Australia's consumer watchdog sues US games giant Valve

Fans play newly released Xbox One games at the Microsoft retail store at Tysons Corner Center on November 21, 2013 in McLean, Vi
People play video games at Tysons Corner Center on November 21, 2013 in McLean, Virginia

Australia's consumer watchdog Friday said it was taking online US video games giant Valve to court for allegedly making "false or misleading representations" and refusing to offer refunds.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said Valve Corporation, which operates digital video games distribution platform Steam for more than 65 million customers worldwide, allegedly breached local consumer law.

"Valve may be an American-based company with no physical presence in Australia, but it is carrying on business in Australia by selling to Australian consumers, who are protected by the Australian consumer law," the ACCC said in a statement.

"The consumer guarantees provided under the Australian consumer law cannot be excluded, restricted or modified."

Under Australian law, consumers can insist on a refund or replacement if a product has a major fault.

ACCC said Valve made false or misleading representations to Australian customers of Steam, such as saying that were not entitled to a refund, and that its games were not subject to statutory consumer guarantees.

Valve spokesman Doug Lombardi told Fairfax Media his firm, which has the lion's share of the digital distribution market, was "making every effort to cooperate with the Australian officials on this matter".

The first court hearing will be in Sydney on October 7.

© 2014 AFP

Citation: Australia's consumer watchdog sues US games giant Valve (2014, August 29) retrieved 4 December 2024 from https://phys.org/news/2014-08-australia-consumer-watchdog-sues-games.html
This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.

Explore further

The 'free to roam' case: Why perceptions matter for misleading claims by business

0 shares

Feedback to editors