Does the universe have a rest frame?

March 21, 2017
Credit: Springer

Physics is sometimes closer to philosophy when it comes to understanding the universe. Donald Chang from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China, attempts to elucidate whether the universe has a resting frame. The results have recently been published in EPJ Plus.

To answer this tricky question, he has developed an experiment to precisely evaluate particle mass. This is designed to test the special theory of relativity that assumes the absence of a rest frame, otherwise it would be possible to determine which inertial frame is stationary and which frame is moving. This assumption, however, appears to diverge from the standard model of cosmology, which assumes that what we see as a vacuum is not an empty space. The assumption is that the energy of our universe comes from the quantum fluctuation in the vacuum.

In a famous experiment conducted by Michelson and Morley in the late 19th century, the propagation of light was proved to be independent of the movement of the laboratory system. Einstein, his Special Theory of Relativity, inferred that the physical laws governing the propagation of light are equivalent in all inertial frames—this was later extended to all physics laws not just optics.

In this study, the author set out to precisely measure the masses of two charged moving in opposite directions. The conventional thinking assumes that the inertial frame applies equally to both particles. If that's the case, no detectable mass difference between these two particles is likely to arise. However, if the contrary is true, and there is a rest frame in the , the author expects to see difference that is dependent on the orientation of the laboratory frame.

This proposed experiment partially inspired by the Michelson and Morley experiments can be conducted using existing experimental techniques. For simplicity, an electron can be used as the charged particle in the experiment.

Explore further: Special relativity from first principles

More information: Donald C. Chang, Is there a resting frame in the universe? A proposed experimental test based on a precise measurement of particle mass, The European Physical Journal Plus (2017). DOI: 10.1140/epjp/i2017-11402-4

Related Stories

Special relativity from first principles

December 19, 2011

Einstein’s explanation of special relativity, delivered in his 1905 paper On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies focuses on demolishing the idea of ‘absolute rest’, exemplified by the theoretical luminiferous ...

Quantum computer as detector shows space is not squeezed

January 28, 2015

Ever since Einstein proposed his special theory of relativity in 1905, physics and cosmology have been based on the assumption that space looks the same in all directions - that it's not squeezed in one direction relative ...

Doubly special relativity

March 21, 2011

General relativity, Einstein’s theory of gravity, gives us a useful basis for mathematically modeling the large scale universe – while quantum theory gives us a useful basis for modeling sub-atomic particle physics ...

Recommended for you

The structural mystery of scandium fluoride illustrated

August 10, 2017

Whoever said rules were made to be broken wasn't a physicist. When something doesn't act the way you think it should, either the rules are wrong, or there's new physics to be discovered. Which is exactly what UConn's Connor ...

6 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

JIMBO
3 / 5 (2) Mar 21, 2017
This paper has never been vetted on the arxiv, & the author's total of 3 publications are speculative at best. I would not hold my breath waiting.
Da Schneib
5 / 5 (1) Mar 21, 2017
Noted that local and global rest frames are not discussed.

This looks like negative information: that which, when you understand it, reduces your understanding.
PhysicsMatter
5 / 5 (1) Mar 21, 2017
What he is advocating is an experiment overthrowing Special Relativity that asserts that there are no preferred frames of reference and what we call "now" is relative depending of a frame of reference of the observer.

Speed of light is constant but time/space is a subject to dilatation.

However, there are widely ignored alternatives; one below asserts a preferred frame of reference and variable speed of light.

Implications of an Absolute Simultaneity
Theory for Cosmology and Universe
Acceleration
Edward T. Kipreos*
University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States of America
Published at PLOS;

What is interesting that this obscure theory based on Absolute Lorentz Transformation (ALT), can explain recently discovered rapid acceleration of the universe expansion without necessity of introducing abstract, unproven so far concepts of dark matter and dark energy.

PhysicsMatter
not rated yet Mar 21, 2017
I did not read the original paper but the guy must measure momentum not energy of particles to get their mass since energy is invariant in all frames of references regardless whether or not they are equivalent or preferred or resting frame.

Otherwise, the guy wants to also question the conservation of energy principle as well.

Here is some critique of relativity theory from philosophical point of view:
https://questforn...ativity/
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Mar 25, 2017
Sounds like a voodoo mass. I know, I know, take it down; but, allow this! Rest Frame? Do you mean frame of reference, that's something we define!
Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet Mar 25, 2017
Who looks for one? Relative to what? An infinite universe with an infinite set of diametrical spherical fields, apparently never created and never destroyed. We call it charge!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.