Steering by peeking: Physicists control quantum particles by looking at them

February 17, 2014, Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)
The state of the nuclear spin, visualised by the arrow, after measurements with varying strengths (light blue is very weak, dark blue is very strong). For increasing measurement strength, the state rotates towards the classical up state (arrow pointing up). This data is post-selected on one specific measurement outcome of the electron spin. For the other outcome, the arrow rotates downwards. Credit: Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)

Scientists from the FOM Foundation and Delft University of Technology have manipulated a quantum particle, merely by looking at it in a smart way. By adjusting the strength of their measurement according to earlier measurement outcomes, they managed to steer the particle towards a desired state. The scientists published their results online on 16 February 2014 in Nature Physics.

In two states at once

Quantum mechanics describes the behaviour of microscopic particles, such as atoms and electrons. When we compare it to our observations in everyday life, nature behaves very strangely at the scale of these particles. For instance, an electron can be in two states at the same time.

To demonstrate how peculiar this property is, the physicist Erwin Schrödinger proposed a famous thought experiment where the state of a quantum particle is linked to the fate of a cat. The two are situated in a sealed box. The quantum particle acts as a switch that can either open (switch on) or close (switch off) a small flask of poison. As long as the can be simultaneously in two states (on and off), the flask with poison is open and closed, and the cat is both dead and alive at the same time.

But the weirdness doesn't end there: as soon as the box is opened to observe the state of the cat, this situation changes. The act of measurement forces the animal to be either dead or alive. This is called the quantum mechanical measurement back-action: the state (of the particle as well as the imaginary cat) is inevitably perturbed by the measurement and collapses to a classical state. In this work, the scientists investigated what happens when the box is only slightly opened. Is it possible to peek at the cat, without destroying the fragile quantum state?

Peeking at Schrödinger's cat

Schrödinger’s cat in a box, being both dead and alive at the same time. When the box is opened completely, the state of the cat will be either dead or alive. By slightly lifting the lid, it is possible to acquire only a little bit of information, while maintaining the fragile quantum state. In this experiment, the nucleus plays the role of the cat. Credit: Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM)

Instead of a cat, the scientists in the group of FOM workgroup leader Ronald Hanson used a nucleus in diamond. These particles carry an intrinsic property called spin that behaves like a small magnet. The spin of the nucleus can point up (cat alive) or down (cat dead).

In earlier work the group showed that it is possible to measure the orientation of a single spin, in analogy to fully opening Schrödinger's box. To partially open the box, the scientists used a trick. Instead of directly measuring the nucleus, they first coupled the state of the nucleus to a nearby electron. They then determined the state of the electron.

By varying the strength of the coupling between the nucleus and the electron, the scientists could carefully tune the measurement strength. A weaker measurement reveals less information, but also has less back-action. An analysis of the nuclear spin after such a weak measurement showed that the nuclear spin remained in a (slightly altered) superposition of two states. In this way, the scientists verified that the change of the state (induced by the back-action) precisely matched the amount of information that was gained by the measurement.

Steering by peeking

The scientists realised that it is possible to steer the by applying sequential measurements with varying measurement strength. Since the outcome of a measurement is not known in advance, the researchers implemented a feedback loop in the experiment. They chose the strength of the second measurement depending on the outcome of the first measurement. In this way the scientists could steer the nucleus towards a desired superposition state by only looking at it.

This result provides new insight in the role of measurements in . Furthermore the combination of measurements and feedback, as demonstrated here, form an essential building block for the future quantum computer. Finally, these techniques can increase the sensitivity of .

Explore further: Peeking into Schrodinger's box: Direct measurement shows potential for quantum information

More information: Manipulating a qubit through the backaction of sequential partial measurements and real-time feedback, M.S. Blok, C. Bonato, M.L. Markham, D.J. Twitchen, V.V. Dobrovitski, R. Hanson, Nature Physics. DOI: 10.1038/nphys2881

Related Stories

No qualms about quantum theory

November 26, 2013

A colloquium paper published in European Physical Journal D looks into the alleged issues associated with quantum theory. Berthold-Georg Englert from the National University of Singapore reviews a selection of the potential ...

Playing quantum tricks with measurements

February 15, 2013

A team of physicists at the University of Innsbruck, Austria, performed an experiment that seems to contradict the foundations of quantum theory—at first glance. The team led by Rainer Blatt reversed a quantum measurement ...

Physicists correct quantum errors

February 3, 2014

Scientists from the FOM Foundation and the Technical University Delft, working together at the Kavli Institute of Nanoscience, have succeeded in detecting and correcting errors during the storage of quantum states in a diamond. ...

Recommended for you

Hauling antiprotons around in a van

February 22, 2018

A team of researchers working on the antiProton Unstable Matter Annihilation (PUMA) project near CERN's particle laboratory, according to a report in Nature, plans to capture a billion antiprotons, put them in a shipping ...

Urban heat island effects depend on a city's layout

February 22, 2018

The arrangement of a city's streets and buildings plays a crucial role in the local urban heat island effect, which causes cities to be hotter than their surroundings, researchers have found. The new finding could provide ...

New quantum memory stores information for hours

February 22, 2018

Storing information in a quantum memory system is a difficult challenge, as the data is usually quickly lost. At TU Wien, ultra-long storage times have now been achieved using tiny diamonds.


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Feb 17, 2014
An interesting concept obscured by references to the 'measurement' and that darn cat in the box.
That a quantum object can be steered by interaction with another quantum object without decoherence or any non-quantum (classical) interactions is the real result here.
If we can understand and analyse this effect as wave-functions interacting we would be much closer to understanding the nature of space and time and the wave-particles space defines the laws of physics for.
not rated yet Feb 18, 2014
Quite. One can't 'slightly opened' a box anyway. Since the box is seen and measured it must be a box in the classical sense and therefore either open or shut. Once the outside is allowed to enter or the contents to come out the box is open and the degree is irrelevant. Bad analogy
As for the experiment itself wouldn't steering the spin be imposing a state which the observer wants thus turning the system into a kind of 'semiclassical' one? Just a thought.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.