In a quantum race everyone is both a winner and a loser

March 24, 2017, University of Vienna
Applying the superposition principle to a photon's motion can lead it in two different directions at the same time. If a different order of operations is applied in each path, this can be used to create a genuinely indefinite order of operations. Credit: Jonas Schmöle, Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna

Our understanding of the world is mostly built on basic perceptions, such as that events follow each other in a well-defined order. Such definite orders are required in the macroscopic world, for which the laws of classical physics apply. The current work by a team of physicists from the University of Vienna is the first experimental quantification of such a superposition. It will be published in an upcoming issue of Science Advances.

When describing nature using physical laws, scientists often start from everyday experiences. However, our usual intuition does not apply to the . Physicists have recently realized that quantum theory even forces us to question innate concepts, such as the order in which things occur. Imagine, for example, a race between two friends, Alice and Bob. In everyday life, the winner is the first to cross the finish line. Thus, common sense says that either Alice wins, Bob wins, or they tie. This reasoning, however, is not always applicable in the quantum world. In fact, allows each runner to win and lose in one race: Alice could reach the finish line both before and after Bob in quantum . However, even if we held such a quantum race, how could we verify that both racers won in superposition? Part of the problem is that quantum mechanics says when we observe the race it "collapses". This means that we only see either Alice win or lose the race: we can't see the superposition.

Witnessing scrambled orders of operations

A group of physicists led by Philip Walther at the University of Vienna have implemented a new measurement, called a "causal witness", which allows them to watch Alice win and lose at the same time. This exciting measurement technique was designed by Caslav Brukner's theory group at the Austrian Academy of Sciences. Formally, a causal witness is a mathematical tool to determine whether it is possible to describe an experiment without having to resort to superimposed orders. Using this new tool, the physicists could do more than simply see Alice win and lose in superposition: they were able to quantify the degree to which the two situations actually were superimposed.

Rather than holding a microscopic quantum race, the scientists superimposed the order in which two quantum operations acted on particles of light. In their experiment, the physicists placed photons - particles of light - in a superposition of two different paths. Each path was then routed in different orders through two different quantum operations. Although in the past the team had created such a superposition of orders of quantum operations, they could previously only verify the superposition indirectly.

To implement the causal witness, the physicists needed to devise a scheme which allowed them to extract information from inside of a highly-fragile quantum process without destroying it. To do so, they used another quantum system to essentially raise a flag when the photon passed by one of the quantum operations. Although this could have still collapsed the system, the found a new trick to measure the additional quantum system while keeping the superposition intact. Their new technique allowed them to only extract information about the overall superposition, and not about the order of operations. From those measurement results they confirmed that the photons really had passed through both quantum operations in two orders at the same time.

Future implications

The fact that the order of quantum operations can be put in opens up a new playground for studies in quantum mechanics. On the theoretical side, this is already indicated by a large number of studies and proposals about the role of "causal relations" within quantum mechanics. However, translating these proposals into laboratory experiments is challenging. "Our experimental demonstration is a meaningful step forward in this area, since it demonstrates how to extract information inside these processes without disturbing their quantum nature", says Giulia Rubino, lead author of the study.

The group's next goal is to exploit new technological advances to create superpositions of more complex processes. This will allow them to gain deeper insights into the interplay between causal relations and quantum mechanics. Furthermore, it presents an interesting new route to optimize tasks even beyond what is possible using standard computers with a fixed order of operations.

Explore further: Quantum causal relations: A causes B causes A

More information: Experimental Verification of an Indefinite Causal Order, Giulia Rubino, Lee A. Rozema, Adrien Feix, Mateus Araújo, Jonas M. Zeuner, Lorenzo M. Procopio, Caslav Brukner, and Philip Walther, Science Advances (2017) DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1602589

Related Stories

Quantum causal relations: A causes B causes A

October 2, 2012

A deeply rooted concept in everyday life is causality; the idea that events in the present are caused by events in the past and, in turn, act as causes for what happens in the future. Physicists from the University of Vienna ...

Paving the way for a faster quantum computer

August 11, 2015

A team of physicists from the University of Vienna and the Austrian Academy of Sciences have demonstrated a new quantum computation scheme in which operations occur without a well-defined order. The researchers led by Philip ...

Quantum process demonstrates superposition of ordered events

November 4, 2015

(Phys.org)—In a quantum superposition, a quantum object can be in two incompatible states at the same time, which is famously illustrated by Schrödinger's dead-and-alive cat. Recent research has shown that it's possible ...

Physicists quantify the usefulness of 'quantum weirdness'

April 13, 2016

(Phys.org)—For the past 100 years, physicists have been studying the weird features of quantum physics, and now they're trying to put these features to good use. One prominent example is that quantum superposition (also ...

Quantum Mechanical Con Game

May 5, 2008

For the first time, physicists have come up with a scheme that would allow a quantum mechanical expert to win every time in a con game with a victim who only knows about classical physics. Prior quantum cons have typically ...

Tracking the flow of quantum information

November 17, 2016

If objects in motion are like rainwater flowing through a gutter and landing in a puddle, then quantum objects in motion are like rainwater that might end up in a bunch of puddles, all at once. Figuring out where quantum ...

Recommended for you

Muons spin tales of undiscovered particles

April 20, 2018

Scientists at U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national laboratories are collaborating to test a magnetic property of the muon. Their experiment could point to the existence of physics beyond our current understanding, including ...

Integrating optical components into existing chip designs

April 19, 2018

Two and a half years ago, a team of researchers led by groups at MIT, the University of California at Berkeley, and Boston University announced a milestone: the fabrication of a working microprocessor, built using only existing ...

3 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Eikka
5 / 5 (3) Mar 24, 2017
Actually, by observing such a quantum race you don't collapse the superposition, you become part of it. The confusion stems from the idea that there exists classical observers in a quantum world, where in reality there are only quantum observers.

Whether you observe Alice or Bob to win the race doesn't even matter until some other thing comes along that demands a resolution - and when that happens it's as if history had re-written itself and you knew all along which one it was: the collapse of the superposition is an illusion of quantum physics as well.

In that sense, it's as if the whole universe was created a second ago. All the possibilities come together into a now and arrange themselves in a causally consistent way that looks like a classical reality because all that anyone knows about it is that it's causally consistent. What happens the next moment could in principle be entirely different, but we wouldn't be any wiser about it because again it would seem consistent.
JongDan
not rated yet Mar 24, 2017
But, what happens with this thought experiment if you try to explain it in terms of pilot wave interpretation, which is demonstrably equivalent to the more usual duality interpretation?
winthrom
not rated yet Mar 26, 2017
@Eikka makes a compelling case for a mechanism that would explain momentary creation of "many worlds" that do not know of each other and collapse into our classical world reality when "... some other thing comes along that demands a resolution - and when that happens it's as if history had re-written itself and you knew all along which one it was: the collapse of the superposition is an illusion of quantum physics as well."

One wonders if any quantum mechanism will cause "win/lose/draw" worlds to continue in parallel.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.