Understanding human threats to the Earth's largest habitat -- the deep sea

Jan 26, 2010
Deep pelagic animals such as this fangtooth have body shapes and lifestyles that are uniquely adapted to life in the deep sea. Image: © 2008 MBARI

(PhysOrg.com) -- When most people think about the deep sea, they picture broad expanses of muddy seafloor. However, the majority of deep-sea animals, and perhaps the majority of all animals on Earth, live in the "deep pelagic zone"--the dark waters between the ocean surface and the seafloor. An important research paper by MBARI marine biologist Bruce Robison points out that this seemingly remote habitat is increasingly being affected by human activities. Robison's paper highlights the urgent need to understand and protect the diversity of animals in this unique and vital habitat.

The "deep pelagic zone" extends from about one hundred meters (330 feet) below the to just above the deep seafloor. Because it is four to ten kilometers (2.5 to 6 miles) deep and covers perhaps two thirds of the Earth's surface, this zone forms the largest single habitat for life on Earth. Robison suggests that the immense volume of this three-dimensional habitat contains more different species and more individual organisms than any other environment on the planet.

After decades of studying deep-sea animals, Robison says, "For most people these animals are out of sight and out of mind. They are also out of reach to all but a few scientists equipped with the latest technology. As a consequence, we know far too little about them. Because these animals are adapted to life in deep water, many are strange looking, even bizarre, but they are also wonderful examples of natural diversity. The bottom line is that the inhabitants of this environment constitute both the largest and least known animal communities on Earth."

Vampyroteuthis is a deep-sea relative of octopus and squids that lives at depths where there is very little oxygen. Image: © 2005 MBARI

Robison continues, "A million or more undescribed species, with biological adaptations and ecological mechanisms not yet imagined, may live within the vast volume of the deep-sea water column... The animals in this huge habitat make up essential links in the oceanic . They also provide food for important commercial species like tuna and salmon, as well as for whales, turtles, and giant squid."

Because deep-sea animals are seldom seen, it's easy to think of them as being relatively immune to effects of human activities. However, Robison argues that ongoing processes such as overfishing, ocean acidification, and expanding low-oxygen zones in the ocean could eventually wipe out key organisms and cause irreversible changes in deep-sea food webs. Such shifts in deep-sea animal communities might be invisible at the surface, but could directly impact marine mammals, human fisheries, or even the Earth's climate. Robison says, "Given the changes occurring in the upper layers of the ocean, there can be little doubt that substantive changes must be taking place in deeper waters as well."

According to Robison's paper, "The principal concern here should be the prospect of undetected mass extinctions, which threaten losses in ecosystem function, economic opportunity, and vital ecosystem services." Less dramatically, some deep-water species may flourish, while others become less common. For example, Robison suggests that animals that reproduce quickly, such as jellies and squids, may end up replacing animals such as deep-sea fish, which mature late and bear fewer young.

However, in order to figure out if deep-sea species are changing, researchers must have some idea of what's already down there. This is why Robison stresses the need to document the existing biodiversity in deep-sea communities.

As Robison put it, "These animals probably outnumber all others on Earth, but they are so little known that their biodiversity has yet to be even estimated." Thus, changes in the numbers of and diversity of deep sea animals may already be occurring without our knowledge. Robison adds, "We can't be good stewards to these communities if we don't know who the animals are. The main problem is that we don't have baseline data. Without baseline information on the animals that currently make up these communities, we can't measure natural changes or those caused by human activity."

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

From a scientific perspective, a diverse ecosystem is usually a healthy ecosystem. As Robison writes in his paper, "Biological diversity promotes ecological stability. Protecting the stability of the ecosystem that provides a major portion of the world's food supply is obviously in our best interest."

Robison goes on to say, "Although the deep sea has begun to receive the attention of conservationists, their efforts to date have focused chiefly on the deep seafloor." He emphasizes that one of the main barriers to conservation of deep pelagic is lack of knowledge. "Despite the global significance of the deep pelagic fauna and the obvious benefits of protecting its biodiversity, the basic information necessary to do so is still lacking."

Robison argues that humans have no time to waste in collecting baseline information about deep-sea biodiversity. He also recommends setting aside protected areas in the deep sea even though our information about deep-sea biodiversity remains incomplete. "We should begin including the deep pelagic communities when we establish protected areas at the sea surface or on the ... Common sense tells us that the oceans should be protected and that protection should include the conservation of deep pelagic biodiversity."

Explore further: Grouse moor burning causes widespread environmental changes

More information: B. H. Robison. www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/122323401/HTMLSTART . Conservation of deep pelagic diversity. Conservation Biology. 2009. Vol 23, Issue 4. August, 2009

Related Stories

Study reveals secret sex life of fish

Feb 22, 2006

Scientists have long thought of deep-sea pelagic fish as nomadic wanderers, but now they suspect the fish may be meeting at ridges or seamounts to spawn.

New research reveals deep-sea fish population boom

Apr 11, 2006

A new study exploring the vast, dark plains at the bottom of the ocean has produced a rare insight into the animal populations in the deep sea. A team of researchers in the US, led by University of Aberdeen ...

Researchers trace octopuses' family tree

Nov 12, 2008

Many of the world's deep-sea octopuses evolved from species that lived in the Southern Ocean, according to new molecular evidence reported by researchers at Queen's University Belfast.

Wanderlust -- deep-sea fauna under Antarctic ice shelf

Jan 24, 2007

Under the former Larsen ice shelf east of the Antarctic Peninsula, deep-sea sea cucumbers and stalked feather stars were ubiquitously found in shallow waters. These animals usually inhabit far greater water ...

Recommended for you

Can fair trade plastic save people and the planet?

1 hour ago

(Phys.org) —It's old news that open-source 3D printing is cheaper than conventional manufacturing, not to mention greener and incredibly useful for making everything from lab equipment to chess pieces. ...

User comments : 6

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

jonnyboy
1 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2010
I see very little substantive research and an incredible amount of maybe's, possibly's, could be's and obviously's. Perhaps physorg could provide a little more insight into their vetting process for articles.
scidog
5 / 5 (1) Jan 26, 2010
boy--physorg is a gloss,a wrap up,a whats new for the general reading of people with an interest in science.if you take the time to look at the bottom of the post you will see something called "more information".if you look for more information you will find it there,and i'll bet links to peer reviewed papers on the subjects..nice fish photo,golly i wonder why they did not include the full scientific name for it..fanggydeepechompys..
Adriab
not rated yet Jan 27, 2010
physorg also contains a good amount of conjecture or opinion pieces. Not necessarily a bad thing, but it can be kind of disappointing when you see a cool head-line only to find a lacking article.
boldone894
not rated yet Jan 27, 2010
I do tend to agree that many conclusions, posted here on physorg, seem to be a bit thin in the science and seem to be little more than conjectures. I really enjoy physorg and I look forward to the updates, but both my wife and I would like to see the articles be a little tighter in the science and a bit less hype in the headlines (unless the solid bits are there to support the statement).
Many of the articles seem to present associative evidence rather than direct evidence. As an example, I bring up the associative rice--> "alcohol flush" article in regards to Asian flush while drinking.
I get the journalist idea of getting us to read the thing, but there have been a few let-downs.
For the most part though, I must say, keep up the good work!
workinsync
not rated yet Jan 27, 2010
For more video of some cool deep sea fishes (including a live Anglerfish), check out the following two videos from a recent expedition:

http://www.youtub...5D2rF1SA

http://www.youtub...EAFOy9V4

workinsync
not rated yet Jan 27, 2010