A surprising new function for small RNAs in evolution

A surprising new function for small RNAs in evolution

An international research team in including Christian Schlötterer and Alistair McGregor of the Vetmeduni Vienna has discovered a completely new mechanism by which evolution can change the appearance of an organism. The researchers found that the number of hairs on flies' legs varies according to the level of activity of a so-called microRNA. The results, published in the journal Current Biology, shed a completely new light on the molecular mechanisms of evolution.

It has long been known that certain proteins, known as transcription factors, directly control the way in which information is read from DNA. As a result, it is widely believed that changes in genes encoding such proteins underlie the mechanisms responsible for . The idea that small , so-called microRNAs, may play an important part in evolutionary changes to animals' appearance is completely new. An international team of researchers, including Christian Schlötterer and Alistair McGregor from the Institute of of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna (Vetmeduni Vienna), has now published a study that describes such an evolutionary mechanism.

Small and large bald patches

Insect bodies are generally covered with a large number of . This is the case for the legs of many closely related species of the fruit fly genus Drosophila, although the animals have a bald patch on the second pair of legs, intriguingly known as the naked valley. Previous work had shown that the size of this patch is regulated by the gene ultrabithorax (Ubx) and that it differs between species. However, the work at the Vetmeduni Vienna showed that similar differences are shown by individuals from different populations of .

Their search for the genetic basis of the variation led the researchers to a segment of fruit fly DNA that contained four genes. Three of these genes were known to encode proteins with no role in the development of the hairs. The fourth gene, known as miR-92a, encodes a microRNA. Previous experiments had shown that an increase in activity of the miR-92a gene was associated with a loss of hairs from the animals' wings. By overexpressing the gene in the legs of the fruit flies, the scientists were able to cause hair loss on the animals' legs.

Schlötterer is naturally excited by the findings. "This is the first experiment to show that natural variation in the expression of a microRNA can lead to a change in the appearance of an organism. MicroRNAs can fine-tune the level at which genes are expressed, so evolutionary changes in the production of microRNA would be an elegant way to cause morphological changes."


Explore further

Many a mickle makes a muckle: How changes in animals' size and shape arise

More information: Arif, S. et al. Evolution of mir-92a Underlies Natural Morphological Variation in Drosophila melanogaster, Current Biology, (23(6), pp.523-528). dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.018
Journal information: Current Biology

Citation: A surprising new function for small RNAs in evolution (2013, April 19) retrieved 18 September 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2013-04-function-small-rnas-evolution.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.
0 shares

Feedback to editors

User comments

Apr 20, 2013
" The idea that small RNA molecules, so-called microRNAs, may play an important part in evolutionary changes to animals' appearance is completely new."

This idea is not new at all... The novelty here is the demonstration that such process actually happens in nature.

Apr 20, 2013
You're absolutely right - which is why you've been downvoted with "open" voting troll, who just replaced the already banned "lite" account. For what the voting system actually is, if it can be abused with single person so easily? The voting system just supports the dumb people, who are using to express their "opinion" instead of "arguments" and it promotes the subjective character of the discussions here. The people should have the option to inhibit the mass downvoters in their activity and they should be apple to apply censorship of posts based on their actual personal preferences, not on the preferences of anonymous voting bots.

Apr 20, 2013
@KAT: References please. I doubt Schlötterer would be excited if it wasn't a key finding. Conversely, if it has been demonstrated in the lab, why the excitement?

@ValeriaT: If I have to choose between anonymous voting bots and anonymous "aether" bots, I readily choose the former. They at least have the sense to not spout what we have known for centuries are inanities.

The comment system, which as opposed to many science sites allow "personal theories" (crackpot ideas) just supports the dumb people, who are using to express their "opinion" instead of actual referenced and researched arguments and it promotes the subjective character of the discussions here.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more