Australia set to pay polluters to cut emissions

October 31, 2014
In this file photo, the Hazelwood power station billows smoke from its exhaust stacks in the Latrobe Valley, 150 km east of Melbourne, on August 13, 2009

Australia is set to approve measures giving polluters financial incentives to reduce emissions blamed for climate change, in a move critics described as ineffective environmental policy.

The so-called "direct action" plan, which will see the government pay companies to increase energy efficiency, passed through the upper house Senate early Friday following a marathon debate.

The bill is expected to be approved next month by the lower House of Representatives where the conservative government of Prime Minister Tony Abbott has a majority.

It comes after Abbott axed a tax on introduced by the previous Labor administration, fulfilling a central pledge from last year's elections.

"We have delivered on our promise to implement an emissions reduction fund to ensure that there is real and practical action to achieve our emissions goals and targets without a carbon tax," Environment Minister Greg Hunt told reporters.

China and the United States are the biggest greenhouse gas polluters, according to a report by international scientists issued last month, but Australia's output is considered high per capita.

The Aus$2.55 billion (US$2.25 billion) Emissions Reduction Fund is part of the government's plan to meet its emissions reduction target of five percent below 2000 levels by 2020.

Under the plan, competitive auctions will be held, with the government entering into contracts to buy emissions reductions from successful bidders at the lowest cost, Hunt said.

Australia's Prime Minister Tony Abbott, pictured during a press conference in Sydney, on September 19, 2014

He added that the reductions would be "real and significant" as payments would only be made when the pollution cuts occur.

'Not the right way to go'

But the Labor opposition leader Bill Shorten criticised the scheme, describing it as "paying big polluters to keep polluting, which is terrible policy".

"In terms of 'Direct Action', Labor just doesn't believe it is the right way to go. We believe in trusting the marketplace to set the price signal," Shorten said Friday.

The policy has also been slammed by the Greens party, with leader Christine Milne saying there was "no modelling or any evidence to suggest it will do anything at all to reduce pollution".

The plan passed with the backing of the Palmer United Party. As part of the government's deal with mining magnate Clive Palmer's party, Hunt agreed to keep the Climate Change Authority (CCA) and set up a three-stage, 18-month inquiry into an (ETS).

The government had been planning to abolish the CCA, an independent agency set up by the previous government.

The University of Queensland's John Quiggin, a CCA member and economics professor, welcomed the inquiry into an ETS.

"The overwhelming view of economists is that a price-based measure such as an ETS is a critical component of a carbon mitigation policy," Quiggin said.

Although the government rejected setting aside some of the fund to purchase international carbon credits, environmental economist Caroline Sullivan said similar offset schemes within Australia should be considered.

Carbon offset schemes allow individuals or firms a way to reduce their carbon footprint by investing in projects that absorb greenhouse gases.

"This relatively large sum of money (from the fund) can not only help to motivate carbon reductions from large emitters, but could also provide a hugely important—and much needed—economic stimulus for rural and regional Australia," Sullivan, from Southern Cross University, said.

Explore further: Blow for Australia government as carbon tax repeal fails

Related Stories

Australia abolishes divisive carbon tax

July 17, 2014

Australia on Thursday axed a divisive carbon tax after years of vexed political debate, in a move criticised as regressive and out of step with the rest of the world.

Repeal of Australia's carbon tax moves closer

November 21, 2013

A bill to abolish an Australian carbon tax designed to combat climate change cleared parliament's lower house Thursday with the new conservative government saying "it doesn't work".

Australia PM moves to repeal climate tax

November 13, 2013

Australia's new conservative Prime Minister Tony Abbott Wednesday moved to abolish a carbon tax designed to combat climate change as his first major economic reform since taking office.

Recommended for you

Hot spot at Hawaii? Not so fast

August 18, 2017

Through analysis of volcanic tracks, Rice University geophysicists have concluded that hot spots like those that formed the Hawaiian Islands aren't moving as fast as recently thought.

Supervolcanoes: A key to America's electric future?

August 16, 2017

Most of the lithium used to make the lithium-ion batteries that power modern electronics comes from Australia and Chile. But Stanford scientists say there are large deposits in sources right here in America: supervolcanoes.

Greenland ice flow likely to speed up

August 16, 2017

Flow of the Greenland Ice Sheet is likely to speed up in the future, despite a recent slowdown, because its outlet glaciers slide over wet sediment, not hard rock, new research based on seismic surveys has confirmed. This ...

Climate change will cut crop yields: study

August 15, 2017

Climate change will have a negative effect on key crops such as wheat, rice, and maize, according to a major scientific report out Tuesday that reviewed 70 prior studies on global warming and agriculture.

8 comments

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

gkam
3 / 5 (2) Oct 31, 2014
It's ransom!

Make the polluters clean up their own disgusting toxics!
rp142
5 / 5 (2) Oct 31, 2014
The Australian government has been raising taxes, cutting services and creating new taxes to address a budget emergency. We are told that revenue has simply not kept up with government spending and it is unsustainable.

Taxes of polluters have been removed and replaced with spending of billions to polluters... There is a liar at work somewhere in this. Do our taxes go up again to pay for this? How can anyone argue that they don't when they just go into the same pool of government revenue as all other taxes?

Does it have anything to do with the fact that business groups are big funding sources for the party in government? Corruption in the open?
marcush
5 / 5 (2) Nov 01, 2014
As an Aussie expat I simply cannot understand how my fellow Australians could have voted this government in. Everything they have done was absolutely predictable given Abbots track record and trivial Labour leadership issues are certainly no excuse. I am greatly saddened at what has occurred in my country.
aksdad
2 / 5 (4) Nov 01, 2014
"Pollutant"? I thought carbon dioxide was essential to all plant life on earth. My bad.
zz5555
4.5 / 5 (4) Nov 01, 2014
Hmm, I thought everyone knew that too much of something, though essential for life, can be very bad. Other things that are essential for life, but for which too much can be harmful or fatal: oxygen, water, vitamin A, heat, etc. So I guess it is "your bad". ;)
gkam
2.5 / 5 (2) Nov 02, 2014
Are they going to pay rapists to stop the rapes, and killers to stop killing,too?
Eikka
4 / 5 (2) Nov 19, 2014
Make the polluters clean up their own disgusting toxics!


I agree. Every producer of energy should by principle deal with the problems they cause out of their own pocket, not externalize them to the society.

Don't you agree?

http://www.telegr...ity.html

gkam
1 / 5 (2) Nov 19, 2014
"I agree. Every producer of energy should by principle deal with the problems they cause out of their own pocket, not externalize them to the society."
-----------------------------------
You can start with nukes, then go to coal, then to oil and gas.

That wind thing was because you folk have not yet learned how to do what we have been doing for decades. You re caught up in European politics, with Old country grudges and nationalism. Go the the next storm and find out how wind provided over 50% of the electricity during the storm.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.