In perceiving climate change, feeling the heat counts

January 24, 2013 by Eric Gershon
Credit: Shutterstock

(—Human beings around the world are observing and accurately detecting changes in their local climates, according to a new study led by Yale University researchers. The finding provides the first global evidence for the phenomenon and could have meaningful implications for attempts to combat climate change, they said.

"We wanted to see if people have accurately detected the signal of a through their own local experience," said Peter D. Howe, a postdoctoral associate at Yale and lead author of the study. "We found that many have noticed local changes, which may influence public responses to in coming years."

Published in Nature Climate Change, the study is based on Gallup World Poll surveys of about 91,000 individuals in 89 countries on five continents.

They were asked: "Over the past five years, would you say that the average annual temperatures in your local area have gotten warmer, colder, or stayed about the same?" Researchers at Yale, Columbia, and Princeton Universities then matched responses to the survey with data on ' local .

The researchers found that perceptions tended to match reality—people who reported that their local area was getting warmer were indeed experiencing temperatures over the previous 6 to 12 months that were relatively higher, on average, than those experienced by people who reported that their local area was getting colder or had stayed the same.

The study also found that respondents' perceptions were influenced by recent weather. If surveyed during the local warm season, people were 11 to 19 percent more likely to believe that local temperatures were rising over the long term than they were when questioned during a cool period.

Even after controlling for geographic, demographic, and seasonal effects, however, the study found that an increase of 1 degree Celsius above the long-term local average was associated with a 7 to 12 percent increase in the likelihood that people would report that their was getting warmer.

The paper appeared in Nature Climate Change in December. The Gallup World Poll was conducted in 2007 and 2008.

Researchers said they could not definitively show a causal relationship between local climatic conditions experienced by respondents and their perceptions. But they concluded that "the logical direction of the effect of changes in temperature on , and the lack of an alternative variable that would predict both actual and perceived temperature change suggests that changes in temperature are a causal influence on perceptions."

Explore further: Climate change hits home

Related Stories

Climate change hits home

March 20, 2011

Direct experience of extreme weather events increases concern about climate change and willingness to engage in energy-saving behaviour, according to a new research paper published in the first edition of the journal Nature ...

Recommended for you

The dust storm microbiome

June 27, 2017

Israel is subjected to sand and dust storms from several directions: northeast from the Sahara, northwest from Saudi Arabia and southwest from the desert regions of Syria. The airborne dust carried in these storms affects ...

Collapse of the European ice sheet caused chaos

June 27, 2017

Scientists have reconstructed in detail the collapse of the Eurasian ice sheet at the end of the last ice age. The big melt wreaked havoc across the European continent, driving home the original Brexit 10,000 years ago.

Lightning sparking more boreal forest fires

June 27, 2017

A new NASA-funded study finds that lightning storms were the main driver of recent massive fire years in Alaska and northern Canada, and that these storms are likely to move farther north with climate warming, potentially ...

Greenland now a major driver of rising seas: study

June 26, 2017

Ocean levels rose 50 percent faster in 2014 than in 1993, with meltwater from the Greenland ice sheet now supplying 25 percent of total sea level increase compared with just five percent 20 years earlier, researchers reported ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1.6 / 5 (8) Jan 24, 2013
How close to the point of no return will science take us before they admit a climate crisis WILL happen, not just might happen. Science must be clear about the worst possible crisis imaginable; a climate crisis. You can't have a little climate crisis.
Science only agrees it is real, not a real crisis as none of the IPCC warnings say it "will" happen, only "might" happen and "could" happen and "probably" happen. Media and politicians only say climate change crisis WILL happen as science has never said it WILL happen, only might happen.
Find me one single IPCC warning without "could be" and "likely" and ………..maybe!
3.3 / 5 (7) Jan 24, 2013
Because in science, the only way you make a definitive claim such as you ask is if there is a 100% probability, in other other possible outcome. The number of variables connected to the climate system make this impossible.
5 / 5 (1) Jan 28, 2013

No, that is the wrong analogy. It's more like; Your house is on fire, but we don't know what the MAX temperature will be!

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.