Genetic 'paint box' shuffled between butterfly species to create new wing patterns

Genetic 'paint box' shuffled between butterfly species to create new wing patterns
One of the Heliconius butterfly species, melpomene aglaope, with both the dennis forewing red patches and ray hindwing red pattern is shown. Research shows these two red color patterns are controlled by separate genetic switches that arose in completely different species. Credit: Jiggins group, Cambridge.

New research on butterfly genomes has revealed that the genetic components that produce different splotches of colour on wings can be mixed up between species by interbreeding to create new patterns, like a "genetic paint-box".

Research on Amazonian Heliconius butterflies has shown that two of the most common colour patterns, found in combination on the wings of many Heliconius - the dennis red patch on the base of the forewing, and the ray red streaks that fan out across the hindwing - are controlled by separate genetic switches that arose in completely different species.

A team of researchers has traced the merging of these two wing pattern elements to interbreeding between butterfly species that occurred almost two million years ago.

It has been known for some time that exchange of genes between species can be important for evolution: humans have exchanged genes with our now extinct relatives which may help survival at high altitudes, and Darwin's Finches have exchanged a gene that influences beak shape. In butterflies, the swapping of wing pattern elements allows different species to share common warning signs that ward off predators - a phenomenon known as mimicry.

However, the new study, published today in the journal PLOS Biology, is the first to show such mixing of genetic material can produce entirely new wing patterns, by generating new combinations of genes.

Genetic 'paint box' shuffled between butterfly species to create new wing patterns
Genetic switches for dennis and ray wing patterns in Heliconius butterflies, located next to each other in a Heliconius genome. Credit: Jiggins group, Cambridge.

"We found that different colour patches on the wings are controlled by different genetic switches that can be turned on and off independently. As these switches were shared between species they got jumbled up into different combinations, making new wing patterns," said senior author Professor Chris Jiggins, from Cambridge University's Department of Zoology.

The researchers sequenced the genomes from 142 individual butterflies across 17 Heliconius species and compared the DNA data, focusing on the regions associated with the two red colour patterns of dennis and ray on the forewing and hindwing. "In each butterfly genome, we narrowed down around 300 million base pairs of DNA to just a few thousand," said Jiggins.

They found that the genetic switches for these distinct wing splotches operated independently, despite being located next to each other in the genome. The sequencing revealed that the switch for each colour splotch had evolved just once, and in separate species, but had been repeatedly shared across all the Heliconius species at occasional points of interbreeding dating back almost two million years.

"By identifying the associated with bits of wing pattern, when they evolved and how they diverged, we can actually map onto the species tree how these little regions of colour have jumped between species - and we can see they are jumping about all over the place!" said Jiggins.

Genetic 'paint box' shuffled between butterfly species to create new wing patterns
A range of wing pattern combinations in various Heliconius butterfly species. Clockwise from top left: elevatus; contigua; rosina; meriana; malleti. Credit: Jiggins group, Cambridge.

The key to this evolutionary butterfly painting is the independence of each genetic switch. "The gene that these switches are controlling is identical in all these butterflies, it is coding for the same protein each time. That can't change as the gene is doing other important things," said lead author Dr Richard Wallbank, also from Cambridge's Department of Zoology.

"It is the switches that are independent, which is much more subtle and powerful, allowing evolutionary tinkering with the wing pattern without affecting parts of the genetic software that control the brain or eyes.

"This modularity means switching on a tiny piece of the gene's DNA produces one piece of pattern or another on the wings - like a genetic paint box," Wallbank said.

Explore further

An eye gene colors butterfly wings red

More information: Richard W. R. Wallbank et al. Evolutionary Novelty in a Butterfly Wing Pattern through Enhancer Shuffling, PLOS Biology (2016). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002353
Journal information: PLoS Biology

Citation: Genetic 'paint box' shuffled between butterfly species to create new wing patterns (2016, January 15) retrieved 22 September 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Jan 15, 2016
Some Girls Need'em!

Jan 16, 2016
The "scientific" definition of species is something that cannot breed with another such and produce a viable offspring. Two species cannot interbreed and produce a viable offspring. If they are observing a new wing pattern, then it is in individuals who cannot produce offspring and so cannot represent a new line. But, then, they may simply be lying about two different "species" of butterfly and simply be referring to two different sub species, sometimes called "phases" of butterflies. So "evolution" is not occurring here, no matter how much this may be intended to suggest it.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more