The Multiplying Mystery of Moonwater

Mar 18, 2010 by Dauna Coulter
A Mini-SAR radar map of the lunar north pole. Craters circled in green are believed to contain significant deposits of frozen water.

Moonwater. Look it up. You won't find it. It's not in the dictionary.

That's because we thought, until recently, that the Moon was just about the driest place in the solar system. Then reports of moonwater started "pouring" in - starting with estimates of scant amounts on the , then gallons in a single crater, and now 600 million metric tons distributed among 40 craters near the lunar north pole.

"We thought we understood the Moon, but we don't," says Paul Spudis of the Lunar and Planetary Institute. "It's clear now that water exists up there in a variety of concentrations and geologic settings. And who'd have thought that today we'd be pondering the Moon's hydrosphere?"

Spudis is principal investigator of NASA's Mini-SAR team - the group with the latest and greatest moonwater "strike." Their instrument, a radar probe on India's Chandrayaan-1, found 40 craters each containing water at least 2 meters deep.

"If you converted those craters' water into rocket fuel, you'd have enough fuel to launch the equivalent of one per day for more than 2000 years. But our observations are just a part of an even more tantalizing story about what's going on up on the Moon."

It's the story of a lunar , and it's based on the seemingly disparate - but perhaps connectable - results from Mini-SAR and NASA's recent LCROSS mission and Moon Mineralogy Mapper (M3 or "M-cubed") instrument also on Chandrayaan-1.

"So far we've found three types of moonwater," says Spudis. "We have Mini-SAR's thick lenses of nearly pure crater ice, LCROSS's fluffy mix of ice crystals and dirt, and M-cube's thin layer that comes and goes all across the surface of the Moon."
On October 9, 2009, LCROSS, short for Observation and Sensing Satellite, struck water in a cold, permanently dark crater at the lunar south pole. Since then, the science team has been thoroughly mining their data.

"It looks as though at least two different layers of our crater soil contain water, and they represent two different time epochs," explains Anthony Colaprete, LCROSS principal investigator. "The first layer, ejected in the first 2 seconds from the crater after impact, contains water and hydroxyl bound up in the minerals, and even tiny pieces of pure ice mixed in. This layer is a thin film and may be relatively 'fresh,' perhaps recently replenished."

Shown in false-color blue, a thin layer of water-rich minerals cover an expanse of terrain around a young lunar crater. Credit: Chandrayaan-1/Moon Mineralogy Mapper.

According to Colaprete, this brand of moonwater resembles the moonwater M3 discovered last year in scant but widespread amounts, bound to the rocks and dust in the very top millimeters of lunar soil.

The second layer is different. "It contains even more water ice plus a treasure chest of other compounds we weren't even looking for," he says. "So far the tally includes sulfur dioxide (SO2), methanol (CH3OH), and the curious organic molecule diacetylene (H2C4). This layer seems to extend below at least 0.5 meters and is probably older than the ice we’re finding on the surface.”

They don't know why some craters contain loads of pure ice while others are dominated by an ice-soil mixture. It's probably a sign that the moonwater comes from more than one source.

"Some of the water may be made right there on the Moon," says Spudis. "Protons in the solar wind can make small amounts of water continuously on the lunar surface by interacting with metal oxides in the rocks. But some of the water is probably deposited on the Moon from other places in the solar system."

A plume of water-rich vapors billows up from crater Cabeus on Oct. 9, 2009, after LCROSS's Centaur booster hit the crater floor.

The Moon is constantly bombarded by impactors that add to the budget. Asteroids contain hydrated minerals, and comet cores are nearly pure ice.

The researchers also think that much of the crater water migrates to the poles from the Moon's warmer, lower latitudes. "All our findings are telling us there's an active water cycle on the ," marvels Colaprete.

Think about it. The "driest place in the solar system" has a water cycle.

"It's a different world up there," says Spudis, "and we've barely scratched the surface. Who knows what discoveries lie ahead?"

Moonwater. Add it to the dictionary.

Explore further: Student science projects explode with rocket

Source: Science@NASA, by Dauna Coulter

4.5 /5 (24 votes)

Related Stories

Radar Finds Ice Deposits at Moon's North Pole

Mar 02, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Using data from a NASA radar that flew aboard India's Chandrayaan-1 spacecraft, scientists have detected ice deposits near the moon's north pole. NASA's Mini-SAR instrument, a lightweight, ...

Microwaving Water from Moondust (w/ Video)

Oct 08, 2009

NASA is figuring out how to make water from moondust. Sounds like magic? "No magic--" says Ed Ethridge of NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center "-- just microwaves. We're showing how microwaves can extract water ...

Recommended for you

NASA image: Sunrise from the International Space Station

3 minutes ago

NASA astronaut Reid Wiseman posted this image of a sunrise, captured from the International Space Station, to social media on Oct. 29, 2014. Wiseman wrote, "Not every day is easy. Yesterday was a tough one. ...

Copernicus operations secured until 2021

26 minutes ago

In a landmark agreement for Europe's Copernicus programme, the European Commission and ESA have signed an Agreement of over €3 billion to manage and implement the Copernicus 'space component' between 2014 ...

Steering ESA satellites clear of space debris

33 minutes ago

Improved collision warnings for its Earth observation missions means ESA controllers can now take more efficient evasive action when satellites are threatened by space junk.

User comments : 23

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

EarthlingX
4.8 / 5 (4) Mar 18, 2010
Or use 'lunar water', it's easier to find it on wikipedia ;)
gwrede
2.4 / 5 (8) Mar 18, 2010
It used to be believed that... but now we know.

Have I heard it before, or what?

