Could space travelers melt as they accelerate through deep space?

April 18, 2017 by Matt Williams, Universe Today
Could space travelers melt as they accelerate through deep space?
Artist Mark Rademaker's concept for the IXS Enterprise, a theoretical interstellar spacecraft. Credit: Mark Rademaker/

Forty years ago, Canadian physicist Bill Unruh made a surprising prediction regarding quantum field theory. Known as the Unruh effect, his theory predicted that an accelerating observer would be bathed in blackbody radiation, whereas an inertial observer would be exposed to none. What better way to mark the 40th anniversary of this theory than to consider how it could affect human beings attempting relativistic space travel?

Such was the intent behind a new study by a team of researchers from Sao Paulo, Brazil. In essence, they consider how the Unruh effect could be confirmed using a simple experiment that relies on existing technology. Not only would this experiment prove once and for all if the Unruh effect is real, it could also help us plan for the day when interstellar travel becomes a reality.

To put it in layman's terms, Einstein's Theory of Relativity states that time and space are dependent upon the inertial reference frame of the observer. Consistent with this is the theory that if an observer is traveling at a constant speed through empty vacuum, they will find that the temperature of said vacuum is absolute zero. But if they were to begin to accelerate, the temperature of the empty space would become hotter.

This is what William Unruh – a theorist from the University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver – asserted in 1976. According to his theory, an observer accelerating through space would be subject to a "thermal bath" – i.e. photons and other particles – which would intensify the more they accelerated. Unfortunately, no one has ever been able to measure this effect, since no spacecraft exists that can achieve the kind of speeds necessary.

Could space travelers melt as they accelerate through deep space?
According to the theory of the Unruh effect, accelerating particles are subject to increased radiation. Credit: NASA/Sonoma State University/Aurore Simonnet

For the sake of their study – which was recently published in the journal Physical Review Letters under the title "Virtual observation of the Unruh effect" – the research team proposed a simple experiment to test for the Unruh effect. Led by Gabriel Cozzella of the Institute of Theoretical Physics (IFT) at Sao Paulo State University, they claim that this experiment would settle the issue by measuring an already-understood electromagnetic phenomenon.

Essentially, they argue that it would be possible to detect the Unruh effect by measuring what is known as Larmor radiation. This refers to the electromagnetic energy that is radiated away from charged particles (such as electrons, protons or ions) when they accelerate. As they state in their study:

"A more promising strategy consists of seeking for fingerprints of the Unruh effect in the radiation emitted by accelerated charges. Accelerated charges should back react due to radiation emission, quivering accordingly. Such a quivering would be naturally interpreted by Rindler observers as a consequence of the charge interaction with the photons of the Unruh thermal bath."

As they describe in their paper, this would consist of monitoring the light emitted by electrons within two separate reference frames. In the first, known as the "accelerating frame", electrons are fired laterally across a magnetic field, which would cause the electrons to move in a circular pattern. In the second, the "laboratory frame", a vertical field is applied to accelerate the electrons upwards, causing them to follow a corkscrew-like path.

Diagram of the experiment to test the Unruh effect, where electrons are injected into a magnetic field and subjected to lateral and vertical pulls. Credit: Cozzella, Gabriel (et al.)

In the accelerating frame, Cozzella and his colleagues assume that the electrons would encounter the "fog of photons", where they both radiate and emit them. In the laboratory frame, the would heat up once vertical acceleration was applied, causing them to show an excess of long-wavelength photons. However, this would be dependent on the "fog" existing in the accelerated frame to begin with.

In short, this experiment offers a simple test which could determine whether or not the Unruh effect exists, which is something that has been in dispute ever since it was proposed. One of the beauties of the proposed experiment is that it could be conducted using particle accelerators and electromagnets that are currently available.

On the other side of the debate are those who claim that the Unruh effect is due to a mathematical error made by Unruh and his colleagues. For those individuals, this experiment is useful because it would effectively debunk this theory. Regardless, Cozzella and his team are confident their proposed experiment will yield positive results.

