Physicists first to observe rare particles produced at the Large Hadron Collider

March 28, 2011

Shortly after experiments on the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the CERN laboratory near Geneva, Switzerland began yielding scientific data last fall, a group of scientists led by a Syracuse University physicist became the first to observe the decays of a rare particle that was present right after the Big Bang. By studying this particle, scientists hope to solve the mystery of why the universe evolved with more matter than antimatter.

Led by Sheldon Stone, a physicist in SU's College of Arts and Sciences, the scientists observed the decay of a special type of B meson, which are created when protons traveling at nearly the speed of light smash into each other. The work is part of two studies published in the March 28 issue of Physics Letters B. Stone leads SU's high-energy physics group, which is part of a larger group of scientists (the LHCb collaboration) that run an experiment at CERN. The National Science Foundation funds Stone's research group.

"It is impressive to see such a forefront physics result produced so soon after data-taking commenced at the LHC," said Moishe Pripstein, program director for the NSF's Elementary Particle Physics program. "These results are a tribute both to the ingenuity of the international collaboration of scientists and the discovery potential of the LHC."

Scientists are eager to study these special B mesons because of their potential for yielding information about the relationship between matter and antimatter moments after the Big Bang, as well as yet-to-be described forces that resulted in the rise of matter over antimatter.

"We know when the universe formed from the Big Bang, it had just as much matter as antimatter," Stone says. "But we live in a world predominantly made of matter, therefore, there had to be differences in the decaying of both matter and antimatter in order to end up with a surplus of matter."

All matter is composed of atoms, which are composed of protons (positive charge), electrons (negative charge) and neutrons (neutral). The protons and neutrons are composed, in turn, of even smaller particles called quarks. Antimatter is composed of antiprotons, positrons (the opposite of electrons), antineutrons, and thus anti-quarks. While antimatter generally refers to sub-atomic particles, it can also include larger elements, such as hydrogen or helium. It is generally believed that the same rules of physics should apply to both matter and antimatter and that both should occur in equal amounts in the universe. That they don't play by the same rules or occur in equal amounts are among the greatest unsolved problems in physics today.

B mesons are a rare and special subgroup of mesons composed of a quark and anti-quark. While B mesons were common after the Big Bang, they are not believed to occur in nature today and can only be created and observed under experimental conditions in the LHC or other high-energy colliders. Because these particles don't play by the same rules of physics as most other matter, scientists believe B mesons may have played an important role in the rise of matter over antimatter. The particles may also provide clues about the nature of the forces that led to this lack of symmetry in the universe.

"We want to figure out the nature of the forces that influence the decay of these [B meson] particles," Stone says. "These forces exist, but we just don't know what they are. It could help explain why decays differently than ."

In 2009, SU's experimental high-energy physics group received more than $3.5 million from the NSF through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) for its research as part of the LHCb collaboration at CERN. The LHCb, one of four large particle detectors located in the ring, is dedicated to searching for new types of fundamental forces in nature.

Explore further: Physicists testing Nobel-winning theory

Related Stories

Physicists testing Nobel-winning theory

November 13, 2008

( -- Soeren Prell and a team of Iowa State University researchers are part of an international research team testing a theory that led to a share of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physics for Japanese researchers Makoto ...

New Experiments Will Shed Light On Matter And Antimatter

July 22, 2004

If the laws of physics were precisely the same for matter and antimatter, you wouldn't be reading this. All matter, as we know it, would have been converted into light after the Big Bang. To explore the fundamental differences ...

Strange Antihyperparticle Created

March 30, 2010

( -- Physicists, including nine from UC Davis, working at the U.S. Department of Energy's Brookhaven National Laboratory recently created some strange matter not seen since just after the Big Bang -- an "antihypertriton" ...

Recommended for you

Destabilized solitons perform a disappearing act

February 27, 2017

When your heart beats, blood courses through your veins in waves of pressure. These pressure waves manifest as your pulse, a regular rhythm unperturbed by the complex internal structure of the body. Scientists call such robust ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3.8 / 5 (5) Mar 28, 2011
Dear Editor, This article is devoid of any factual original content. Please rectify.
Statement "B mesons are a rare and special subgroup of mesons composed of a quark and anti-quark."
Special? because they include a B quark, outside the regular u/d family
Rare? - similarly, they are unstable and need accelerators or cosmic stuff to make them.
All mesons are a quark/antiquark pair - these are special versions of that formula, not rare incidences of it.
Heavy weekend was it?
1 / 5 (2) Mar 29, 2011
''yet-to-be described forces that resulted in the rise of matter over antimatter.''

^^^ Seems obvious the reason should be from matter collecting and anti being eaten by BH more often.
not rated yet Mar 30, 2011
"B mesons are a rare and special subgroup of mesons composed of a quark and anti-quark. While B mesons were common after the Big Bang, they are not believed to occur in nature today and can only be created and observed under experimental conditions in the LHC or other high-energy colliders."

Perhaps what you mean to say is that they are not observable outside the LHC and in the cosmos with all the background noise and relatively insignificant detectors we have to detect them; might need an instrument the size of the moon. The assumption is that all matter in the universe is older such that they don't exist. If we can create them, then they exist in the cosmos lmao. To hear God's laughter at that arrogance. I mean don't you think somewhere in the universe that theres a bunch of subatomic particles colliding at the speed of light...isn't the universe and cosmos all about collision....and encompassing all forms of matter and anti-matter? lol
not rated yet Mar 30, 2011
PS3, there isn't enough matter in the form of black holes to account for anything like all the apparently disappearing anti-matter. Black holes would have to dominate over baryonic matter for your hypothesis to be correct.
1 / 5 (1) Mar 30, 2011
Maybe the anti interacts different with BH and doesn't add mass to it but just gets eaten to disappear.
not rated yet Apr 01, 2011
My own version of cosmology includes the issue of asymmetry in the laws of physics. It is described in the following thread: http://www.physor...ans.html

Yes, I know it's a surprising place to put cosmology, but someone had a cosmological explanation for bonobos that I thought should not go unchallenged!
Basically, this universe isn't so much "THE BIG bang", but a dirty little second-hand bang, with lop-sided lawas as a result!
not rated yet Apr 01, 2011
I think there is now some actual evidence for quarks, at least for the proton being composed of more than one charged particle:
I aplogize for linking an article that requires logging on, but the reduced diameter of a proton when it has captured a muon instead of an electron is quite exciting for high energy physics, IMO. The s-state atmoic orbitals penetrate the nucleus, so the muon form of hydrogen produces more penetration, hence more reduction of effective nuclear charge, and less internal repulsion.
not rated yet Apr 04, 2011
I suspect that a muon is larger than either a proton or the point-like electron, because otherwise the overlap integral with the proton would still be too small to give a 4% effect. As it happens, muons are a combination of a particular neutrino and an electron, so may be large.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.