Whaddaya know, every /single/ generation keeps repeating that phrase. When I went to school it was KNOWN that Jupiter had 12 moons. That was The Truth, and God's Wrath upon the one heretic (me) who had the audacity to claim it is only a passing figure.
in7x
Mar 18, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.
Stellarparadox
5 / 5 (2) Mar 18, 2010
I remember when I was a kid, had a nice scope, the space race, getting to the moon. I think the planetary exploration that has gone on since the moon landing have been extraordinary. What we know now compared to back then is amazing. We probably can't conceive what is coming is certain fields.
yyz
not rated yet Mar 18, 2010
Finally, three types of moonwater for that "Moonriver".
gennoveus
not rated yet Mar 18, 2010
I'll have to agree with in7x's comment.

...

Or perhaps not. I've noticed a lot of articles here have puns in them. I've managed to refrain from scraping my eyes out so far but I'm not sure how much longer I can handle it.
verkle
1 / 5 (11) Mar 19, 2010
Can I propose another reason why moonwater may be there? Perhaps God placed it there when he made the Solar System.
Baseline
4.3 / 5 (7) Mar 19, 2010
Yes it certainly can not be excluded as a possibility, but then neither can it be ruled out at this time that a giant spaghetti monster put it there for us to find.

I can respect your beliefs however I would ask that your conclusions based on those beliefs have no place on a site based on the scientific method. Your beliefs can not be tested so they have no place in this discussion.

I will not come to your place of worship and challenge your beliefs by having the audacity to present evidence or facts so please don't come here with your untestable theory of everything.
probes
not rated yet Mar 19, 2010
Possibly, we could use this MoonWater as fuel. For a 200KW VASIMR engine.
DGBEACH
1 / 5 (1) Mar 19, 2010
What would happen to the moon's orbit if we were to start removing mass from it? This body, which has such an impact on our planet should NOT be touched in any way which could be to our detriment. There HAS to be another place to get water from out there without destroying ourselves!
AceLepage
5 / 5 (2) Mar 19, 2010
The moon is not a static body. Mass is constantly being added to it from the solar system, both from the Sun and from asteroid impacts. Removing mass (a small percentage of the whole) would balance the books, so to speak. Nothing catastrophic about it.
NotAsleep
not rated yet Mar 19, 2010
It would be nearly impossible for us to remove enough mass from the moon (or the earth) to change any orbits
Quantum_Conundrum
1 / 5 (1) Mar 19, 2010
Does he mean there is enough fuel to make 1 shuttle's earth launch per day for 2000 years, or enough to launch from the MOON for 2000 years? That's a pretty big difference. Launching from the moon is peanuts compared to launching from the earth...

Still, this is a lot more water than anyone has previously mentioned. This is enough water that with hybrid solar, nuclear, and chemical technologies they could sustain a colony's water, oxygen, and energy needs far easier than we have previously imagined, at least, given a suitable landing site.

Amazing really. Just a few years ago, and really even a few months ago, nobody was really suggesting that there might be frozen lakes or glaciers? on the moon.

What were those Apollo astronauts doing anyway? How could NASA be this incompetent that nobody bothered to check a few craters for frozen water?

Man, I know I won't be able to see it, but this makes me want to pull out my telescope and check out the moon some more. Water, who knew?
Quantum_Conundrum
1 / 5 (1) Mar 19, 2010
Ok, new manned mission, please, along with some "Spirit" and "Opportunity" style rovers.
jamesrm
not rated yet Mar 19, 2010
When will it be available in bottle form for my casual enjoyment here on earth?

Has "Moonwater" been trademarked yet?

Rgds
James
PieRSquare
not rated yet Mar 19, 2010
I'll start saying "Moonwater" after other people start saying "Earthwater"...

@probes: Did you lose a drinking bet which forces you to mention VASMIR in every single post you make? Don't get me wrong, I think it's a very promising technology but if you want to get to Mars in 3.9 seconds you don't need VASMIR, you need warp drive.

Sanescience
not rated yet Mar 19, 2010
Mars mission can suck it. We need a robotic "avatar" colony on the Moon that shares costs with the military for developing robotic "avatars" for the battle field.
GaryB
not rated yet Mar 19, 2010
I'll start saying "Moonwater" after other people start saying "Earthwater"


Earthwater. I like to swim in Earthwater.
nuge
not rated yet Mar 20, 2010
SO there could actually be a self-sustaining lunar colony in 30 years or so? Epic.
jonnie
not rated yet Mar 22, 2010
remember what they say, when you go on a trip, don not drink the water.
corticalchaos
not rated yet Mar 22, 2010
I'd like to know who would have control over the moon's terrain? will we fight a war over it? i can't wait :3
DGBEACH
1 / 5 (1) Mar 22, 2010
I'd like to know who would have control over the moon's terrain? will we fight a war over it? i can't wait :3

Well, if we were to go by who was first to visit the moon then Russia would win the prize wouldn't they...hands down.
Sanescience
not rated yet Mar 23, 2010
When you say "visit", it sounds like your talking about actual people going to the Moon, which of course only the USA has done. The Soviet Union, was first to the Moon with a probe if you count something that just smashed into the surface.

Any "war" *on* the Moon will probably be fought with robots and "avatar" units, and will be directed from Earth.
dutchman
not rated yet Mar 24, 2010
To answer the question, why did the astronauts not find any water:

I understand (and this article did not mention that) all the water is found on the dark side of the moon where solar radiation does not reach and therefore, cannot evaporate it.

Landing sites for these missions are predetirmined well before the rocket launch by NASA. A lot of considerations go into this decision. The most important one being survivability.
moonwater2010
Mar 26, 2010
This comment has been removed by a moderator.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.