Sustainability progress should precede seafood market access, researchers urge

Earth
A composite image of the Western hemisphere of the Earth. Credit: NASA

Demand for seafood from wild fisheries and aquaculture around the world has nearly doubled over the past four decades. In the past several years, major retailers in developed countries have committed to source their seafood from only sustainably certified fisheries and aquaculture, even though it is not clear where that supply will come from.

A team of researchers led by the University of California, Davis, has focused its attention on fishery improvement projects, or FIPs, which are designed to bring from wild fisheries to the certified market, with only a promise of sustainability in the future. They conclude that FIPs need to be fine tuned to ensure that fisheries are delivering on their promises.

The researchers' policy forum titled "Secure Sustainable Seafood from Developing Countries" will be published May 1 in the journal Science.

"We're cautiously optimistic that fishery improvement projects, which fast-track access to international markets, can lead to sustainable fisheries, especially in developing countries," said UC Davis Professor James Sanchirico, associate director of the UC Davis Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute.

Encouraging sustainable seafood:

Retailers like Walmart in the U.S. and Sainsbury's in the U.K. have promised that soon all the fresh, frozen, farmed and wild seafood they sell will come from sustainable sources. Respected, private third-party certifying programs like the Marine Stewardship Council are helping to ensure compliance with meaningful designed to help conserve fish populations and protect oceans.

While many of the sustainability standards have been met by commercial fisheries in the developed world, fisheries overseen by developing countries make up only 7 percent of MSC-certified fisheries, even though these developing-country fisheries account for about half of all seafood entering the international market.

Fishery improvement projects

Fishery improvement projects aim to get fisheries on a path to sustainability and potentially certification by the MSC. These projects involve partnerships between the fishermen and firms up and down the international seafood supply chain. A critical objective of the partnerships is to create market incentives for improvements by allowing seafood from these developing-country fisheries to enter the potentially more lucrative export market for certified seafood.

"It is hoped that the projects will protect marine life and ecosystems in areas where local and national governments have not acted to oversee sustainable practices, while also satisfying the demand for ," said Gabriel Sampson, UC Davis graduate student and lead author of the study.

Potential 'race to the bottom' in standards:

Sampson and colleagues report that seafood from two-thirds of developing-world fisheries enrolled in fishery improvement projects is already being bought by retailers, intending to satisfy their sustainability commitments while making little progress in improving their management.

Fishery management reforms should include data collection and ongoing monitoring, strengthening harvest and access rights to the resources, limits on the catch, and instituting traceability throughout the supply chain, the researchers say. If access to the fisheries is not better regulated, the current efforts by retailers to secure sustainable, wild-caught seafood could stimulate a "race to fish" and ultimately undermine the sustainability claims.

Without the proper safeguards to ensure progress and reforms in fishery improvement projects, with full sustainability certification could find their market benefits diluted by the increased competition for a share of the global certified seafood market.

Having multiple types of certified seafood in the market could lead to a "race to the bottom" in sustainability standards, unless the fishery improvement projects are carefully monitored to make sure that seafood retailers closely adhere to the sustainable-improvement requirements for market access.

"The retailers and organizations involved with managing fishery improvement projects need to insist on progress toward reforms from the fishery as a condition for purchasing seafood from that fishery," Sanchirico said.

"This would likely lead to more durable conservation and greater assurance for consumers that marketing claims of 'sustainable' seafood are valid," he said.


Explore further

Fishes' large carbon footprints to be included in seafood eco-labeling

More information: Secure sustainable seafood from developing countries, www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/ … 1126/science.aaa4639
Journal information: Science

Provided by UC Davis
Citation: Sustainability progress should precede seafood market access, researchers urge (2015, April 30) retrieved 24 August 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2015-04-sustainability-seafood-access-urge.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
47 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 30, 2015
This all sounds great - but the fact is giving access to only certified fisheries without providing some sort of additional price benefit only helps the big guys who can afford the equipment to get the economies of scale needed to offset the cost of certification. My understanding is that MSC certified fisheries get no price premium over non-certified fisheries. Consumers do not want to pay more and retailers simply refuse to- using the argument as laid out above. The market as it stands often only provides 5-15% of the final retail valuation to the primary producers- fishermen and farmers etc while the upstream interests (wholesalers, distributors and retailers) take the rest.

May 01, 2015
I would suggest a small alteration in the text: Please change all the instances of "could" into "WILL", so that phrases as "could lead to a race to the bottom" will make more sense as this is already happening.

The best bet for the oceans is that the fisheries get exhausted as soon as possible so that the market crashes in the same way the wale product market crashed in the past... which is the only reason why we stopped waling.

I don't see any future to the oceans future and "Sustainable fisheries" is nothing but a red herring the size of a blue wale.

May 01, 2015
@enricm
Clearly, you have biased and privileged view of the situation. Billions of people rely on the oceans for their sustenance. That you would eagerly condemn them to starvation is reprehensible. While it is obvious that the oceanic ecosystems are being damaged by mismanagement, the solution is definitely not to over-fish until they're all gone, but rather to find ways to better manage the aquatic harvests that feed so many.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more