Number of days without rain to dramatically increase in some world regions

March 14, 2014
CMIP5 multi-model ensemble average mean change in frequency of dry days (days/year) by 2060–2089, relative to the historical period 1960–1989, using the RCP8.5 forcing scenario.Credit: Scientific Reports

( —By the end of the 21st century, some parts of the world can expect as many as 30 more days a year without precipitation, according to a new study by Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego researchers.

Ongoing caused by human influences will alter the nature of how rain and snow falls; areas that are prone to dry conditions will receive their in narrower windows of time. Computer model projections of future conditions analyzed by the Scripps team indicate that regions such as the Amazon, Central America, Indonesia, and all Mediterranean regions around the world will likely see the greatest increase in the number of "dry days" per year, going without rain for as many as 30 days more every year. California, with its Mediterranean climate, is likely to have five to ten more dry days per year.

This analysis advances a trend in to understand climate change on the level of daily weather and on finer geographic scales.

"Changes in intensity of precipitation events and duration of intervals between those events will have direct effects on vegetation and soil moisture," said Stephen Jackson, director of the U.S. Department of the Interior Southwest Climate Science Center, which co-funded the study. "(Study lead author Suraj) Polade and colleagues provide analyses that will be of considerable value to natural resource managers in climate adaptation and planning. Their study represents an important milestone in improving ecological and hydrological forecasting under climate change."

CMIP5 multi-model ensemble average change in (a) interannual variability of precipitation scaled by historical mean annual precipitation; (b) frequency of precipitation days (%). Credit: Scientific Reports

Polade, a postdoctoral researcher at Scripps, said that one of the implications of this finding is that annual rainfall could become less reliable in drying regions as annual averages will be calculated over a smaller number of days. The 28 models used by the team showed agreement in many parts of the world on the change in the number of dry days those regions will receive. They were in less agreement about how intense rain or snow will be when it does fall, although there is general consensus among models that the most will become more frequent. Climate models agreed even less on how the conflicting daily changes affect annual mean rainfall.

"Looking at changes in the number of dry days per year is a new way of understanding how climate change will affect us that goes beyond just annual or seasonal mean precipitation changes, and allows us to better adapt to and mitigate the impacts of local hydrological changes," said Polade, a postdoctoral researcher who works with Scripps climate scientists Dan Cayan, David Pierce, Alexander Gershunov, and Michael Dettinger, who are co-authors of the study.

In regions like the American Southwest, where precipitation is historically infrequent and where a couple of storms more or fewer can make a wet or a dry year, annual water accumulation varies greatly. A decrease in precipitation frequency translates into even more year-to-year variability in fresh water resources for the Southwest.

"These profound and clearly projected changes make physical and statistical sense, but they are invisible when looking at long-term trends in average climate projections," Gershunov said.

Other regions of the world, most of which are climatologically wet, are projected to receive more frequent precipitation. Most such regions are not on land or are largely uninhabited, the equatorial Pacific Ocean and the Arctic prominent among them.

The authors suggest that follow-up studies should emphasize more fine-scale analyses of dry day occurrences and work towards understanding the myriad regional factors that influence precipitation.

"Climate models have improved greatly in the last 10 years, which allows us to look in detail at the simulation of daily weather rather than just monthly averages," said Pierce.

Explore further: Global precipitation variability decreased from 1940 to 2009

More information: Besides the Southwest Climate Science Center, the NOAA Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments program provided major funding for the study, which appears in Scientific Reports, the open-access journal from Nature Publishing Group.

Related Stories

Global precipitation variability decreased from 1940 to 2009

October 29, 2012

One of the strongly held assumptions of climate change is that the variability of precipitation will grow with an increase in temperature. Storms will become heavier but less frequent. Flash floods and droughts will increase. ...

Statistically linking extreme precipitation to global warming

September 24, 2013

Extreme rainfall can have serious effects on societies and ecosystems. Increases in extreme precipitation events are predicted to occur as Earth's climate warms, in part because warmer air has greater capacity to hold moisture, ...

Climate models are not good enough, researcher says

March 25, 2013

Only a few climate models were able to reproduce the observed changes in extreme precipitation in China over the last 50 years. This is the finding of a doctoral thesis from the University of Gothenburg, Sweden.

Regional models expect drier, stormier western United States

March 31, 2012

As American southwestern states struggle against ongoing drought, and the Northwest braces for a projected shift from a snow- to a rain-dominated hydrological system, climate researchers strive to provide precipitation projections ...

Recommended for you

Mysterious deep-Earth seismic signature explained

November 22, 2017

New research on oxygen and iron chemistry under the extreme conditions found deep inside the Earth could explain a longstanding seismic mystery called ultralow velocity zones. Published in Nature, the findings could have ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

2.3 / 5 (9) Mar 14, 2014
Climate models have improved greatly in the last 10 years, which allows us to look in detail at the simulation of daily weather rather than just monthly averages

Whatever improvement there may be, it isn't reflected in surface temperature projections. IPCC AR5 shows that virtually all the models from the 2007 report have no skill at predicting global surface temperatures in 2013.


It gets worse with each passing year. With performance this poor, any projections based on global climate models should be viewed with healthy skepticism until the models are refined to better reflect what nature is actually that's even possible.
4.4 / 5 (7) Mar 14, 2014
With performance this poor, any projections based on global climate models should be viewed with healthy skepticism

I completely disagree with your analysis. @aksdad, If anything, prior analysis has underestimating the amount and depth of warming. I thing the IPCC is too conservative. Deniers keep pushing this crap that the IPCC reports are exaggerated or false. Most of these people are anti-science dim bulbs that need replacing. It sounds like your one of them.

The science is overwhelming, you can expect a 1.0C to 4.0C increase in global average temperatures by 2100. If your position is the right-wing conservative position that there is no such thing as global warming; then you own the future you get POS.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.