Patent suits filed against Facebook, Apple, Google

Aug 27, 2010
Combo of two pictures show the logo for Microsoft at their office in Herndon, Virginia, and the entrance of Yahoo headquarters in Sunnyvale, California. A company owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen on Friday blasted Apple, Facebook, Google, YouTube, Yahoo! and others with a patent infringement lawsuit filed in a US court.

A company owned by Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen on Friday blasted Apple, Facebook, Google, YouTube, Yahoo! and others with a patent infringement lawsuit filed in a US court.

Seattle-based Interval Licensing, an Allen company, accused 11 online commerce and Internet search firms with infringing patents on fundamental Web technologies Interval developed in the 1990s.

"Interval Research was an early, ground-breaking contributor to the development of the Internet economy," said Allen spokesman David Postman.

"This lawsuit is necessary to protect our investment in innovation."

Postman stressed that the technology at issue was created by Interval Research, a company founded by Allen and David Liddle in 1992, and not patents acquired from other firms.

The list of defendants in the lawsuit included AOL and Internet auction house as well as online movie rental firm and retail chains Office Depot, OfficeMax, and Staples.

"We believe this suit is completely without merit and we will fight it vigorously," said in response to an AFP inquiry.

also slammed the lawsuit.

"This lawsuit against some of America's most innovative companies reflects an unfortunate trend of people trying to compete in the courtroom instead of the marketplace," a Google spokesman told AFP.

"Innovation -- not litigation -- is the way to bring to market the kinds of products and services that benefit millions of people around the world."

Microsoft, which Allen founded with Bill Gates in 1975, was not named in the suit.

Patents at issue involved using Web browsers to find information; alerting computer users to items of interest, and an "Attention Manager for occupying the peripheral attention of a person in the vicinity of a display device."

Explore further: Google's corporate products division changes name

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Amazon, Apple, Google, Yahoo! targeted in patent case

Oct 06, 2009

A US technology company which won a patent case against software giant Microsoft filed suit on Tuesday against nearly two dozen other high-profile firms accusing them of violating the same patent.

Microsoft reaches licensing deal on HTC phones

Apr 28, 2010

(AP) -- Microsoft Corp. says it has patents covering phones that use Google Inc.'s Android software - but unlike Apple Inc., Microsoft has reached a licensing deal rather than suing over the software.

Google backs HTC in Apple patent suit

Mar 03, 2010

Google on Wednesday threw its backing behind HTC, maker of the Internet giant's Nexus One smartphone, after Apple accused the Taiwan company of infringing on iPhone patents.

Apple files 2nd countersuit against Creative

Jun 08, 2006

(AP) -- Apple Computer Inc. has filed a second countersuit against SIngapore-based Creative Technology Ltd., intensifying its legal battle against the smaller media player rival that sued the iPod maker for ...

Recommended for you

Netflix unveils new way to share recommendations

15 hours ago

Netflix is giving its Internet video subscribers a more discreet way to recommend movies and TV shows to their Facebook friends after realizing most people don't want to share their viewing habits with large ...

Job listing service ZipRecruiter raises $63 million

Sep 01, 2014

ZipRecruiter, a California start-up that tries to simplify tasks for recruiters, has raised $63 million in initial venture capital funding as the 4-year-old service races to keep up with growing demand.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

DaveGee
3 / 5 (2) Aug 27, 2010
Paul Allen from co-founder of Microsoft to ugly patent troll... My how the mighty have fallen! It's also interesting that Microsoft and Amazon are missing from the list of defendants. Seeing how Amazon is the KING of 'you might also like' its really quite curious.
kuro
4.3 / 5 (3) Aug 27, 2010
TFA is sorely missing information on what exactly is the matter of the litigation.

Apparently, they are suing over display of "related" content in thumbnails next to the main content. WSJ's piece is better.

http://online.wsj...382.html
Husky
not rated yet Aug 28, 2010
you also might like "patent troll"
MacAuley
not rated yet Aug 28, 2010
Paul Allen is parasite on society. He has added so little to innovation but uses the courts to rip off the true innovators. He's probably hoping that these companies will settle out-of-court, in order to make him go away.
Gena777
not rated yet Aug 31, 2010
There is one reason that the NPE ("patent troll") business model has become increasingly popular: it works. It is also legal, and often helps protect independent inventors and SMEs from exploitation of their intellectual property by larger, more powerful entities. Notably, it is almost invariably such multinational corporations that complain most about NPEs -- because, before the latter became so prevalent, greedy corporations could more often infringe SMEs' IP with impunity. Although abuse of the system should be condemned, most so-called trolls do nothing worse than Wall Street traders, for instance. Like it or not, NPEs are here to stay.
http://www.genera...nt-troll