Europe battles Google News over 'snippet tax' proposal

EU plans to make Google pay for the news it displays are making the internet giant furious
EU plans to make Google pay for the news it displays are making the internet giant furious

A major battle is brewing in Brussels over an EU reform plan that would force internet aggregators such as Google News to pay newspapers for displaying snippets of their articles online.

Google is furious at the reform idea, but powerful publishers, including Axel Springer in Germany or Rupert Murdoch's Newscorp in the UK, affirm that a tax is the only hope to save a industry starving for revenue.

The fight, which will play out for the rest of the year, is the latest row straining ties between Google and the European Union, which slapped the Silicon Valley giant with a 2.4 billion euro ($2.8 billion) fine over unfair competition in June.

The proliferation of free news on the internet has brought the newspaper industry to its knees, with many consumers unwilling to pay for online service, preferring zero-cost platforms such as Google News or Facebook.

"Unauthorised internet use of media content" by aggregators and search engines "is threatening citizens' sustainable access to quality news content," said the European Alliance of News Agencies, of which AFP is a member.

"It is therefore crucial that neighbouring rights be created for news agencies and other publishers, covering all activity" on the web, the agency said.

Neighbouring rights is EU-speak for the obligation for online platforms such as Google or Facebook to pay for showing short quotes from copyrighted content, such as news articles.

The so-called "snippet tax" proposal is only one of several components of a major EU draft law intended to update European copyright law in the digital age.

The "snippet tax" is largely based on a tax introduced in Spain that critics say actually harmed publishers when Google decided to close down its news aggregator in response.

A similar law in Germany saw publishers swiftly give Google open access to their content following a steep drop in online traffic.

Biggest corporate fines by the EU
Biggest corporate fines by the EU

'Very sensitive topic'

Based on these examples, the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA), whose members include Google and Yahoo, called the idea "ill-founded, controversial and detrimental to all players."

In a blog post published last year, Google said: "It would hurt anyone who writes, reads or shares the news—including the many European startups working with the news sector to build sustainable business models online."

The two camps on the issue are now battling it out at the European Parliament and the EU council, the institution that gathers the national governments of the 28 member states.

Diplomats said the snippet tax has divided member states, with no compromise in sight for this year. Approval will require a special EU majority that must account for 65 percent of the bloc's population and not solely a majority of member states.

For now, France, Spain and Germany have declared their support for the tax while Ireland, UK and the Nordic countries are against.

In the European Parliament, three committees have approved a version of the tax proposal, but the key Legal Affairs Committee has still to decide, with lobbyists working hard to influence its decision.

French MEP Marc Joulaud said the committee is expected to approve the law on October 10 with an eventual vote on the overall copyright reforms at a plenary session in December or January.

Then the hard work begins. EU member states, MEPs and the commission must negotiate a compromise of their separate texts.

"This is a very sensitive topic in parliament but also for journalists, some for, some against," said Andrus Ansip, Commission vice-president in charge of the Digital Single Market.

"I didnt promote this idea, but publishers are very keen for neighbouring rights," he added.

Explore further

US newspaper group assails Google-Facebook online 'duopoly'

© 2017 AFP

Citation: Europe battles Google News over 'snippet tax' proposal (2017, July 30) retrieved 22 October 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jul 31, 2017
That makes sense. You have to pay to use even small portions of copy right music. Why should these multi billion dollar companies not have to pay the owners of materiel if they are going to make money from posting some one else work. I say Its about fucking time.

Jul 31, 2017
If the web crawler aggregator is exceeding the terms of a news sites "robots.txt" then charge them:
Otherwise a snippet is free advertising/trailing and leads to click-through eyeball traffic and more advertising revenue for the news sources.

Jul 31, 2017
shit, the newspapers ought to pay Google. Damn but the hard left is sooo fricking stupid

Jul 31, 2017
It would be a simple matter for Google, Yahoo and other aggregators to simply not list anything from newspapers in areas demanding a tax for such listing. The newspapers' online usage would plummet without the aggregators' links back to their online news.

The consequences for those newspapers could be severe. But the left never looks to the consequences of their taxes.

Jul 31, 2017
Actually seems like the perfect opportunity for Google and Facebook to phase out Murdoch's MSM.
If google starts to pay an insignificantly small fee to content creators (news writers) for their content we could actually see a whole new era of news (YouNews).
Considering the fact that the MSM is at least 90% just hearsay and just copying what they find from independent individuals on twitter, the movement to purely independent journalists wouldn't cause a significant dip in quality either.
Admittedly too much power would go to the duopoly, but at the same time we already have a cartel with almost equal power.

Jul 31, 2017
Google should just shut down the snippets from those countries that support the tax for now. Just to show them what will happen. When it hits their internet traffic (and thereby ad revenue) you can bet the case will be dropped in a jiffy.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more