Printing off the paper: Pushing the boundaries of the burgeoning technology of 3-D printing

September 14, 2011 by David L. Chandler
One of the 3-D printers at work in the Mediated Matter group at the MIT Media Lab. Photo: Melanie Gonick

Imagine being able to "print" an entire house. Or a four-course dinner. Or a complete mechanical device such as a cuckoo clock, fully assembled and ready to run. Or a printer capable of printing ... yet another printer?

These are no longer sci-fi flights of fancy. Rather, they are all real (though very early-stage) research projects underway at MIT, and just a few ways the Institute is pushing forward the boundaries of a technology it helped pioneer nearly two decades ago. A flurry of media stories this year have touted three-dimensional printing — or “3DP” — as the vanguard of a revolution in the way goods are produced, one that could potentially usher in a new era of “mass customization.”

One of the first practical 3-D printers, and the first to be called by that name, was patented in 1993 by MIT professors Michael Cima, now the Sumitomo Electric Industries Professor of Engineering, and Emanuel Sachs, now the Fred Fort Flowers (1941) and Daniel Fort Flowers (1941) Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Unlike earlier attempts, this machine has evolved to create objects made of plastic, ceramic and metal. The MIT-inspired 3DPs are now in use “all over the world,” Cima says.

The initial motivation was to produce models for visualization — for architects and others — and help streamline the development of new products, such as medical devices. Cima explains, “The slow step in product development was prototyping. We wanted to be able to rapidly prototype surgical tools, and get them into surgeons’ hands to get feedback.”

3DP technology involves building up a shape gradually, one thin layer at a time. The device uses a “stage” — a metal platform mounted on a piston — that’s raised or lowered by a tiny increment at a time. A layer of powder is spread across this platform, and then a print head similar to those used in inkjet printers deposits a binder liquid onto the powder, binding it together. Then, the platform is lowered infinitesimally, another thin layer of powder is applied on top of the last, and the next layer of binder is deposited.

Made to order

With its layers of powder, such a system can make complex shapes that earlier liquid-based 3DP systems could not produce. And different combinations of powders and binders could make a variety of materials — “anything you can make from powders: ceramics, metals, plastics,” Cima says — or even a mix of different materials in the same printed object, using different liquids in the print heads, like the different colors of ink in an inkjet printer.

In one early version, the powder was aluminum oxide, the binder was colloidal silica, and the resulting solid objects were brittle, similar to materials sometimes used as molds for metal casting. They provided, for the first time, a relatively simple way to get one’s hands on a three-dimensional version of just about any shape that could be sketched by computer-assisted design (CAD) software, before manufacturers committed to mass production at much greater cost.

The video will load shortly

Steven Keating and Neri Oxman demonstrate how 3-D printing works Video: Melanie Gonick

Over the years, the three MIT researchers and one of the companies that licensed the MIT patent, Z Corp., added new variations, including the ability to include colors in printed objects and to use a variety of materials. The ability to print metal objects, in particular, extended the technology from just a way of visualizing new designs to a means of manufacturing metal molds used for the injection molding of plastic parts.

Samuel Allen SM ’71, PhD ’75, the POSCO Professor of Physical Metallurgy and chair of the MIT faculty, spent a decade developing the metal-printing process. In producing molds for injection molding, he says, “the plastic shapes can be quite complicated, with round surfaces and thin walls.” In addition to the shapes of the finished parts, the molds need to have channels for the plastic material to be injected, and they have to be designed so that the resulting pieces can cool uniformly without warping. The 3DP process made it possible to make “parts you could not make through conventional machining,” Allen says.

Manufacturing companies took a strong interest in this work because it enabled “doing a complete design for a tool in days, rather than months,” he adds. “That means you can afford to go through more design iterations.”

