The 'great smoky dragon' of quantum physics

March 10, 2016, University of Vienna

University of Vienna physicists have, for the first time, evaluated the almost 100-year long history of quantum delayed-choice experiments—from the theoretical beginnings with Albert Einstein to the latest research works in the present. The extensive study now appeared in the renowned journal Reviews of Modern Physics.

Since the 17th century, science was intrigued by the nature of light. Isaac Newton was certain that it consists of a stream of particles. His contemporary Christiaan Huygens, however, argued that light is a wave. Modern quantum physics says that both were right. Light can be observed both as particles and as waves—depending which characteristic is measured in an experiment, it presents itself more as one or the other. This so-called wave-particle dualism is one of the foundational principles of quantum physics. This questions our common sense: can one and the same indeed be of two contradictory natures at the same time?

Measuring the undefined

In the 1970s, the American physicist John Archibald Wheeler (1911-2008) metaphorically compared the fundamental indefiniteness of quantum mechanical phenomena with a "great smoky dragon": One can see the tail, that is the source of the particles, and the head, which are the measurement results. But in between the whole body is covered in smoke. And this smoke cannot be removed: Only the measurement defines the phenomenon, not the other way round. To put this concept into a concrete setting, Wheeler proposed his famous delayed-choice . In this thought experiment, the choice to determine the particle or wave nature is delayed or even changed during the experiment. Thereby, one and the same phenomenon, for instance light, manifests itself as a particle or as a wave in the same experiment. It can therefore indeed be both, depending on the time and nature of the measurement.

In the past decades, quantum physicists have tried to experimentally test Wheeler's thought experiment to empirically substantiate the wave-particle duality. Xiao-song Ma from the Nanjing University, Johannes Kofler from the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics, and Anton Zeilinger from the University of Vienna and the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences have now shown the success of this endeavor in an extensive study, which sums up and evaluates the whole history of delayed choice experiments.

While the concept of wave-particle duality can be traced back to Albert Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect via photons in 1905, it took until the 1980s that the first delayed-choice experiments were realized. "Only through the development of modern quantum optical techniques for the fast and precise measurement of light it was possible to put Wheeler's thought experiment into practice", says Xiao-song Ma, lead author of the study.

Important for quantum cryptography and quantum computers

"Experiments of this kind confront us with fundamental questions of quantum physics", adds Anton Zeilinger. "However, they also have significance for future applications such as in quantum cryptography or the development of quantum computers." Delayed-choice experiments can be applied to the quantum mechanical phenomenon of entanglement, which is important for the security of quantum communication. Regarding quantum computers, there are certain scenarios where delayed-choice experiments can increase the computation speed. The authors of the study, which now appeared in the journal Reviews of Modern Physics, expect that delayed-choice experiments will continue to bring further insights into as well as practical applications for technologies basing on them.

Explore further: A non-causal quantum eraser

More information: Xiao-song Ma et al. Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations, Reviews of Modern Physics (2016). DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015005

Related Stories

A non-causal quantum eraser

January 9, 2013

Whether a quantum object behaves like a wave or like a particle depends (according to the Copenhagen interpretation) on the choice of measurement apparatus used for observing the system, and therefore on the type of measurement ...

Three 'twisted' photons in 3 dimensions

February 29, 2016

Researchers at the Institute of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, the University of Vienna, and the Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona have achieved a new milestone in quantum physics: they were able to entangle three ...

Experiment confirms quantum theory weirdness

May 27, 2015

The bizarre nature of reality as laid out by quantum theory has survived another test, with scientists performing a famous experiment and proving that reality does not exist until it is measured.

Quantum physics mimics spooky action into the past

April 23, 2012

Physicists of the group of Prof. Anton Zeilinger at the Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information (IQOQI), the University of Vienna, and the Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology (VCQ) have, for the ...

Quantum experiments designed by machines

February 22, 2016

Quantum physicist Mario Krenn and his colleagues in the group of Anton Zeilinger from the Faculty of Physics at the University of Vienna and the Austrian Academy of Sciences have developed an algorithm which designs new useful ...

Recommended for you

Tangled magnetic fields power cosmic particle accelerators

December 13, 2018

Magnetic field lines tangled like spaghetti in a bowl might be behind the most powerful particle accelerators in the universe. That's the result of a new computational study by researchers from the Department of Energy's ...

Stretched quantum magnetism uncovered by quantum simulation

December 13, 2018

By studying ultracold atoms trapped in artificial crystals of light, Guillaume Salomon, a postdoc at the Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics and a team of scientists have been able to directly observe a fundamental effect ...

The secret life of cloud droplets

December 13, 2018

Do water droplets cluster inside clouds? Researchers confirm two decades of theory with an airborne imaging instrument.