"We have proposed a simple experiment where the presence of the Unruh thermal bath is codified in the Larmor radiation emitted from an accelerated charge," they state. "Then, we carried out a straightforward classical-electrodynamics calculation (checked by a one) to confirm it by ourselves. Unless one challenges classical electrodynamics, our results must be virtually considered as an observation of the Unruh effect."

If the experiments should prove successful, and the Unruh effect is proven to exist, it would certainly have consequences for any future deep-space missions that rely on advanced propulsion systems. Between Project Starshot, and any proposed mission that would involve sending a crew to another star system, the added effects of a "fog of photons" and a "thermal bath" will need to be factored in.

Explore further: Chinese scientists realize quantum simulation of the Unruh effect

More information: Virtual observation of the Unruh effect.

Related Stories

Perfectly accurate clocks turn out to be impossible

October 7, 2015

Can the passage of time be measured precisely, always and everywhere? The answer will upset many watchmakers. A team of physicists from the universities of Warsaw and Nottingham have just shown that when we are dealing with ...

Does the universe have a rest frame?

March 21, 2017

Physics is sometimes closer to philosophy when it comes to understanding the universe. Donald Chang from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China, attempts to elucidate whether the universe has a resting frame. ...

Recommended for you

Study details the history of Saturn's small inner moons

May 22, 2018

The small inner moons of Saturn look like giant ravioli and spaetzle. Their spectacular shape has been revealed by the Cassini spacecraft. For the first time, researchers of the University of Bern show how these moons were ...

Two bright high-redshift quasars discovered

May 21, 2018

Astronomers have detected two new bright quasars at a redshift of about 5.0. The newly found quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) are among the brightest high-redshift quasars known to date. The finding was presented May 9 in a paper ...

First interstellar immigrant discovered in the solar system

May 21, 2018

A new study has discovered the first known permanent immigrant to our Solar System. The asteroid, currently nestling in Jupiter's orbit, is the first known asteroid to have been captured from another star system. The work ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2017
If I was thinking like a philo I would begin to wonder just what the effect on the universe would be of accelerating a being with consciousness to relativistic speeds? Would this being leave a path of collapsed spacetime in its wake? Would this only happen if it looked out a porthole? Slit-shaped perhaps?

Would this make it go even faster? Could relativistic consciousness be a viable method of interstellar travel or simply an unfortunate method of destroying all that is?

Wonder whatever happened to noumenon? 'God is dead - so is kant'
not rated yet Apr 18, 2017
I was thinking more like running through the rain.....
The faster you go, the more droplets you will collide with.

Please speak for yourself, only to yourself please on religion.
4 / 5 (4) Apr 18, 2017
No the slower you go the more time for droplets to hit you. I think you need to resolve it mathematically.
5 / 5 (1) Apr 18, 2017
If the density of raindrops (particles) is the same across the same distance, you'll get hit with the same amount of raindrops regardless of speed. That said, the raindrop impacts will be a lot more energetic at higher speed.
2 / 5 (4) Apr 18, 2017
The "observer" in the quantum mechanical model of reality is not necessarily a conscious observer. It is anything that interacts enough with the quantum system, which causes a transfer of information, which is a measurement. A cold gluon can be the "observer", without consciousness.
not rated yet Jun 04, 2017
If the density of raindrops (particles) is the same across the same distance, you'll get hit with the same amount of raindrops regardless of speed. That said, the raindrop impacts will be a lot more energetic at higher speed.

Actually, the faster you go, the greater the distance covered, which means more raindrops to collide with. if drops are uniform in the medium.
1 / 5 (1) Jun 04, 2017

The way this actually works is that the farther you go across the ground, the more drops you'll hit horizontally (your face and front). But it doesn't matter how fast you go, you'll hit the same drops that are in your way. However, the longer you take the more drops will hit you on the top of your head.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.