Time for a snack

3DP has since branched out in a wide array of directions, at various companies and research institutions around the world. Applications have included everything from the printing of customized prosthetic limbs to nanoprinting of tiny machinery to a project at the MIT Media Lab developing machines to print food ranging from candies to complete meals. One former Media Lab student, Peter Schmitt PhD ’11, working with Media Lab IP consultant Bob Swartz, has printed entire working clocks — with all their gears, chains, faces and hands in a single unit — ready to start ticking as soon as the surplus powder is washed away.

“Mass production is only a couple of hundred years old,” Swartz says. Now, “we’re moving into an area where things will no longer be mass produced.” With 3DP, a basic pattern can be modified to fit an individual’s size, fit and personal tastes before printing.

These clocks were primarily intended to demonstrate that complex devices could be printed as a unit — but one clock took about 100 hours of printing time to produce. “That’s completely impractical for any kind of mass production,” Swartz says, “but it’s my belief that one can get orders-of-magnitude improvements” in the production speed. “It changes the way we think about production.”

Printing better materials

Another variant underway now is a system being developed by Neri Oxman PhD ’10, the Media Lab’s Sony Corporation Career Development Assistant Professor of Media Arts and Sciences, and her graduate student Steven Keating for “printing” concrete. Their ultimate aim: printing a complete structure, even a whole building.

Why do that, instead of the tried-and-true method of casting concrete in wooden forms that dates from the heyday of the Roman Empire? In part, Oxman explains, because it opens up new possibilities in both form and function. Not only would it be possible to create fanciful, organic-looking shapes that would be difficult or impossible using molds, but the technique could also allow the properties of the concrete itself to vary continuously, producing structures that are both lighter and stronger than conventional concrete.

To illustrate this, Keating uses the example of a palm tree compared to a typical structural column. In a concrete column, the properties of the material are constant, resulting in a very heavy structure. But a palm tree’s trunk varies: denser at the outside and lighter toward the center. As part of his thesis research, he has already made sections of concrete with the same kind of variations of density.

“Nature always uses graded materials,” Keating says. Bone, for example, consists of “a hard, dense outer shell, and an interior of spongy material. It gives you a high strength-to-weight ratio. You don’t see that in man-made materials.” Not yet, at least.

Concrete samples made by hand to illustrate the concept of density gradient in concrete. A team from the MIT Media Lab hopes to be able to print such materials with a 3-D printer.Photo: Steven Keating, Timothy Cooke and John Fernández

Variable-density printing is not just about large-scale objects. For example, Oxman has used a similar system to produce a glove with sections that are stiff and others that are flexible, designed to help prevent the wearer from developing carpal tunnel syndrome. She has also designed a chair made of different polymers, producing stiff areas for structural support and flexible areas for comfort, all printed out as a single unit.

Peter Schmitt, now a visiting scientist at the Media Lab, is pushing the technology in an even more sci-fi direction, trying to “build machines that could build machines,” he says. So far, he’s succeeded in making machines that can make many of the parts for another machine, but there remain many obstacles in establishing connections among these — and it’s still more of an intellectual exercise than a practical system, he concedes. “There are better ways to make the parts,” he says. “But at some point, these kinds of things will happen.”

This story is republished courtesy of MIT News (, a popular site that covers news about MIT research, innovation and teaching.

Explore further: How to grow nanowires and tiny plates

Related Stories

How to grow nanowires and tiny plates

July 14, 2011

Researchers at MIT have found a way to control precisely the shapes of submicroscopic wires deposited from a solution — using a method that makes it possible to produce entire electronic devices through a liquid-based ...

Hot off the press: Nanoscale Gutenberg-style printing

April 15, 2011

( -- When Gutenberg developed the principles of modern book printing, books became available to the masses. Hoping to bring technology capable of mass production to the nanometer scale, Udo Bach and this team ...

While you're up, print me a solar cell (w/ video)

July 11, 2011

The sheet of paper looks like any other document that might have just come spitting out of an office printer, with an array of colored rectangles printed over much of its surface. But then a researcher picks it up, clips ...

The kids are alright

May 26, 2011

Children should be seen and not heard... who says? A Philosophy academic at The University of Nottingham is challenging the adage by teaching primary school children to argue properly.

