," Cho said. "And we believe this is scalable, which is the whole point of our research. We want to make the material in such a way that the process is compatible with commercial mass production."

Based on their knowledge of the physics and chemistry of other experimental materials, the researchers attacked the problem with rational material design. They first ran computer simulations to determine the configuration of atoms that showed the most promise before making and testing the material in the lab.

Cho said his research is not just about coming up with a better battery. How the research was done is just as important and as interesting, he said.

"When Thomas Edison was trying to develop a light bulb, he tried thousands of different materials for the filament to see which ones worked," Cho said. "To solve very important engineering problems in society today, we need to develop lots of new materials—battery materials, pollution control materials and others. Edison was perfecting one item—the light bulb—but we have so many more technological needs. We don't have time to keep trying to accidentally find the solution."

Explore further: Scientists identify chemical causes of battery 'capacity fade'

More information: Duho Kim et al, Rational Design of Na(Li1/3 Mn2/3 )O2 Operated by Anionic Redox Reactions for Advanced Sodium-Ion Batteries, Advanced Materials (2017). DOI: 10.1002/adma.201701788

Related Stories

Could a seawater battery help end our dependence on lithium?

December 7, 2016

With the ubiquity of lithium-ion batteries in smartphones and other rechargeable devices, it's hard to imagine replacing them. But the rising price of lithium has spurred a search for alternatives. One up-and-coming battery ...

Making sodium-ion batteries that last

February 15, 2017

Lithium-ion batteries have become essential in everyday technology. But these power sources can explode under certain circumstances and are not ideal for grid-scale energy storage. Sodium-ion batteries are potentially a safer ...

Recommended for you

The birth of a new protein

October 20, 2017

A yeast protein that evolved from scratch can fold into a three-dimensional shape—contrary to the general understanding of young proteins—according to new research led by the University of Arizona.

Discovery lights path for Alzheimer's research

October 19, 2017

A probe invented at Rice University that lights up when it binds to a misfolded amyloid beta peptide—the kind suspected of causing Alzheimer's disease—has identified a specific binding site on the protein that could facilitate ...

9 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2017
Very good. Can we do better, i.e. receive any frequency, any amplitude, even high power, maintain molecular structure, while transferring the energy into storage. Another layer as activation of charge flow under current and directional control? I know, hard to figure for fast moving charges, but think about cue ball hitting the pack. Get it? Remember this is juz physics. Each wavelet either is transmitted or absorbed in direction substance and intensity. The transformance is always a function of the motion of charge centers. No prob, just a nonlinear equation, how about "unknown atomic structures for results", search? Only possible solutions, criteria, juz say'n Experimentation and Identification ...
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2017
Your technique is too slow; however, effective. Definitive?
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2017
The particle motion, particle as a set of charge pairs, this maintains molecular control, any other would be selective for the charge, i.e. your current control. Note: the charge pairs are a wiggle. From there it's mostly thermal, i.e. more pairs, get it!
Hyperfuzzy
Jul 06, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (4) Jul 06, 2017
Remember this is juz physics.

What they did is physics.

What you are burbling are...insane ramblings. Why do you even bother?
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2) Jul 06, 2017
Waiting for @Eikka to come tell all us idiots why it won't work.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (2) Jul 06, 2017
Juz, say'n Why can't we simulate all possibilities? Capital, ManPower, ROI, Expense, schedule? You know, logic, finance, physics, compsci! I know, far above your head! Economic advantage! That is, what we do is in synch with what is needed, even if it means designing $hit to design $hit, if its possible, WTF? There is no box! Insane rambling indeed. If you are not listening, don't answer. Who actually reads "ramblings"?

The accomplishment is grand! Look at the process to the accomplishment! Simplify! Else you did not learn squat!

Who responds to "ramblings"?
Hyperfuzzy
Jul 06, 2017
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (2) Jul 06, 2017
Oh forgot, you're a CEO of a phone company, not a modern tech leader! anti- are you a negative bot?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.