New fossils push the origin of flowering plants back by 100 million years to the early Triassic

New fossils push the origin of flowering plants back by 100 million years to the early Triassic
This image shows flower-like pollen from the Triassic. Credit: UZH

Drilling cores from Switzerland have revealed the oldest known fossils of direct ancestors of flowering plants. These beautifully preserved 240-million-year-old pollen grains are evidence that flowering plants evolved 100 million years earlier than previously thought, according to researchers from the University of Zurich.

Flowering plants evolved from extinct plants related to conifers, ginkgos, cycads, and seed ferns. The oldest known fossils from flowering plants are grains. These are small, robust and numerous and therefore fossilize more easily than leaves and flowers.

An uninterrupted sequence of fossilized pollen from flowers begins in the Early Cretaceous, approximately 140 million years ago, and it is generally assumed that flowering plants first evolved around that time. But the present study documents flowering plant-like pollen that is 100 million years older, implying that flowering plants may have originated in the Early Triassic (between 252 to 247 million years ago) or even earlier.

Many studies have tried to estimate the age of flowering plants from molecular data, but so far no consensus has been reached. Depending on dataset and method, these estimates range from the Triassic to the Cretaceous. Molecular estimates typically need to be "anchored" in fossil evidence, but extremely old fossils were not available for flowering plants. "That is why the present finding of flower-like pollen from the Triassic is significant", says Prof. Peter Hochuli, University of Zurich.

New fossils push the origin of flowering plants back by 100 million years to the early Triassic
This is an image of pollen. Credit: Peter A. Hochuli1. P, A and Feist-Burkhardt. S, Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013.

Peter Hochuli and Susanne Feist-Burkhardt from Paleontological Institute and Museum, University of Zürich, studied two drilling cores from Weiach and Leuggern, northern Switzerland, and found pollen grains that resemble fossil pollen from the earliest known flowering plants. With Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy, they obtained high-resolution images across three dimensions of six different types of pollen.

In a previous study from 2004, Hochuli and Feist-Burkhardt documented different, but clearly related flowering-plant-like pollen from the Middle Triassic in cores from the Barents Sea, south of Spitsbergen. The samples from the present study were found 3000 km south of the previous site. "We believe that even highly cautious scientists will now be convinced that flowering plants evolved long before the Cretaceous", say Hochuli.

What might these primitive have looked like? In the Middle Triassic, both the Barents Sea and Switzerland lay in the subtropics, but the area of Switzerland was much drier than the region of the Barents Sea. This implies that these plants occurred a broad ecological range. The pollen's structure suggests that the were pollinated by insects: most likely beetles, as bees would not evolve for another 100 million years.

Explore further

Secret life of bees now a little less secret

More information: Peter A. Hochuli and Susanne Feist-Burkhardt. Angiosperm-like pollen and Afropollis from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of the Germanic Basin (Northern Switzerland). Frontiers in Plant Science. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00344
Citation: New fossils push the origin of flowering plants back by 100 million years to the early Triassic (2013, October 1) retrieved 19 June 2019 from
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Feedback to editors

User comments

Oct 02, 2013
I guess we don't need the honeybees after all. But, is plant life still nutrient-dependent in the context of nutrient-dependent chemically-controlled or pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution in honeybees? i get the impression that the change of 100 million years means the conserved molecular mechanisms are not conserved from plants to animals because this also suggests that it may have taken hundreds of millions of years longer for the pollinating beetles to evolve.

It's all so confusing once you're told to step away from the evolutionary continuum and believe in mutation-driven evolution, instead. Isn't it? I was already having problems with the 90 million year gap in the Cambrian explosion's diversification of cichlid fish. Now this. Surely, someone has discovered new molecular mechanisms and is not telling us about their role in adaptive evolution. Please find out who they are and force them to tell the physiologists about cause and effect across species and kingdoms.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more