25 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

arom
Mar 10, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Hyperfuzzy
1 / 5 (3) Mar 11, 2016
This is silly. The particle emits waves wither it enters the slit or not. The "photon" is 1/surface area of the sphere about the particle. It is a field not a particle. Who makes this $hit up? OK, a thought experiment, aren't we in enough trouble over-thinking physics?
Whydening Gyre
not rated yet Mar 11, 2016
Spin.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 16, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 17, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 17, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
compose
Mar 17, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2016
It's an intentional strategy: the priests of mainstream science don't want to lose their informational monopoly
@ZEPH
sorry, this is still BS

the problem you have with mainstream science is that it requires (keyword= *requires*) you to present evidence for a claim, and then replicate and validate said evidence

this is where you pseudoscience idiots fail every time, and then when you do, you claim "conspiracy" and make the statements like you do above b/c of your personal failure and the fact that science proves you wrong, an idiot, and believing in something "without evidence" - aka a faith, which you promote like a fanatic, making you religious
The attitude of mainstream science is based on so-called pluralistic ignorance
no, that is the attitude of pseudoscience like yours

that and D-K along with delusional fanatical adherence to known debunked beliefs
again, you built a devotion to and around your *beliefs* making your pseudoscience a religion
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2016
@zeph cont'd
The scientists believe as a single man, the dense aether concept is BS and that it has been disproved by experiments (because they didn't actually understand their physical meaning)
and here is the problem with that...
the reality is that *you* personally don't understand the meaning of the evidence, not that the evidence wasn't understood by the scientists

this can be proven by your adherence to known failed beliefs
Oh, & BTW... scientists don't "believe as a single man" anything, they simply followed the evidence and accepted it's conclusions and figured out (unlike you) that further continuance towards the proposed hypothesis would be stupidly invested time and money and a waste of valuable resources which found (ta-da) the Higgs, Gravity Waves, CMBR, or any other research out there which paid off

what is a pseudoscience conspiracy theorist to do when their livelihood is debunked?
well, as you proved - they repeat the mantra (see your quote/posts)
compose
Mar 17, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2016
Who is compose - Docile
@Phys1
compose/docile is ZEPHIR, the aether religion acolyte
(and he uses the pluralistic ignorance argument a lot, BTW)

more zephir names:

tirahobis, pehawev, yefeb, bikuxem, retejap, xanuxul, debokolin, gipagajege, yejen, godivecu, befa, rovodeh, vudamezire, cuyajuyino, yolepugor, begalifowi, megayugo, juhodo, bibigak, fetem, sosamuca, serijopi, kefof, kuresehe, sator, rihumoyax, otero, Doiea, Technico, nesac, tirahobis, pahawev, yefeb, bikuxem, retejap, xanuxul, debokolin, gipagajege, yejen, godivecu, befa, rovodeh, vudamezire, cuyajuyino, yolepugor, megayuyo, begalifowi, juhodo, bibigak, fetem, susamuca, Lesea, Deisa, vse97513, zetazov, kuresehe, sator, rihumoyax, Eset, Masuzole, Timen, porah, zesuja, leticu, fewitofosa, rhsthjnty, Dethe, Losik, Accata, lajib, hewewa, ciduvutus

just a small sample of names used on PO alone
Captain Stumpy
5 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2016
"Truth, like gold, is not to be obtained by its growth, but by washing away from it all that is not gold." — Leo Tolstoy
@zeph
problem is that "truth" is entirely subjective unless, and this is important, unless everyone abides by the same set of rules to govern what truth really is

this is the power of the scientific method that you refuse to accept
it's "truth" demonstrates (repeatedly) that you are a believer in a faith (as in, there is no evidence supporting your belief)

by definition of the scientific method, this makes you a religious acolyte, not one who seeks "truth"

therefore, proselytizing about your beliefs makes you a chronic liar just as much as any creationist here

i will reiterate this for you:
just because *you* can't understand the evidence doesn't mean that no one else can either
compose
Mar 17, 2016
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Uncle Ira
3 / 5 (2) Mar 17, 2016
Who is compose. Some time ago there was a crank here who permanent claimed that evidence and math based consensus was pluralistic ignorance.
He must have gotten himself kicked off PO and came back 3 weeks ago as compose.


Ol Zephir-Skippy has been around here for 10 or 9 years. He always comes back. After a couple of years of him, he kind of grows on you. (And he is a lot more science smart than Bennie-Skippy and Really-Skippy.)
Uncle Ira
1 / 5 (1) Mar 17, 2016
LOL, http://i.imgur.com/LDpsrvh.gifv. It's rather difficult to deny the ignorance of mainstream physics proponents, once we have public demonstration of it right here. The other scientists just think and "argue" in similar way.

Is it true, what CS writes about you ,
that you have accounts all or many of these names?
Please deny or confirm.


That's not even half of them,,,,
ValeriaT, Yashi17, Netello, Franklins, Callista, Simplimco, Pejico, Writela, Sikla, Jizby, Zwentoo, etc and so on and forever.
vidyunmaya
not rated yet Mar 19, 2016
Sub; IYL 2015 transcends to Conscious Spirit-cosmology-origins
Cosmic consciousness helps revise Cosmology- My book 2000.
Cosmology vedas Interlinks-Divine Frames-magnetic Fields- Uplinks Knowledge Base
Sciennce to philosophy and Nature Provides various Facets of light- see Heart of the Universe-
Cosmos Quest-4-Nature Divine By Vidyardhi Nanduri
http://www.youtub...ure=plcp
Invisible -visible matrix is part of Cosmic Function of the Universe. The super-imposition
of this matrix is presented by me at the Galactic Plane- see COSPAR-2013, Bangkok conference and Highlighted in my ESA proposals
around Sun and more in books. 15 books at www[dot]lulu [dot]com-spotlight-jnani108

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.