Why the EU's tax probe of Apple and others is raising US ire

August 30, 2016 by The Associated Press
In this Wednesday, Dec. 7, 2011 file photo, a person stands near the Apple logo at the company's store in Grand Central Terminal, in New York. The European Union's executive branch rejected Thursday, Aug. 25, 2016 the U.S. government's complaint that its probes into sweetheart tax deals between EU governments and big companies are hitting U.S. firms hardest. The European Commission, which polices EU laws, is cracking down on the practice in which EU governments offer low corporate tax rates to multinationals. The Commission has opened tax probes into Apple in Ireland, Starbucks in the Netherlands and Amazon in Luxemburg. (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan, File)

The European Union's crackdown on corporate tax avoidance has landed on Apple ; its antitrust regulator is demanding that the U.S. tech giant pay Ireland up to 13 billion euros ($14.5 billion) plus interest in back taxes.

The ruling is the highest profile move yet in the European battle to make international companies pay what authorities consider their fair share of EU taxes. The EU charges that Apple and other big companies struck deals with EU countries to pay unusually low tax in exchange for basing their European operations there.

The U.S. government has countered that European officials are unfairly targeting American companies.

The EU's investigations of Apple and other multinationals trace their origins to a 2014 leak of documents that showed how big companies shop around among EU states to get as low a rate as possible. The revelation that has fueled popular anger in Europe, where cash-strapped governments had been raising taxes on households.

Here are some questions and answers about the issue.



European countries are keen to attract big companies to their territory; sometimes too keen, with some offering ultra-low as incentives. So the EU launched a drive to combat by investigating the deals that allow multinationals to slash their bills in countries like Luxembourg, Ireland and the Netherlands. The EU says some 50-70 billion euros ($56-79 billion) are lost every year due to tax avoidance. Also, some multinationals shift their earnings made in EU countries to the one low-tax country they are based in. That helps them lower their overall tax bill. In January, the EU Commission, which polices EU rules, unveiled new plans to tackle the problem. They include closing tax loopholes and improving the way tax information is shared across the 28-nation EU.



They do. The European Commission says it's not interfering with members' rights to set their corporate tax rates, but that it should help protect countries from unfair tax competition. When one country's tax policy hurts a neighbor's revenues, that country should be able to protect its tax base. The EU rules also try to ensure that a country can effectively tax profits generated in its territory. A big problem is that EU countries share little information about their corporate tax rulings. This makes it difficult for tax authorities to work out where a company's real business takes place and apply the rules fairly. The Commission says many multinationals take advantage by shifting their profits from one country to another. This deprives EU governments of tax revenues.



The U.S. Treasury Department released a report last week claiming that American companies were being unfairly targeted in the probe and that doing so could end up costing American taxpayers. That's because businesses get U.S. tax credits for their foreign tax payments. Apple and other U.S. firms leave much of their foreign earnings overseas to avoid higher U.S. tax rates. Treasury officials say they're working to get companies to repatriate those funds.



The highest-profile multinationals to be investigated by the EU—Apple, Amazon and Starbucks—are American. But the EU Commission says there is no bias against U.S. companies. It notes that Italian automaker Fiat was targeted last year, and that 35 mostly European firms were impacted this year by its ruling against a Belgian tax scheme. The Commission says all companies that generate and record profits in an EU country should pay taxes in line with national tax laws, no matter whether they're based in Europe or abroad.



Easily, given that the company's cash hoard exceeds $200 billion. At the end of June , Apple reported holding $231.5 billion in cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities. The company held $214.9 billion of that amount in foreign subsidiaries.

Overall, Apple paid an effective tax rate of 25.5 percent on pretax income of $10.5 billion in its April-June quarter, for a total payment of $2.7 billion. That left Apple with net income of $7.8 billion in the quarter.

Explore further: Why the EU's tax probe of multinationals is raising US ire

Related Stories

Apple says will appeal EU tax ruling

August 30, 2016

Apple vowed Tuesday to appeal an EU ruling ordering it to pay a record 13 billion euros in back taxes in Ireland, saying the decision would harm jobs and investment in Europe.

EU orders Apple to pay up to 13B euros in back taxes

August 30, 2016

Apple has to pay up to 13 billion euros ($14.5 billion)—plus billions more in interest—in back taxes to Ireland after the European Union found Tuesday that the U.S. technology giant contributed almost no tax across the ...

Recommended for you


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 30, 2016
Treasury officials say they're working to get companies to repatriate those funds.

Then they should be happy that Apple has to drop tax deals that allow it to pay less than a single percent in tax, because deals like Ireland's is the reason why Apple shuffles its money abroad.
not rated yet Aug 30, 2016
If Apple did not violate any Irish laws what claim does the EU have on Apple? Their only recourse should be to try to force Ireland to change its tax laws. Then Ireland could well be the next country to exit from the EU.
not rated yet Sep 02, 2016
If Apple did not violate any Irish laws what claim does the EU have on Apple?

Ireland effectively gave Apple a private subsidy, against EU rules that state you can't give out arbitrary subsidies that apply to only one company. That rule was put in place to stop countries from waging trade war against each other by subsidizing their own businesses without offering the same incentives to all businesses operating in the country.

EU has to force Ireland to take the subsidy back, because again if they didn't then all the countries would continue breaking the rule and simply go "oops, my bad" when caught doing it, and then do it again. It would be a crime without punishment.

Then Ireland could well be the next country to exit from the EU.

The rule is part of the single market area (EEC), which the UK is joining after breaking up with the union to keep trade relations with the EU, so they won't actually get rid of it.
not rated yet Sep 02, 2016
What people don't understand in their criticism that the EU is just pointless bureaucracy, is the fact that the EU is supposed to be the bureaucratic go-between for all the member countries. It's supposed to collectively perform all the paperwork that would otherwise be performed individually between all the member states.

Before the EU, the 28 countries were writing up standards and regulations and agreements one-on-one between everyone. Every country would negotiate an agreement with 27 other countries, which would be 756 times the bureaucracy if actually done that way. With the EEC as a single market bloc, the bureaucracy - as inefficient as it is in such a large system - only needs to be done once and that saves everyone time and money.
not rated yet Sep 02, 2016
If Apple did not violate any Irish laws what claim does the EU have on Apple?

Irish tax law is 12.5% for companies (which is already very low and is intentionally that way because Ireland wanted to attract company investments).
Apple paid 0.005%. The two numbers don't match.

The EU just says that apple should pay the 12.5% (which amounts to the stated 13bn EUR). The issue the EU has is not with whether Ireland sets a high or low tax rate compared to other EU countries. Fiscal policy is soverign matter for each country.
The Issue the EU has is only that any such tax rate be applied fairly to all companies that do business in each country.
Because if you tax company A at 12.5% and company B at 0.005% then the country is effectively giving company B an unfair advantage over company A. And that kind of special ineterst protectionism isn't allowed by EU law.
not rated yet Sep 02, 2016
Now, the reason why the US government is crying 'foul' is not because the EU is telling Apple to pay taxes. The problem they have is that Apple might actually pay them.

Because the US has been trying to get Apple to pay taxes in the US. But if they already paid elsewher then there is less grounds for forcing them to pay any in the US. So it's perfectly fine (from a US POV) that Apple shirk taxes elsewhere because that leaves the door open for the US eventually collecting them.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.