'Common' animal species are not that common and rare species are rare

September 28, 2015, Macquarie University
‘Common’ animal species are not that common and rare species are rare
Credit: Dr John Alroy

New research by Dr John Alroy in the Department of Biological Sciences suggests that current models describing the commonality and dominance of a few species in any one community are incorrect, and that there is actually a limit to the number of species thought of as 'rare'.

The research, published in Science Advances, is based on study of more than 1000 lists of species representing different from around the world, from bats to trees to butterflies. It is the first study of its kind to include a global, diverse data set.

"The idea that communities of species are open to all newcomers goes back to theoretical work in the 1960s that argued in favour of certain mathematical models of communities. These models try to predict how many individuals belong to the most , and then to the second-most common one, and so on in any particular community," said Dr Alroy.

Previous models assumed either that species compete for just a single resource or that competition is not strong. Dr Alroy explained the data with a new model that assumes species compete strongly for two resources, such as light and nutrients or physical space and water.

"Common species in these ecological communities are simply not that common. It's almost never true that, for example, half of the individuals in any one place belong to a single species. Instead, there's often no significant difference between the abundance of the and the abundance of the next few species down the line," said Dr Alroy.

"For example, if you look at a group of frogs in a pond, there will generally be only a few species. Other species of frogs may try to join the community, but will be kept out by competition for resources. That's why common species and rare species are both not seen very often."

"In general, I found that there aren't nearly as many rare species as most ecologists would lead you to believe. In most places, there is actually a fairly equal distribution of abundances. If this is true, then the richness of ecological communities and of the entire globe could be quite strongly limited," said Dr Alroy.

Explore further: Parasitic disease: Contact rates, competition matter in transmission

More information: "The shape of terrestrial abundance distributions." Science Advances 25 Sep 2015: DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500082

Related Stories

Genetic mutants alter entire biological communities

September 10, 2015

Scientists from Trinity College Dublin have discovered that one gene mutation in a single species can trigger dramatic changes in whole biological communities; changes can be as great as those caused by the extinction of ...

Recommended for you

Overspending on defense arsenal bankrupts a plant's economy

October 22, 2018

Defend or grow? Can plants do both at the same time? Michigan State University scientists might be inching closer to answering these questions. The answers matter. They could someday help us understand natural ecosystems ...

Cells that change jobs to fight diabetes

October 22, 2018

Diabetes is characterized by persistent high blood sugar levels that occur when certain cells in the pancreas—the insulin-producing β cells—are destroyed or are no longer able to secrete insulin. Researchers at the University ...

Spotlighting differences in closely-related species

October 22, 2018

There are millions of fungal species, and those few hundred found in the Aspergillus genus play important roles in areas ranging from industrial production to agricultural plant pathogens. Reported October 22, 2018, in Nature ...

0 comments

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.