Core-shell nanostructures show promise in production of fuel gases

Core-shell nanostructures show promise in production of fuel gases
Nanostructures fabricated with iron oxide and titanium dioxide are seen magnified to 250,000 times their actual size. Research led by Kun Yao, a faculty member in the University of Georgia College of Engineering, demonstrated these core-shell nanostructures are more efficient at using solar energy to produce fuel gases than single-layer nanostructures.

Researchers at the University of Georgia have created a nanostructure that could provide a path toward using solar energy more efficiently in the production of fuel gases.

Writing in the journal Catalysis Today, the scientists say nanostructures fabricated from a core of iron oxide and coated with a shell of titanium dioxide absorb more than single-layer nanostructures.

The findings may eventually lead to advances in a number of applications-ranging from energy production to electronics-according to Kun Yao, a lecturer and clean room manager in the UGA College of Engineering who served as lead investigator on the project.

"In recent years, researchers looking for a sustainable solution to the world's long-term energy needs have been exploring methods to use solar energy more efficiently," Yao said. "One promising strategy is to design and fabricate highly efficient photocatalysts that use solar illumination to facilitate chemical reactions that produce a fuel, reduce pollution or both."

In its paper, the research team said nanostructures fabricated from titanium dioxide, or TiO2, have been investigated extensively for solar water splitting, carbon dioxide conversion and environmental decontamination. The compound's non-toxicity, low cost and high stability make it particularly suitable for those applications.

Core-shell nanostructures show promise in production of fuel gases
This cross-section view of the nanostructures shows a darker inner core of iron oxide coated with a layer of titanium dioxide.

While titanium dioxide is an effective and widely available photocatalyst, it has a major drawback: It only absorbs ultraviolet light. This means TiO2 can only use approximately 5 percent of the sun's energy, Yao explained.

To improve the efficiency of the nanostructure, the researchers created a core of and then applied a shell of titanium dioxide. Iron oxide is able to absorb visible light, the largest section of the solar spectrum.

The researchers tested their composite nanostructure by attempting to convert carbon dioxide into fuel gases. Using only ambient sunlight, their core-shell nanostructure proved nearly five times as efficient at converting carbon dioxide and water into hydrogen gas than a nanostructure composed of alone. Their nanostructure also demonstrated improved performance in the conversion of into water vapor, methane and methanol. They report the conversion occurred within a few hours—and the longer the nanostructure was exposed to sunlight, the more fuel gases it produced.

While the results of the study are promising, Yao believes there are several strategies that may make the core-shell nanostructure even more efficient.

"Scientists working in the field of nanostructures are looking at processes that may not have a direct application for 10 or 15 years, so in a sense we are all pioneers," Yao said. "But we should always work to improve our understanding of the field and lay the groundwork for future generations."

More information: Kun Yao et al. Fe2O3–TiO2 core–shell nanorod arrays for visible light photocatalytic applications, Catalysis Today (2015). DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.10.026

Citation: Core-shell nanostructures show promise in production of fuel gases (2016, March 14) retrieved 30 May 2024 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

New solar-powered organic compound to tackle air and water pollution


Feedback to editors