Recommended for you

Ringing the changes: Dutch bike lock blocks rider's phone

June 21, 2017

A telecom company in the Netherlands has teamed up with the country's traffic safety authority to develop a bicycle lock that also blocks its mobile network, in a move aimed at protecting young riders who regularly pedal ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (1) Sep 14, 2011
This is an exciting field, being able to print varying materials. A more reasonable speed is still one of the key enablers yet to be tackled for most of the practical applications. Given the example of a palm tree instead of just a column, why not a mass produced filler core with a customized structural exterior "printed" over? Why not use the printer as the "glue" to assemble a final form, such as the leaves, to the trunk.
That also begs the question, what range of material properties can be achieved?
1 / 5 (1) Sep 14, 2011
Neri Oxman is a glossy chick

not rated yet Sep 14, 2011
Mate rawa1,
This is a most exciting development!
I do believe it would be extremely worthwhile looking deeper into this.
not rated yet Sep 14, 2011
I feel like this tech is a stepping stone towards nanotech manufactoring. They are definely on the right track by trying to create new "Creators", as in making machines that can make other machines in new ways. They should definitely try to make this work with Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene and other wonder materials to get the best of both worlds. Exciting stuff!
not rated yet Sep 14, 2011
See papercrete (concrete paper fibers) as a neat building material http://en.wikiped...ercrete. 3D printing could also be used to vary the property of materials by combining varying mixtures of 2 or more materials together.
not rated yet Sep 14, 2011
Consider the point of the humans that 'used' to make goods.
These machines could replace those humans. What next? For China, that would include the 'other' 800 million Chinese. Spooky.
not rated yet Sep 15, 2011
I wonder about that too. It seems with Technology we are making ourselves obsolete, as in, how will we all have jobs if machines allow fewer workers to do more? What happens when technology makes whole companies run off one persons neural interface?
5 / 5 (1) Sep 15, 2011
They are definely on the right track by trying to create new "Creators", as in making machines that can make other machines in new ways.

Though this is definiteky an exciting technology we have to put this into perspective. The current batch of home 3D printers (Fab@Home, RepRap, etc. ) can reproduce a lot of the parts (by volume and weight) that the printer si made of - but the really interesting parts which make up the core of what a 3D printer actually is (microcontrollers, printer heads, sensors, motors, flexible parts) are still a ways beyond what 3D printers can fabricate.

It's a bit like giving birth to a child that has no brain and no internal organs. Does it look like a human? Yes. Does it qualify as a human in any way? No.

how will we all have jobs

Will we need to have jobs when everything can be produced for free?
not rated yet Sep 15, 2011
Will we need to have jobs when everything can be produced for free?

I guess not, but how does an economy like that work? It seems that Economics is one of Mankind's greatest challenges. Any major changes threaten to distabilize the whole system, slowing technological progress and keeping us tethered to old systems in the name of stability.
5 / 5 (2) Sep 15, 2011
I guess not, but how does an economy like that work?

It doesn't - because then you have no economy. Economy is when have a supply and a demand and both are limited by some factors. Take away that limitation by having a supply equal to the demand without any limiting resource issues through 3D printing and some very basic access to raw materials and then there's nothing for an economy to work on. It's the end of the barter system. (Though there are still some centralized services for which another system must be found: healthcare, infrastructure, ... basically anything that can't really be distributed on a per person/household basis)

I'm not sure whether this would slow down resaerch or technological processes (rather I'd think it would speed it up because there are people who love to do science, who love to develop stuff - and they would no longer be encumbered by limited funds or patent lawyers.) It would also weed out all those "just in it for the money"-types.
5 / 5 (1) Sep 20, 2011
I think there's a certain person with a penchant for German culture that might have an opinion on this whole no jobs thing....

Eventually..............eventually, there might be nothing left that we NEED to do. How well we transition to that stage will be what matters. Will enough people have the patience to let it evolve in a way that hurts few people, or will greed continue to motivate the exploitation of the people that are being left behind?

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.